dokoslangasek, infinity: uhd is entangled as well. now uploaded no-change rebuilds00:24
dokoand oce ...00:46
dokoopenimageio too00:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]01:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fscrypt [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fscrypt [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fscrypt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]01:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]01:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]01:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2]01:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fscrypt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)01:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fscrypt [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)01:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fscrypt [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)01:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2]01:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2]01:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fscrypt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2]01:28
infinityxnox: Did you seriously entangle a mir transition with the rest of this mess? :(02:12
infinityxnox: Oh, mirclient didn't bump ABI.  Maybe I won't hunt you down.02:13
tsimonq2(mir has enough rdeps to manage a transition? *runs*)02:14
infinitytsimonq2: Still a few, and they're the sorts of things that trigger 3 days of tests.02:15
infinity(gtk, xorg, mesa...)02:15
tsimonq2infinity: Ah gotcha02:16
slangasekinfinity: did step 44 from the checklist get done? (Open an RT to ask IS to create chroots on the porter boxes.)02:24
infinityslangasek: Nein.  Finishing the checklist was on my checklist after this (&!^%^ transition.02:25
slangasekinfinity: (which might be relevant to trying to fix mrpt on armhf)02:25
infinityslangasek: But if someone (you?) was feeling the urge to investigate the SIGBUS in blender, I see how that would be a chicken and egg.02:26
infinityslangasek: Or mrpt.02:26
infinityI'm hoping they're the same root cause.   Bug life's never that simple.02:26
slangasekif I manage to get a reproducer environment, I might be able to tell you02:26
dokolooks like somebody shoved in all his merges for bionic ... ;p regardless of transitions04:31
infinitydoko: I'm testing a fix for deal.ii right now.04:32
dokoinfinity: it's uploaded04:40
infinitydoko: Oh, I was testing the upstream fix. :P04:42
infinityIf it's good, I think I'll swap fixes with yours.04:42
infinitydoko: Ooo, I think I have an openimageio/blender fix.  Just need a test build iteration of both to confirm.07:24
dokoinfinity: and that will be enough? it looks like some gnome stuff wants to transition as well ...07:27
dokojbicha: any gnome related soname bumps in -proposed?07:28
infinitydoko: I dunno.  I've been staring at this for the last couple of hours, not britney.07:28
infinitydoko: But once this is fixed, I'll go back to britney and see if we're done.07:28
infinitydoko: vorlon fixed mrpt, I believe.07:28
dokoosgearth autopkg test regression on armhf07:29
dokono, britney doesn't look good07:30
dokobut update-output-helper doesn't work for me, and Laney isn't here07:30
infinityoutput will be a mess because boost went back to not being a valid candidate, pending ceph tests.07:32
dokopromoted some boost binaries again07:34
infinityAhh, for ceph and rados.07:35
infinityHow fun.07:35
infinityWell, this is a fine time for autopkgtest.ubuntu.com to go away.07:41
* LocutusOfBorg is not feeling alone anymore with the F5 key on that page07:49
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Hammering the F5 key wasn't helping.  At all.08:06
infinityLocutusOfBorg: It had a load in the hundreds.08:06
* infinity murdered half of its processes, and now it seems happy.08:06
apwthose rebuild on demand pages ...08:12
infinityapw: Yeah, that's not what was killing it.08:16
infinityapw: There was some cron-like job that appears to desperately want locking and had a few dozen running.  And that was eating the CPU hard enough that apache's request.cgi and browse.cgi were backed up to last week, and the whole thing just gave up and stopped talking to people.08:18
apwhmmm, i wonder if that is the one dropping the running summary (which is periodically generated)08:18
infinityNot if the name is accurate.08:19
infinityupdate-github-jobs is the thing that's chasing its own tail.08:19
apwoh, nasty, that thing should die in a pit of boiling oil08:20
infinityNot inclines to disagree.08:20
infinityNor inclined.08:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (artful-proposed/main) [1:5.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.4.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)08:54
=== Guest19654 is now known as Laney
Laneydoko: what you want brother09:09
LocutusOfBorgLaney, I guess armhf failing with ENOSPACE on autopkgtests09:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (artful-proposed/main) [1:5.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.4.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)09:14
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: "update-output-helper doesn't work for me" would be a very weird way of expressing that question09:15
infinityLocutusOfBorg: That's been going on for a while now.  Retrying when they're less loaded works.09:21
infinityJust a PITA.09:21
Laneywhere is it visible right now?09:23
infinityLaney: A bunch of k* stuff failed on armhf with ENOSPCish issues just recently.09:24
infinityWhere "recently" is in the last few hours.09:24
infinityIt may be cleared up by now.09:25
Laneygosh darn it09:25
Laneyok, when you catch it in the act (since I never have), can you get onto the machine that's running it and see what else is going on?09:26
infinityLaney: I mean, I never really catch it "in the act", cause I tend to notice once the logs have been sucked up and britney's whining.09:26
infinityThat's a pretty hefty delay for realtime debugging.09:26
infinityLaney: Speaking of things misbehaving.  Is that you editing update-github-jobs on juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-2 (wow, what a hostname)?09:28
LaneyGuess we could reduce the parallelism and add some more nodes09:28
LaneyThanks juju09:28
Laneythat's autopkgtest-web/0 to me09:28
infinityLaney: Oh, excellent.  I was about to whine to you about that needing some locking, but because I'm ignorant of how this deploys, wasn't sure I would be able to make an edit that was sicky.09:28
Laneydo the thing in autopkgtest-cloud git and then do the same thing on that machine09:29
infinity(Also, 418 days uptime, while impressive, is also a bit wrong)09:29
Laneyit had a lot of stale files in the PENDING_DIR too09:30
Laneywho even knows how they got there09:30
infinitypitti knows.09:30
Laneywell, I know how they *got* there09:30
infinityAnd he's not talking.09:30
Laneybut I don't know why they stayed there09:30
* infinity sends the blender/armhf build on its merry way and does a happy dance.09:30
Laneyubuntu@juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-2:/tmp/autopkgtest_webcontrol/github-pending$ time sudo flock -w 60 /run/lock/update-github-jobs.lock ~ubuntu/autopkgtest-cloud/webcontrol/update-github-jobs09:32
Laneyseems a bit happier09:32
infinitydoko: britney seems to be telling me that once it's happy with mrpt, blender, and deal.ii, it'll all migrate.  And all of those are buildable/building/publishing.  So, we're close.09:32
infinityLaney: Excellent.  We'd had one running since May, so the job itself is clearly not super bright.09:33
LaneyWell, the -w 60 should cause email if it fails now09:34
LaneyI bet it's some case like the PR being deleted while the tests are running09:34
LaneyI'll look when it happens next09:35
Laneywowzers, half of haskell got removed from testing09:35
infinityI'd be okay with all of haskell being removed entirely from the archive.09:36
infinityBut, to be fair to the flavour-of-the-month gladiators, we'd also have to remove golang.09:36
infinity(aw, darn)09:36
* infinity is going to prove how much he hates himself with a trip to McDonald's at 3:38am.09:38
apwinfinity, can i suggest you turn the unapproved queue until you get this heap to migrate09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-1ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)09:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 (zesty-proposed/universe) [384.90-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 384.90-0ubuntu0.17.04.2] (no packageset)09:57
infinityapw: Oh ye of little faith.10:01
apwheh, well it happened to you twice alresdy :)10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysdig [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.8.0-1ubuntu3]10:29
LocutusOfBorgsorry Laney for forwarding the wrong question then :)10:34
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: np :P10:37
* LocutusOfBorg keeps fingers crossed10:39
* LocutusOfBorg looks scary at britney output and see morse-simulator10:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: node-gulp-newer (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-1]10:44
LocutusOfBorg^^ this should finally unblock that node-foo10:46
LocutusOfBorgso, britney, migration, autosync open?10:47
LocutusOfBorgor a little perl upload before the autosync?10:47
dokodans le lac, dans le lac, avec une pierre sur les pieds!10:48
infinityLocutusOfBorg: morse-simulator is only there because of blender.10:53
infinityWhich is publishing in this cycle.10:53
* infinity puts the publisher on manual to get the britney run in a single "transaction".10:54
* LocutusOfBorg is unsure uploading ceph was a good idea11:24
infinityI won't hurt anything.11:25
infinityCause I'm not letting anything publish until icu migrates.11:25
LocutusOfBorgso, migration in this run? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/bionic/2017-10-31/11:25:01.log11:26
LocutusOfBorgooh thanks infinity this is awesome :)11:26
infinityObviously not the run you linked.11:26
infinityBut the next one after this current publisher run settles.11:26
LocutusOfBorgoh ok, so half an hour11:26
infinityOr more.11:26
LocutusOfBorgyep, probably11:27
apwi doubt it will be that quick with 6 transitions in it11:27
infinitybritney takes a while to think that hard.11:27
infinityShame the ocaml transition won't make it, but oh well.11:27
infinityIf someone wants to fix the plpot/ppc64el segv, that'd be lovely.11:27
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I'm stopped by that ppx, putting in -proposed 3 packages should be mostly ok11:27
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I tried on debian porterbox, and no segv, so I can't debug it further11:28
LocutusOfBorgppx-core failure is obscure to me <-- xnox any idea?11:28
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, last time it was hard too =/11:30
LocutusOfBorgbut that error seems a failure related to ocaml missing files11:30
xnoxinfinity, why do we keep "maintaining" packages in ubuntu that have been RoQA in Debian?11:30
infinityxnox: Which package?11:31
xnoxinfinity, for example diet11:31
infinityxnox: Because no one noticed it was removed, I suppose.11:31
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1728466 in diet (Ubuntu) "Please remove diet (removed from Debian)" [Undecided,New]11:32
xnoxinfinity, it seems like our removals take too long / are low priority / high overhead?11:32
infinityxnox: Or someone did notice indeed. :)11:32
xnoxas in it is quicker for me to fix it, then to remove it, but i've been fixing same packages over and over and over again just to get boost moving11:32
jbichahttps://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ < have fun11:32
xnoxbut in total, removing it years ago, would save my time over these past years.11:33
infinityxnox: To be fair, jbicha filed that bug all of two days ago.11:33
xnoxinfinity, sure, but it was removed from debian a while ago, no?11:33
xnoxactually no11:33
xnoxjust in september11:33
xnoxah, removed from testing in 201411:34
infinityYes.  And I imagine we've been crap about manually checking those things.11:34
jbichauntil a day or two ago, it had a reverse-recommends in Ubuntu from a debian-science metapackage too11:34
xnoxbut we have stopped following removals from testing / never done that11:34
infinityWe've never followed testing removals.11:34
xnoxhence me recalling diet for years.11:34
infinityAnd very much can't with auto-removals.11:34
infinityBecause auto-removals punt things temporarily all the time.11:34
xnoxand then i go and rant that debian doesn't remove crap from unstable either.11:34
dokotyhicks: fscrypt ftbfs on some archs, just in case you don't expect that ;p11:34
xnoxbecause auto-removal from testing is good enough.11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-gulp-newer [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-1]11:35
xnoxinfinity, i wish these would be processed.... t that debian doesn't remove crap from unstable either.11:35
xnox<doko> tyhicks: fscrypt ftbfs on some archs, just in case you don't expect that ;p11:35
xnoxinfinity, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=u8rm11:35
xnoxdoko, miss-paste11:35
dokoand I thought you turned on echo mode for my comments ;)11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-gulp-newer [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)11:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-gulp-newer [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-1]11:38
LocutusOfBorgnew run started11:42
infinityWon't be this one, I don't think.11:43
infinitySeems to have started 2 minutes before the archive was published. :P11:44
dokocan that be better triggered?11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: diet [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7] (no packageset)11:45
infinityIt's not so much a triggering issue as it is that long runs delay the next.11:46
infinity(Yes, there's a TODO to also get faster triggering, but when britney is taking 14 minutes, as well as other archive reports adding to that, we get what we get)11:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: diet [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7] (no packageset)11:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: diet [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7] (no packageset)11:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: diet [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7] (no packageset)11:48
infinityxnox: So, you complained about it and then fixed it?11:48
xnoxinfinity, yes because previously i've been told to fix things than demand their removal.11:49
ginggsinfinity: slow removals are slow... if only there were people volunteering to join ubuntu-archive ;)11:50
xnoxinfinity, colin.... steve...11:50
infinityxnox: "Removed from Debian and no rdeps" has always been a valid reason to ask for removal.11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected diet [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7]11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected diet [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7]11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected diet [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7]11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected diet [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu7]11:50
infinityxnox: When those conditions aren't met is when we tell you to stop saying "let's just remove it".11:50
cjwatsonYeah, I never told you to not remove things when they'd been removed from Debian and had no rdeps.11:50
infinityAnd I guarantee Steve didn't, cause he's more removal-happy than I like.11:51
xnoxso how about these things then? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=u8rm11:51
jbichadoes removed from Debian sometimes mean "removed from Debian Testing" here?11:51
infinityI saw the paste the first time.11:51
infinityjbicha: No.11:51
xnoxsecurity team is begging to remove click =/11:51
infinityjbicha: Removed from testing is completely meaningless these days.11:52
xnoxsometimes its real, but often it is not.11:52
xnoxand will come back in a month or two.11:52
infinityxnox: I thought something was blocking click removal the last time we looked at this stack.11:52
infinityxnox: If that's no longer true, I'm happy to revisit.11:53
infinityxnox: Also, do you have some sort of sign-off from responsible parties for each of these?  I've been told a few times that we don't just get to decide "that was a phone tihng, no one cares anymore" all by ourselves.11:54
infinity(if we did, we'd remove mir too, for instance)11:54
xnoxinfinity, we will not remove mir, mir is stills upported.11:54
xnoxi don't see how mir is entagled yet, one sec.11:54
infinityxnox: Yes.  I know.  But you see my point.11:54
xnoxinfinity, all the python3-click stuff is the real python-click, not our click packages.11:55
jbichainfinity: can we remove and see if anyone complains?11:55
infinityxnox: Where's your evidence, other than "xnox, who never worked on this stack, said so" that all of these packages are fair game?11:55
xnoxinfinity, and click-apparmor/click-systemd/click-bin-path are leaf things.11:55
xnoxinfinity, the bit of merge proposal signed off by wili cooke, laney, security team?11:55
* xnox is not sure i spelled wil right11:56
xnoxinfinity, listing all the removals...?11:56
infinityxnox: Which isn't linked on the bugs, and you haven't FedExed me a hard copy.11:56
infinityxnox: I'm not big on doing things based on faith.11:56
infinityMaybe I missed some smoke signals?11:57
xnoxinfinity, but e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click-apparmor/+bug/1713710 you do see jdstrand saying please nuke this, right?12:01
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1713710 in click-apparmor (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [High,Triaged]12:01
xnoxinfinity, asked for will cooke to comment again on all of these bugs, in plain sight....12:01
infinityxnox: Yeah, I'm not questioning click, but your bug search is a lot more than click.12:01
infinityxnox: For instance, while I would *love* to remove oxide-qt (and find a time machine, and remove it three years ago), people spent a lot of time telling me it was important, even post-post-phone.12:02
infinityxnox: So, I need people who aren't you to tell me it's not anymore.12:02
jbichahow recently was that, for oxide-qt?12:02
infinityjbicha: Like I said, post-post-phone, so in the last 6mo.12:02
xnoxinfinity, it's the stuff from https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-seeds/unity8-removals/+merge/32361512:04
xnoxinfinity, there are conflicting singnals from conflicting groups.12:04
xnoxinfinity, hence e.g. i did add a kiosk seed to keep track of things we are committing to keep. like mir and miral stuff.12:04
xnoxinfinity, plus some people did not realise that removal from $dev doesn't remove things from xenial, or the snap store =/12:06
infinityxnox: So, for instance, the inline comments there state they want to keep content-hub, but you filed for removal.12:06
xnoxinfinity, correct, because that has changed later =/12:06
xnoxinfinity, they claimed they wanted it into the kiosk, seed, but then backed down from it.12:07
xnoxinfinity, they did land the massive merge that dropped content hub deps from qtubuntu / qtmir last cycle, no?12:07
xnox(they needed content hub, until that merge landed)12:07
xnoxinfinity, and content-hub is gone now, and nobody is screaming.12:08
infinityErr, yeah, I mixed up content-hub and media-hub there.12:08
LaneyI asked for that merge proposal to be updated12:08
xnoxinfinity, there are no comments about media-hub it seems.12:08
xnoxLaney, true.12:08
infinityAnyhow, this is helpful, but it also seems very lacking in some sort of final consensus.12:09
xnoxLaney, is the format it was in previously good enough? just drop the lines that have been processed, and list only the things that are still to be removed?12:09
infinityHappy to whack click* though.12:09
LaneyIt was reasonably useful as a way to comment on individual items12:09
xnoxinfinity, well click-*, we still have things build-dep on libclick-dev. But without removing click itself, just yet, due to click-* rdeps12:10
xnoxinfinity, i do not want removals to increase uninstallable counts, because britney.12:10
xnoxinfinity, hence leaf-first removals.12:10
infinity* click-apparmor12:10
infinity* click-bin-path12:10
infinity* click-systemd12:10
infinity* unity-scopes-api12:10
infinityAnd unity-scopes-api is still elsewhere entangled, if I recall.12:11
infinityWhich is where we were at last time we talked about this.12:11
xnoxinfinity, last one is a funny one....12:11
infinityRight, url-dispatcher hell.12:11
infinityxnox: So, no, I can't action this.  HTH, HAND.12:11
xnoxLaney, is unity-scopes-api u8 or u7 thing? and will clicks be supported going forward?12:11
xnoxinfinity, HTH?12:12
infinityHope That Helps.12:12
LaneyDunno, sorry, I'm a bit busy right now12:12
xnoxinfinity, you can remove click-apparmor12:12
infinityNo point until it's all on the chopping block.12:12
infinitySort out the url-dispatcher mess.12:12
infinityThen come back.12:12
xnoxinfinity, my uploads removing url-dispatcher got reverted by seb12812:12
xnoxinfinity, so i need to what, raise it to the TC?12:13
jbichaxnox: was that intentional or was that just because you refuse to use the Vcs like we ask?12:13
xnoxinfinity, seb128 does not have time himself to remove url-dispatcher dependencies12:13
infinityWell, url-dispatcher itself may be good and wonderful, it's url-dispatcher linking libunity-scopes1.0 that's likely where the break needs to happen.12:13
infinityBut maybe both need to go, I dunno.  Not my call.12:14
xnoxjbicha, if that team doesn't like the work offered, that team can do the work themselves.12:14
infinityjbicha: "Didn't use the VCS" should never be an excuse for accidental reverts.  We don't build from the VCS, it's not authoritative.12:15
infinityEven bileto got this right. :P12:15
xnoxinfinity, it was not accidental. it was intentional. "revert xnox upload for not using vcs" that revert upload was also done not using vcs.12:15
infinityOne of the few things it did right.12:15
jbichaoh come on, xnox blatanly refuses to use the bzr branch despite being asked politely many times12:15
xnoxinfinity, i like how url-dispatcher has a loop onto itself via unity-scopes-api12:16
infinityjbicha: Well, I can't speak to any ongoing feuds there, but while I don't "blatantly refuse", I often rapid-fire a fix at the archive and don't have time to go checking for and checking out everyone's pet VCS to make sure the changes aren't lost.12:17
infinityBut I also live in some weird era all by myself, I guess, where I debdiff before I upload.12:17
jbichainfinity: we don't have a problem with you, xnox's words and actions went further12:18
jbichaand this is the second time recently that xnox brought this up so I thought I would respond this time12:18
xnoxinfinity, i was told to commit no change rebuilds for boost transitions before =)))))))12:18
infinityMmm, look at all those tasty ACCEPTED mails.12:19
seb128xnox, you have been asked several time nicely to please use the vcs or hand a debdiff to us if you can't be bothered but to not cowboy uploads for that set without review or vcs use, it's not that much to ask is it?12:20
seb128anyway we had that discussion for hours and I doubt it leads to something this time so I'm not going to argue12:20
xnoxseb128, please remove packages from the archive that are no longer maintained.12:20
seb128just re-state that for those who don't have context12:20
xnoxseb128, however you like.12:20
xnoxseb128, e.g. url-dispatcher dependency chains - either with removals, source code changes / conditionalising code, etc. as you wish. it's all yours.12:21
infinityOr unity-scopes-api.12:21
infinityWhich I made even worse this cycle by making it build-dep on g++-6. :P12:22
xnoxseb128, how do i escalate this request, as it has been overdue. It was due to remove u8 deps for artful release.12:22
xnoxuniverse is not a graveyard, things we deprecate we must remove from the archive - for example old toolchains, upstart, etc.12:22
xnoxseb128, infinity - last time i've asked seb128 to handle these removals, the way he wants them to be done, he refused to do so, citing the lack of time.12:23
seb128you can remove a good part of universe by that definition12:23
xnoxseb128, i'm talking about canonical-upstream, never in debian, deprecated project.12:23
seb128xnox, stop being childish12:24
seb128it's not that hard to send us a debdiff or commit to a vcs you have commit access to12:24
seb128all those discussions are orthogonal to the point12:24
seb128you are just making a point of not wanting to respect our workflow for whatever reason12:24
seb128you could have done a commit by 10/10th of the efforts you are putting into arguing there12:25
seb128that said I go back to do work, if you are interested in working with others rather than being confrontational you are still welcome to send us  a patch or to commit to the vcs listed in control and dput12:25
=== wgrant_ is now known as wgrant
infinityRe-enabling the publisher to publish the icu transition to the release pocket.12:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 [source] (xenial-proposed) [384.90-0ubuntu0.16.04.2]12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 [source] (zesty-proposed) [384.90-0ubuntu0.17.04.2]12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 [source] (artful-proposed) [384.90-0ubuntu3.17.10.1]12:46
jhodappxnox, infinity what about media-hub exactly?12:58
xnoxjhodapp, is it a u8 thing and dead; or a useful thing stand alone; is it supported as part of u7 desktop? is it supported as part of gnome desktop? should it be removed? is it used by mir/kiosk?12:59
xnoxgeneral archeology12:59
infinityjhodapp: It's on xnox's "remove from the archive for 18.04" list.  Should it be?13:00
xnoxyeah that ^13:00
jhodappxnox, it can be useful with u7, u8 although I haven't actually seen someone take it up yet13:01
jhodappit's more that it's potentially useful13:01
jbichajoedborg: could you give an answer that looks more like yes or no ? ;)13:06
jbichajhodapp: ^13:06
jhodappjbicha, depends, how much from u8's ecosystem are we keeping around in general?13:07
jbichaunity8 itself was removed from Ubuntu 17.10, what's left are some old dependencies13:09
jhodappjbicha, which ones are you keeping around for example? I can better answer your question then13:10
jbichamir is kept because of Canonical kiosk projects, I'm not aware of much else specifically from Unity8 that we still are explicitly keeping13:11
jbichaif you wanted to run Unity8 on Ubuntu 17.10, you would need dozens of packages that have been removed13:12
jbichaUnity7 is being kept around as long as it works although we did remove Ubuntu Online Accounts which makes Unity not as useful in 17.10 as Unity was in 17.0413:15
jhodappjbicha, ok, so this is removing from the main archive and not universe? Or is this complete removal?13:16
jhodappok, well it's probably worth removing then since you're doing 99% of the others13:46
LocutusOfBorgare britney/publisher running now?14:14
LocutusOfBorginfinity, your fpc fix, I'm going to try a force-sync, because the new upstream release (according to the fact that this was an upstream cherry-pick) should include it14:19
LocutusOfBorgeven if that file is still untouched, I see some case-sensitiveness fixes somewhere around it14:19
infinityLocutusOfBorg: britney will be back on shortly.14:33
infinityLocutusOfBorg: And I don't even recall what fpc fix you're referring to. :)14:33
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I *think* this was some sort of testsuite fix14:33
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fpc/3.0.2+dfsg-5ubuntu1 probably making autopkgtests sad, because the -5 plain upload was building on affected arches14:34
LocutusOfBorghistory seems to agree with me http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/fpc/artful/amd6414:35
LocutusOfBorgconfirmed, lets try to drop and see what happens https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/f/fpc/20170914_190934_5f054@/log.gz14:35
ubot5Debian bug 875838 in fpc "fpc: test/units/sysutils/texpfncase fails on some systems (patch attached)" [Important,Fixed]14:35
LocutusOfBorgthanks for the britney restore14:36
infinityYes, they claim it's fixed.  I didn't check to be sure.14:36
LocutusOfBorgdebdiff looks promising TBH14:36
LocutusOfBorgbtw I would upload perl since queues are empty14:36
LocutusOfBorguploading in 30 minutes14:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (xenial-proposed/multiverse) [ =>] (no packageset)14:41
infinityauto-sync enabled.14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)14:49
acheronukbut with the auto-sync and Qt transition, I may as well take a few days off!14:51
LocutusOfBorguploading perl *now* then14:53
acheronukuh oh14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)14:55
tsimonq2infinity: Qt transition started14:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)14:56
* LocutusOfBorg sits on the river, waiting for the world to explode14:58
* tsimonq2 joins LocutusOfBorg 14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: libayatana-appindicator (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.5.2-1]14:58
* acheronuk finds a nice riverside pub with a beer garden14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)14:59
LocutusOfBorgnode-babel seems to need bootstrapping15:01
LocutusOfBorgso, if anybody has the powers...15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: acpi-call (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2 => 1.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dm-writeboost (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.2.6-1~16.04.1 => 2.2.6-1~16.04.2] (no packageset)15:04
tsimonq2Qt needs some moar poking, things should be syncing then depwait. QtBase is uploaded, and when I get home in ~ 5 hours I'll upload the rest with deltas.15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ndiswrapper (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.60-3~ubuntu16.04.1 => 1.60-3~ubuntu16.04.2] (no packageset)15:05
tsimonq2For now, the queue goes to perl then :P15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dahdi-linux (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:2.10.2~dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1:2.10.2~dfsg-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-1]15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-1]15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-monasca-statsd (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1]15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-1]15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-1]15:07
jbichaflexiondotorg: do you know if those ayatana-indicator packages will cause any problems being synced to Ubuntu?15:08
flexiondotorgjbicha: I spoke to sunweaver about this last week.15:09
flexiondotorgMy understanding is all the libraries have different namespaces.15:09
flexiondotorgSo no collisions.15:09
jbichaok, sounds fun 🤠15:10
LocutusOfBorgand remmina supports them both15:11
LocutusOfBorgwhich one to choose? right now it picked up the alternate dependency, just because ayatana is not available.15:11
LocutusOfBorgA no-change rebuild will make it pick the new one, should we MIR it? my goal is to include all the changes in Debian, the delta is near zero now15:12
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: Debian just switched the order, but I believe we'll need to revert that for Ubuntu for now15:12
jbichaI don't think any Ubuntu desktop supports the new ayatana-appindicator but several support the old one so we shouldn't change yet15:13
sil2100infinity, apw: I was fixing biometryd that's FTBFS with the new boost, had it fixed besides a qml unittest that just keeps failing - and now after a quick chat with kenvandine we noticed that it's just a leaf package that's not used anywhere, so...15:13
LocutusOfBorgok so from the next merge I'll swap them15:13
sil2100infinity, apw: can we just remove it?15:14
sil2100Pretty please?15:14
sil2100No rdeps, not seeded anywhere, not caring (was for the turbo device for touch)15:14
jbichabiometryd is listed on LP: #171307615:15
ubot5Launchpad bug 1713076 in thumbnailer (Ubuntu) "Please remove more orphaned unity8 packages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/171307615:15
sil2100jbicha: thanks15:16
sil2100Let me comment there15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)15:18
apwsounds reasonable to me15:19
xnoxinfinity, well done you =) the drop on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/history.html looks really nice =)15:23
sil2100Well job, good done15:26
bdmurraysil2100: Could you release some SRUs I've done?15:27
bdmurraysil2100: update-manager, ubuntu-release-upgrader and cracklib215:28
sil2100bdmurray: sure, you mean from -proposed to -updates?15:28
bdmurraysil2100: indeed15:28
LocutusOfBorgmapreri, sync opencv from experimental? (this is a joke)15:30
LocutusOfBorgbut 3.3.1 in experimental is a sensible thing15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-control-center (xenial-proposed/main) [15.04.0+16.04.20170214-0ubuntu1 => 15.04.0+16.04.20170214-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)15:51
=== dax is now known as studentloans
xnoxinfinity, i have dd'ed artful desktop iso onto a usb stick; booting it on lenovo idepad it offers me two options "uefi usb boot" and "usb hdd boot".15:55
xnoxuefi works15:55
xnoxusb hdd ends up with isolinux prompt no config found15:56
xnoxis it normal, or do we expect isolinux / legacy boot of usb work? as far as i can tell, it works with xenial.iso15:56
naccslangasek: sorry to bug you again, upstream php did another microrelease while my SRUs are in the unapproved queues. I think it makes sense to just update to those, can you reject src:php7.0 from xenial src:php7.1 from artful? I'll reupload both today after updating php7.1 in bionic.16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected php7.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [7.0.24-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected php7.1 [source] (artful-proposed) [7.1.10-0ubuntu0.17.10.1]16:07
rbasaknacc, slangasek: ^ done16:07
naccrbasak: thanks!16:07
Laneyxnox: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-xenial/xenial/s390x/c/clblas/20171031_154729_bfa18@/log.gz16:12
Laneythat is the one16:12
xnoxLaney, wow ^_^16:13
xnoxi have seen a miracle now16:13
Laneya halloween present for you16:20
tsimonq2Laney: On a scale from no-change rebuild to merging debian-installer from Debian and losing all your work 10 times in a row, how much sp00k? :P16:35
Laneytsimonq2: New GHC upload when you've reached level 15 of a Haskell transition16:37
Laney<insert horror movie scream>16:37
tsimonq2Laney: damn that's spooky :P16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)16:42
LocutusOfBorghey please don't make haskell jokes! they are too scary to me16:43
tsimonq2Can someone pretty please review qtbase in NEW so we can have a quick and easy Qt transition? <316:44
LocutusOfBorgbtw a good joke: perl takes longer on amd64 than armhf and arm64 lol16:44
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: loll16:44
LocutusOfBorg"quick and easy QT transition" <-- its a trap!16:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)16:45
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, unfortunately that slow amd64 makes the publisher sad because the arch:all aren't available16:45
LocutusOfBorgI remember britney showing sadness for this16:45
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: lol Qt 5.9.2 transition should be quick and painless now that I'm a MOTU16:47
tsimonq2And yeah, arch:all :/16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.22]17:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)17:07
slangasek sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy : Depends: build-essential but it is not going to be installed17:07
slangasekthat's not good17:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.21 => 2.408.22] (desktop-core)17:07
sil2100bdmurray: as for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1725605, I see someone mentioned the fix 'didn't work' and I saw it being switched to verification-failed17:11
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1725605 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Artful) "upgrade to 17.10 uncalculable without universe" [Medium,Fix committed]17:11
sil2100bdmurray: is this still good to go?17:11
bdmurraysil2100: the didn't work guy did have universe enabled17:26
bdmurraysil2100: and the v-failed autotagging was unrelated17:26
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, hey, do you think we can build perl uploads via a bileto ppa? create a new ppa on bileto.ubuntu.com; then copy package from debian there; wait for it to build on all architectures; click finalise to land into bionic-proposed?17:28
bdmurraysil2100: There's been a bad bug triager of u-r-u bugs too17:28
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, this way all architectures will see the new modules arch:all build at the same time as the binary builds.17:28
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, our amd64 is one of the slower arches, and we have build-essentials uninstallable on ppc64le/s390x for a long time, until amd64 catches up =( and things are not nice.17:28
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, what do you think about that?17:28
slangasekRAOF: hi, could I ask you to have a look today at the livecd-rootfs in xenial-proposed queue?  it fixes a remaining regression that was introduced when launchpad switched to containers for livefs builds17:30
slangasekRAOF: it also includes an unrelated but small change that I haven't bothered filing SRU paperwork for because livecd-rootfs17:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (xenial-proposed/main) [ =>] (core)17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-applet (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.3 => 1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.4] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)17:51
LocutusOfBorgcan you please hold on autosync? perl is probably making something look bad on dpkg side18:18
LocutusOfBorgI need to figure  it out18:18
LocutusOfBorgxnox, last time I tried, I failed in creating a bileto ppa :/18:18
LocutusOfBorgI created a ticket, I didn't find the way to create a ppa, and I closed it after some minutes of digging18:18
LocutusOfBorgor maybe the issue your are talking about is the lazarus one...18:19
LocutusOfBorgmehh, it is building now18:25
LocutusOfBorgso nevermind18:26
LocutusOfBorgI'll retry whatever failed after perl upload18:26
sil2100xnox: I'm looking at your xenial ubiquity upload, was wondering why did you remove the test_secure_ap_can_enter_password test? Is it no longer a valid test with the enterprise changes?18:43
sil2100xnox: ok, I see it's what happened to bionic/artful, so yeah, let me just agree that it's how it should be18:56
LocutusOfBorgperl, sweet per18:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (xenial-proposed) []18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-applet [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.4]19:05
sil2100xnox, doko: btw. I am building dbus-cpp for the boost transition in https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/301919:11
sil2100Might jam some additional touch-related packages there19:11
sil2100xnox, doko: I'll be ignoring those that we might potentially remove, as it's a waste of time then19:11
jbichathe logs look to me like the autosync is crashing? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/2017-10-31/19:53
* jbicha bisects to figure out when it started19:56
jbichahttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/2017-10-03/ before the 23:00 log19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-dashboard (artful-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-dashboard (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:3.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 17.1-27-geb292c18-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-control-center [source] (xenial-proposed) [15.04.0+16.04.20170214-0ubuntu2]20:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 17.1-27-geb292c18-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)20:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (artful-proposed/main) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.10.1 => 17.1-27-geb292c18-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)20:39
smoserhey. those are blackboxsw and i uploads for cloud-inti fix that is in -proposed. small change to what is there... woudl apprediate someone looking20:47
tsimonq2The Qt 5.9.2 transition is currently blocked on qtbase being in NEW.20:54
tsimonq2I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look.20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (artful-proposed) [3:12.0.0-0ubuntu2.2]21:10
=== smoser is now known as ScarySmoser
=== ScarySmoser is now known as smoser
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (zesty-proposed) [3:11.0.3-0ubuntu3.1]21:15
slangasektsimonq2: how painful will that transition be once it does clear new?21:33
tsimonq2slangasek: Minimal, it's a bugfix Qt release and I now have upload access to 75% of what I need to21:59
tsimonq2slangasek: In fact, I'll be surprised if it lasts until the weekend...22:01
slangasektsimonq2: having access to upload is different than the packages building reliably.  how many packages have to be rebuilt, how many of those currently fail to build, etc?22:02
tsimonq2slangasek: (most if not all blockers were dealt with during the last transition)22:02
tsimonq2slangasek: Well at minimum I think there's ABI changes for qtbase and qtdeclarative. From the test rebuilds I've done with sbuild, every build that passed last transition passes this time as well.22:03
tsimonq2(when I say "I think" I'm saying that those are the packages I *know* have ABI changes, others *might* but I'm not entirely sure)22:04
slangasektsimonq2: ok cool22:05
slangasekjbicha: has auto-sync really been failing consistently since the 3rd?  the few logs I've looked at all seem to have different errors22:06
xnoxit will clog the autopkgtest infra which is running at reduced capacity due to lcy redeploy, no?22:16
slangasekxnox: is lcy not already back up?22:18
slangasekit looks up to me22:18
xnoxi see red at https://launchpad.net/builders and not as many builders as usually, but i might be wrong22:19
xnoxand many builders in "cleaning" state is not nice either22:19
slangasekxnox: otoh there are builds started within the past hour; and I see running autopkgtest VMs in lcy01.  I think we're just working through the backlog now22:21
tsimonq2slangasek: New qtbase upload incoming, accidentally forgot something.22:25
tsimonq2(well, as soon as my sponsor uploads it ;) )22:27
jbichaslangasek: I mean I didn't read all the logs but there are lots of failures since then22:31
cjwatsonxnox: not especially bad, but I'm doing an autostab anyway22:35
cjwatsonxnox: fewer builders is because there's an lcy01 redeployment in progress, so lcy01 has three fewer compute nodes than usual because they're part of the redeploy22:35
cjwatsonxnox: hence 1/3 fewer vbuilders in lcy01 because otherwise they wouldn't fit22:36
cjwatsonslangasek: ^-22:36
slangasekok, so the redeploy is still in process22:36
cjwatsonright, it just hasn't yet involved taking down all of lcy0122:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxcfs [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1]22:37
slangasektsimonq2: is this accidentally forgotten thing in any way related to the circular build-dependency between qttools-opensource-src and qtbase-opensource-src/amd64?22:38
slangasektsimonq2: it would probably be a bad idea to accept the binaries on !amd64 archs22:39
tsimonq2slangasek: Yeah22:39
tsimonq2slangasek: Hm, it's late on the side of $sponsor, could you please upload this? http://paste.ubuntu.com/25861608/22:40
tsimonq2y = . or y = why ?22:42
slangaseky = gah22:43
slangasekI mean yes22:43
tsimonq2Ok, thanks22:44
nacclol, I'm going to use that "y = gah"22:44
slangaseknacc: xnox-approved22:44
naccslangasek: :)22:44
tsimonq2slangasek: My plan is to apply for PPU after this transition so there shall be no more "y"s :P22:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu5 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)22:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)22:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)22:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rsplib (bionic-proposed/primary) [3.0.1-1ubuntu5]23:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rsplib [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1ubuntu5]23:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.2+dfsg-4ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.22]23:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu0.16.04.2]23:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu1.1]23:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!