[00:57] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_messagelib build #8: STILL FAILING in 4 hr 0 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_messagelib/8/
[05:02] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_messagelib build #9: STILL FAILING in 4 hr 0 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_messagelib/9/
[09:45] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » linode-01 build #1881: SUCCESS in 55 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=linode-01/1881/
[09:46] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » master build #1881: SUCCESS in 1 min 1 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=master/1881/
[09:47] <acheronuk> Riddell: why is this on KDE git? https://cgit.kde.org/kubuntu-notification-helper.git/
[09:48] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » swy-01 build #1881: SUCCESS in 3 min 45 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=swy-01/1881/
[09:48] <Riddell> acheronuk: KDE is the original and best open source community making software for the end user.  it's the best place for the project to be hosted
[09:48] <acheronuk> our old bzr branch is behind that, and that KDE version is scarily actually the latest (-l10n changes)
[09:49] <acheronuk> Riddell: ok, I get the promo message. technical or other reason?
[09:50] <acheronuk> I don't overly care, but it is an oddity
[09:50] <Riddell> best place to host it, everyone gets commit access, translations come free, gives visability incase others want to see it
[09:51] <acheronuk> Riddell: ok. that is fair. thanks
[10:49] <BluesKaj> Hi folks
[12:55] <BluesKaj> suddenly my login theme jpg file was replaced by the default on sddm and installing from file wants to unzip an uncompressed jpg , but password fails  ...soemthing really screwed up here
[12:56] <BluesKaj> on Artful
[13:01] <blaze> disc is full
[13:02] <blaze> probably
[15:45] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » linode-01 build #1882: SUCCESS in 53 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=linode-01/1882/
[15:46] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » master build #1882: SUCCESS in 1 min 1 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=master/1882/
[15:48] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » swy-01 build #1882: SUCCESS in 3 min 44 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=swy-01/1882/
[16:49] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Starting build #80 for job mgmt_pause_integration (previous build: ABORTED)
[16:58] <acheronuk> Opinions please? https://phabricator.kde.org/T7394
[16:59] <acheronuk> I think it's high time we cut flash out of that ^^^
 +1
[17:02] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_pause_integration build #80: ABORTED in 13 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_pause_integration/80/
[17:02] <mamarley> ^Something get staged?
[17:03] <acheronuk> mamarley: nope. just doing a bit of mass wrap-and-sort on the frameworks packaging, but nothing actually new
 Did I hear wrap-and-sort? 😁
[17:04] <mamarley> Ah, OK.
[17:18] <MichaelTunnell> acheronuk: I dont think eliminating flash while people still use it is a good idea
[17:18] <MichaelTunnell> how is this notification displayed and where is it displayed?
[17:25] <blaze> acheronuk: +1
 (Photo, 491x205) https://irc-attachments.kde.org/p9f0V0xP/file_3576.jpg
 (Photo, 379x414) https://irc-attachments.kde.org/IqW4WWE2/file_3578.jpg
[17:47] <ahoneybun> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1725169
[17:47] <ahoneybun> people have found a fix in there
[17:58] <acheronuk> ahoneybun: what? at no point on any upgrades I did, did a low latency kernel get installed!
[17:58] <ahoneybun> idk if it was there already or what
[19:15] <valorie> hmmm, I wonder how I would check to see if that was my problem on my failed install on this laptop's 3rd drive
[19:18] <shadeslayer> yofel: happy birthday btw :D
 OMG happy birthday yofel!!!
[19:18] <valorie> oooo, happy happy yofel!
[19:20] <acheronuk> Happy birthday yofel! :)
[19:20] <acheronuk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1728760
[19:20] <acheronuk> not just kubuntu ^^^^
[19:22] <valorie> huh
[19:22] <acheronuk> also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1725609
[19:22] <valorie> but this was a fresh install -- was that lowlatency kernel default?
[19:23] <acheronuk> valorie: may not have been your issue
[19:23] <valorie> hard to know without poking, which I have not
[19:23] <valorie> I switched to testing with my travel laptop instead
[19:25] <valorie> seemed one of the few ways to get the final testing on i386 done
[19:25] <valorie> which is making me lean towards not doing that for the LTS
[20:03] <MichaelTunnell> oh in that case, acheronuk yea that is a bit excessive. However, asking once isnt that bad imo
[20:06] <valorie> MichaelTunnell: but if you click on something that needs flash, the browser will tell you to install it
[20:06] <valorie> IMO that's the important bit - ensuring that that install is successful
[20:07] <valorie> because IMO they never are
[20:11] <MichaelTunnell> the firefox install doesnt use the package manager irrc and that is why there is a success/failure issue of the flash install.
[20:12] <valorie> well, we used to have a "firefox installer"
[20:12] <valorie> do we still?
[20:12] <valorie> not on this laptop but it's not a new install
[20:13] <MichaelTunnell> I think it is using the restricted-extras approach
[20:15] <acheronuk> It installs just flashplugin-installer
[20:25] <valorie> ah, yes that's what it was
[20:25] <valorie> now if only FF would use that to install flash
[20:28] <acheronuk> we would have to run with a patched firefox for KDE. that is too complicated to build, update, maintain, and do proper security due diligence on
[20:29] <valorie> agreed
[20:30] <valorie> and since flash is supposedly dying....
[20:40] <ronnoc> acheronuk: How do the Netrunner and Maui peeps handle Flash? They have the "mozilla-kde-support" package, but not sure if it addresses Flash or not. OTPBH it might be good to look at that package for Kubuntu for other headache-y reasons (proper save dialogues, etc.)
[20:48] <acheronuk> ronnoc: yes, but they still need a custom patched firefox build to use it with, IIRC
[20:48] <acheronuk> + no idea about flash on that
[20:49] <acheronuk> + no idea how FF 57 will impact that either
[20:53] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: see #ubuntu-release :P
[20:56] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: I am
[20:56] <acheronuk> ironically, at the moment I'm having to update flash to get into BBB!
[20:56] <acheronuk> grrrrrrrrrrrr
[20:58] <genii> Gotta love those Catch-22 moments
[21:09] <ronnoc> acheronuk: yea we'd be reliant on their FF release schedule, but really not being bleeding-edge is OK there. Besides, there's the Mozilla Team PPA for those seeking very latest releases. I tried FF 57 but personally not using Firefox these days for a few reasons. And yes, Flash needs to die a fiery, horrific death. 
[21:51] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[21:51] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_kproperty build #8: FIXED in 14 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_kproperty/8/
[21:51] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[21:51] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project artful_stable_kblog build #81: FIXED in 11 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/artful_stable_kblog/81/
[21:52] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[21:52] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project artful_unstable_kproperty build #44: FIXED in 14 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/artful_unstable_kproperty/44/
[22:09] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[22:09] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_unstable_kproperty build #8: FIXED in 31 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_unstable_kproperty/8/
[22:09] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[22:09] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_kreport build #9: FIXED in 17 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_kreport/9/
[22:17] <tsimonq2> No-change rebuilds going for Qt