/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/11/04/#ubuntu-server.txt

FManTropyxyo07:45
FManTropyxI'm thinking of setting up a new VPS, but I started to wonder if I should wait 5 months so that I can get it started straight with fresh 18.0407:46
FManTropyxI know upgrading works, did it from 14.04 to 16.04, but still...07:46
FManTropyxthe spiders crawling through my file server are endless - I thought that they would get satisfied at some point that they have the whole picture :P08:49
FManTropyxis there some tool that lets me cut through all the noise in Apache's access log to filter in just actual user downloads?08:50
=== blackbaba_ is now known as blakebaba
=== blakebaba is now known as blackbaba
gunixguys13:16
gunixi always get annoyed by the weekly kernel updates on ubuntu13:17
gunixanyway to get kernel updates to be less frequent, debian/centos style, once every 2 months?13:17
rbasakgunix: you don't *have* to update.13:51
rbasakYou could watch the USNs and make individual decisions on security updates.13:51
gunixrbasak: is there a way to check if the kernel update is security or not?13:51
gunixcan't apt just say "dude, this is security related, do the update"13:52
gunix?13:52
rbasakhttps://usn.ubuntu.com/usn/13:52
rbasakYou could add an apt pin to lower the priority of non-security updates I think.13:52
rbasakapt does know the difference.13:52
rbasakBut I suspect you may find that virtually every kernel update includes security updates, eg. for drivers you aren't using.13:53
rbasakThere's also https://www.ubuntu.com/server/livepatch13:54
tomreyn...or drivers you ARE using15:12
tomreyngunix: which part annoys you about it? a prompt to install updates, the bandwidth being used during the download, the prompt to reboot after the update succeeded?15:13
tomreynoh we'Re talking server here, so no such prompts, i guess. then what is the issue?15:14
gunixtomreyn: the fact that i always have to reboot the server to stay up to date15:14
gunixyou have to reboot redhat/debian every 2 months, but ubuntu every week15:14
gunixthink about that when running an openstack infrasrtucture15:14
gunixreboot every node once a week15:15
tomreyngunix: well as said before, you don't have to reboot15:15
gunixyea but security update of kernel won't be applied until you reboot15:15
tomreynbut if the other distros only ship kernel security updates less frequently it means they are doing a worse job15:15
tomreynlivepatch was also suggested15:15
gunixlivepatch is risky15:15
gunixcan break the system15:15
tomreynnot rebooting for security updates is also risky15:16
tomreynhow can it "break the system"?15:16
tomreynif you compare it to other distros which make kernel security patches available less frequently, you really need to see it this way: ubuntu provides you an opportunity (but does not at all require) to have a shorter time-to-patch, i.e. you can close security vulnerabilities faster and thus increase the systems' security overall. you can maker use of it, but you don't have to.15:18
tomreynso comparing to the other distros, consider it a free add-on offer.15:19
tomreyn(or, if you care about security, consider ubuntu to do a better job than the others which did not provide those security patches in a timely manner, keeping your system at risk.)15:20
tomreynif patching / maintenances interrupt your service, you should rethink your service architecture15:21
=== WieWoWasWozu is now known as hggdh
=== hggdh is now known as WieWoWasWozu
gunixtomreyn: live migration of instances is not always the best for customers16:26
disposablei've uninstalled lxd (from xenial-backports) from my test xenial server and it left a sizeable /var/lib/lxd behind. when i try deleting it, i get "/var/lib/lxd/storage-pools/default/images...... Read-only filesystem"  How do i get rid of this directory? i've already dpkg purged everything lxc/lxd related.16:31
disposableand i don't see anything relevant in /proc/mounts17:38
tomreyngunix: yes, sometimes HA is17:54
disposablenevermind, lxd created those directories as btrfs subvolumes.18:12
MartesZibellinaHello!18:14
MartesZibellinaI have a problem - my system doesn't recognise my network adapter, TL-WN721N, after the 1st reboot.18:15
MartesZibellinaUSB tethering with my phone doesn't work either.18:16
oerheksMartesZibellina, what does lsusb/lspci say about that wireless TL-WN721N?19:05
MartesZibellinaIt IS recognised, but the network manager says "Device not ready".19:26
JanCMartesZibellina: lsusb/lspci knowing its name doesn't mean there is a driver20:23
JanCseems like there are at least two different adapters with that name...20:26
JanCsorry, *five*20:26
JanCthree with Atheros chips and two with Realtek chips20:27
JanCMartesZibellina: does it tell you what version it is?20:29
JanCor check what the USB ID is20:29
JanCthe USB ID would look like "0cf3:9170" or "2357:0107"20:32
JanCthe version would likely also be printed on the adapter itself (but might be hard to recognize as such)20:34
=== tomaw_ is now known as tomaw

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!