[11:13] <bluesabre> Nice to see sn-plug and pa-plug just work in the daily iso :)
[11:13] <bluesabre> flocculant: will review and respond a bit later
[11:45] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [bionic] r328 First bionic release (by Sean Davis)
[11:59] <knome> one thing i'd really want to see is an etherpad with side-by-side diff
[13:43] <knome> slickymasterWork, https://code.launchpad.net/~knome/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/xubuntu-1804
[13:44] <knome> this is very barebones and artwork hasn't really been touched - except that most of it is dropped
[13:44] <knome> note that this is a considerably smaller window and two slides shorter than the current slideshow -- intentionally
[13:45] <knome> now, bbl
[14:43] <slickymasterWork> knome, minor changes/suggestions in the pad
[14:44] <slickymasterWork> overall I agree with the drop of those three slides
[14:45] <slickymasterWork> do you already hace something in mind to the Artwork: Ubuntu + Xfce = Xubuntu replacement?
[14:45] <slickymasterWork> s/hace/have
[14:45] <slickymasterWork> flocculant ^^^
[15:07] <knome> slickymasterWork, in the branch i pushed i just replaced it with the xubuntu logo
[15:07] <knome> but tbh, we likely want to add artwork to other slides as well
[15:07] <knome> just a starting point
[15:07] <knome> bbl
[15:22] <slickymasterWork> knome, just fyi your branch ins't running the slideshow
[15:23] <slickymasterWork> ./test-slideshow.sh dies silently after choosing xubuntu
[15:28] <jbicha> slickymasterWork: install gir1.2-webkit-3.0
[15:28] <jbicha> the bad part is that package will be removed before Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is released, someone needs to port the test app to webkit2
[15:32] <slickymasterWork> don't think it's that jbicha, I have gir1.2-webkit-3.0
[15:32] <slickymasterWork> any way, we're still working on the slideshow so nothing to serious
[15:33] <slickymasterWork> s/to/too
[15:33] <jbicha> I'm curious if y'all have thought about shipping ubuntu-software by default instead of gnome-software
[15:34] <jbicha> basically do you want it branded as Ubuntu Software or GNOME Software?
[15:35] <jbicha> I think there's a bug where even if ubuntu-software is installed it won't use the Ubuntu branding on Xfce but I think I can fix that
[15:39] <jbicha> hmm, let me think about this bug some more
[15:39] <slickymasterWork> :)
[15:40] <jbicha> I'm trying to think if there is any reason why someone wouldn't want the Ubuntu Software branding except if they're trying to run vanilla GNOME
[15:42] <slickymasterWork> in all cases any change to the shipped packages will always have to go through the Xub-Council, jbicha 
[15:43] <jbicha> well I guess it depends on how this bug is fixed ;)
[15:43] <slickymasterWork> lol
[15:43] <jbicha> here I'll file a bug and show you what I mean
[15:58] <jbicha> LP: #1731296
[16:07] <knome> jbicha, ubuntu software is more appropriate
[16:09] <jbicha> yeah, I'm leaning to #3, #2 would require action from all the flavors to opt in if they wanted the Ubuntu Software branding
[16:10] <slickymasterWork> seriously doubt ubuntu gnome would go with it
[16:11] <jbicha> there is no separate Ubuntu GNOME, but #3 also opts out vanilla GNOME anyway :)
[16:12] <slickymasterWork> true
[18:04] <flocculant> bluesabre: ack
[18:14] <flocculant> slickymasterWork: tried the iso ? really slow to load here on kvm
[18:14] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: ^^
[18:15] <flocculant> if it does
[18:21] <slickymasterWork> haven't tried the iso flocculant 
[18:21] <flocculant> okey doke
[18:21] <slickymasterWork> just went with sudo sed -i 's/artful/bionic/g' /etc/apt/sources.list from artful install 
[18:27] <flocculant> well yea - me too ages ago it feels like, iso's landed so I tested it 
[18:27] <flocculant> or tried
[18:36] <slickymasterWork> I'll download the iso tonight and will give it a try tomorrow, over here
[19:02] <slickymasterWork> heading home ->
[22:01] <ochosi> bluesabre: shall we finalize the proposal of gtk3/4.14 packages that we want in 18.04?
[22:01] <ochosi> finalize in the sense of making it public
[22:02] <ochosi> and in the sense of starting to get the packages and PPAs in shape
[22:17] <ochosi> hmm, compiling fails while running a distribution upgrade
[22:17] <ochosi> i guess that's not a huge suprise :p
[22:17] <knome> heh
[22:17] <knome> better that way
[22:40] <ochosi> well the results could have been interesting :)
[22:41] <knome> heh
[22:43] <ochosi> anyway, i'm considering to run bionic on a daily basis
[22:43] <knome> good luck
[22:43] <ochosi> that should also help us with taking more informed decisions about what to incldue
[22:43] <knome> sure
[23:33] <bluesabre> ochosi: sounds good to me
[23:34] <bluesabre> ochosi: annoyingly, I've lost the link :D
[23:34] <bluesabre> nvm, found it, http://pad.ubuntu.com/PyIIYsyIfn