[01:19]  * tsimonq2 hopes that nobody else will upload a no-change rebuild of qtbase so the Qt transition isn't delayed by another week because of the obnoxious queues...
[01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[02:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[09:22] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, libsdl2 will migrate once the ffmpeg test is finished
[09:22] <LocutusOfBorg> it is not a transition
[09:22] <LocutusOfBorg> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_output_notest.txt
[09:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't see that entangling TBH
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-widest-line [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2-1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2+dfsg-1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu-contrib [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2+dfsg-1]
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsdl2 (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.4+dfsg1-2ubuntu2 => 2.0.4+dfsg1-2ubuntu2.16.04.1] (lubuntu, ubuntukylin)
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, to avoid you loosing time: https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/13712897 this seems to be a problem
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> needs upstream patching and there seems to be none, I'm opening an issue
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> https://github.com/jgm/gitit/issues/607
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-ansi-align [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-ansi-align [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[19:53] <juliank> Bug 1613184 is not actually triggered on xenial, but it seems pointless to pull back the SRU for that - it might help third-party code, who knows. We should do our best next week to get these apt SRUs out, I've tried verifying them as far as possible now.
[19:55]  * juliank could write a small program and test it manually
[21:15] <infinity> juliank: I have nothing against fixing one too many bugs.
[21:16] <juliank> infinity: Apparently the major fix for the unattended-upgrades graceful termination is wrong too, though. Never kills anything since sh does not forward signals to children.
[21:16] <juliank> bug 1690980, that is
[21:17] <juliank> Not sure what the behavior is on shutdown now
[21:17] <juliank> So we might have to do new SRUs anyway :/
[21:17] <infinity> Fun.
[21:20] <juliank> Maybe rbalint has some time to test this properly next week, it's his patch after all :)
[21:20] <juliank> (during shutdown, that is)
[21:21] <juliank> If it still works on shutdown, then it's suboptimal but still fixes the issue :)
[21:21] <juliank> Though it might wait endlessly for an upgrade to complete, who knows
[21:21] <infinity> Isn't that sort of the point?
[21:22] <infinity> The bug was that it wasn't waiting.
[21:22] <juliank> Sort of. We have it exit early, though
[21:23] <juliank> When it's safe to do so
[21:23] <infinity> terminating mid-install is almost never safe.
[21:24] <juliank> u-u has special logic for that sort of thing to complete to a safe state and then exit
[21:25] <juliank> But let's discuss that thing next week :)
[21:25] <infinity> Yeah, I'm only barely awake.
[21:25] <infinity> Plus Saturday.
[21:25] <infinity> Plus I clearly lost some context on this one.
[21:25] <infinity> Not surpising, given the months of back and forth.
[21:25] <infinity> Nor surprising.
[21:26] <juliank> But let's just summarize that shell sucks
[21:27] <infinity> Well, yes.  It does.  But we can make it not suck for this case, I'm just curious what the actual use-case *is*.
[21:35] <juliank> But if we do, we can at least pull in "ignore unsupported key formats in apt-key" as well - people are going to be so happy about it :)
[21:35] <juliank> (I think it actually writes warnings, though, not silently ignores them :D)