[01:19] * tsimonq2 hopes that nobody else will upload a no-change rebuild of qtbase so the Qt transition isn't delayed by another week because of the obnoxious queues... [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [02:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:22] doko, libsdl2 will migrate once the ffmpeg test is finished [09:22] it is not a transition [09:22] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_output_notest.txt [09:23] I don't see that entangling TBH [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-widest-line [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2-1] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2+dfsg-1] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu-contrib [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2+dfsg-1] [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsdl2 (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.4+dfsg1-2ubuntu2 => 2.0.4+dfsg1-2ubuntu2.16.04.1] (lubuntu, ubuntukylin) [10:49] slangasek, to avoid you loosing time: https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/13712897 this seems to be a problem [10:49] needs upstream patching and there seems to be none, I'm opening an issue [10:50] https://github.com/jgm/gitit/issues/607 [11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-ansi-align [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-ansi-align [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) [17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) [17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpm [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.14.0+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) [19:53] Bug 1613184 is not actually triggered on xenial, but it seems pointless to pull back the SRU for that - it might help third-party code, who knows. We should do our best next week to get these apt SRUs out, I've tried verifying them as far as possible now. [19:53] bug 1613184 in apt (Ubuntu Zesty) "method mirror broken at 1.3" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1613184 [19:55] * juliank could write a small program and test it manually [21:15] juliank: I have nothing against fixing one too many bugs. [21:16] infinity: Apparently the major fix for the unattended-upgrades graceful termination is wrong too, though. Never kills anything since sh does not forward signals to children. [21:16] bug 1690980, that is [21:16] bug 1690980 in OEM Priority Project xenial "unattended-upgrades does not block shutdown of system, as it is designed to" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1690980 [21:17] Not sure what the behavior is on shutdown now [21:17] So we might have to do new SRUs anyway :/ [21:17] Fun. [21:20] Maybe rbalint has some time to test this properly next week, it's his patch after all :) [21:20] (during shutdown, that is) [21:21] If it still works on shutdown, then it's suboptimal but still fixes the issue :) [21:21] Though it might wait endlessly for an upgrade to complete, who knows [21:21] Isn't that sort of the point? [21:22] The bug was that it wasn't waiting. [21:22] Sort of. We have it exit early, though [21:23] When it's safe to do so [21:23] terminating mid-install is almost never safe. [21:24] u-u has special logic for that sort of thing to complete to a safe state and then exit [21:25] But let's discuss that thing next week :) [21:25] Yeah, I'm only barely awake. [21:25] Plus Saturday. [21:25] Plus I clearly lost some context on this one. [21:25] Not surpising, given the months of back and forth. [21:25] Nor surprising. [21:26] But let's just summarize that shell sucks [21:27] Well, yes. It does. But we can make it not suck for this case, I'm just curious what the actual use-case *is*. [21:35] But if we do, we can at least pull in "ignore unsupported key formats in apt-key" as well - people are going to be so happy about it :) [21:35] (I think it actually writes warnings, though, not silently ignores them :D)