| didrocks | good morning | 07:10 |
|---|---|---|
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 08:32 |
| didrocks | re seb128 | 08:34 |
| seb128 | re :) | 08:34 |
| willcooke | morning | 08:48 |
| thumper | o/ willcooke | 08:49 |
| thumper | o/ seb128 and didrocks | 08:49 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke, evening thumper :) | 08:49 |
| seb128 | hey willcooke thumper | 08:49 |
| seb128 | how are you? | 08:49 |
| thumper | good | 08:49 |
| thumper | spending my time tonight looking for a resource leak | 08:49 |
| thumper | just found it | 08:49 |
| thumper | running test suite with the fix to see if I broke anything else :) | 08:50 |
| didrocks | thumper: juju was mentioned on the 8 year celebration blog post of Go ;) | 08:50 |
| thumper | oh? | 08:50 |
| didrocks | https://blog.golang.org/8years | 08:50 |
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers! | 08:53 |
| didrocks | hey hey oSoMoN | 08:53 |
| oSoMoN | salut didrocks, ça va? | 08:58 |
| didrocks | ça va bien, et toi ? | 08:59 |
| seb128 | lut oSoMoN | 09:00 |
| oSoMoN | salut seb128 | 09:00 |
| oSoMoN | bien | 09:00 |
| oSoMoN | pas très reposé, mais bien :) | 09:01 |
| oSoMoN | didrocks, seb128: when you have a moment, please add a word of support or two to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OlivierTilloy/PPUApplication | 09:02 |
| Laney | hey hey | 09:02 |
| oSoMoN | hey Laney | 09:02 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, oh, sure | 09:03 |
| seb128 | hey Laney, how are you? good w.e? | 09:03 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, le w.e c'est fait pour s'amuser et la semaine pour se reposer non ? ;-) | 09:03 |
| didrocks | morning Laney | 09:04 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, ça c’est la théorie… :) | 09:05 |
| seb128 | :-) | 09:05 |
| Laney | hey oSoMoN didrocks seb128 | 09:06 |
| Laney | seb128: great! | 09:06 |
| Laney | family visiting, went for walks / beer / meals | 09:06 |
| Laney | you? | 09:06 |
| oSoMoN | I had a gargantuan raclette for lunch yesterday, that was the highlight of the week-end :) | 09:08 |
| Laney | :D | 09:09 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, so LO in bionic is still failing to build because linebreak functionality is broken with ICU 60. There's an upstream bug report (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113705) but they don't seem to be in a hurry to address it. Do you reckon I should invest time in fixing it myself, or do we skip the corresponding unit test temporarily to allow the package to build, knowing that actual functional | 09:11 |
| oSoMoN | ity is broken? | 09:11 |
| ubot5 | bugs.documentfoundation.org bug 113705 in framework "linebreak unit test failure when building against libicu 60.1" [Normal,Assigned] | 09:11 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, do we need the update to migrate now? or is it fine to keep it in proposed for a while? | 09:13 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, it's fine to have it in proposed, but it's blocking the 5.4.2 SRU for artful | 09:15 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, do you know what user visible impact it has? like what is not working correctly in libreoffice? | 09:15 |
| oSoMoN | linebreak is not going to work correctly | 09:16 |
| oSoMoN | this will be most visible in writer | 09:16 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, SRUs don't require to have the change out of proposed, just to have it uploaded so it doesn't get forgotten | 09:16 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, ah that's a good point, then I'll ping the SRU team to unblock it | 09:16 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, seb128, hi, lo is the last item blocking the icu transition to complete | 09:17 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, thanks | 09:17 |
| oSoMoN | yeah, I know | 09:17 |
| seb128 | ricotz, well, somebody who cares about icu needs to fix that bug then | 09:17 |
| seb128 | and hey :) | 09:17 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, I got the impression it is "just" an behaviour change, e.g. icu/unicode allows breaks on "/" to wrap url or the like | 09:17 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, but in any case we are not forcing in buggy softwares so that option isn't a valid one | 09:17 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, I would keep it in proposed for now until somebody who cares enough investigate/fixes it | 09:18 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, but this is better to be investigated by upstream | 09:19 |
| seb128 | (which might end up being us, but I wouldn't drop everything else for that yet) | 09:19 |
| ricotz | I would assume upstream bumps to icu 60 with lo 6.0 which will result in a more pressing need for them to fix it | 09:20 |
| oSoMoN | ricotz, I agree, but it doesn't look like they're very interested in fixing it, given that they ship an older copy of ICU with LO | 09:20 |
| oSoMoN | ricotz, is there any strong indication they intend to bump to 60 with 6.0 ? | 09:20 |
| oSoMoN | or just an assumption? | 09:20 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, right, especially for the 5.4 branch, but the fix should be backportable | 09:21 |
| ricotz | just an assumption | 09:21 |
| oSoMoN | what I can do is test writer in an i386 VM and see the extent of the linebreak issue | 09:21 |
| oSoMoN | if it's not too bad then we can just skip the unit test temporarily | 09:22 |
| ricotz | I agree | 09:24 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, fyi, I will copy 5.4.3 to the main PPAs later today | 09:26 |
| andyrock | seb128: hey regarding gnome-disk-utility showing snap squashfs | 09:26 |
| seb128 | hey andyrock | 09:26 |
| andyrock | gnome-disk-utility maintainers agreed to accept the patch to skip devices marked as UDISK_IGNORED | 09:27 |
| andyrock | but we still need to add an udev rule somewhere | 09:27 |
| andyrock | maybe inside the snap deb package? | 09:27 |
| seb128 | andyrock, oh, nice | 09:29 |
| seb128 | andyrock, do you have an idea what the udev rule would be already? | 09:29 |
| oSoMoN | ricotz, ack, thanks | 09:30 |
| andyrock | seb128: I've already a working one. Let me check if I can make it less generic | 09:37 |
| andyrock | making sure it will filter just snap squashfs | 09:37 |
| seb128 | andyrock, right, I'm asking because it might make sense in different packages according to what is in the rule | 09:37 |
| seb128 | andyrock, if you have a way to flag snaps mount only the snapd package makes sense imho | 09:38 |
| Laney | indeed | 09:42 |
| andyrock | mmm skipping ignored devices is not an option anymore | 10:08 |
| andyrock | we could filter for devices mounted in /snap | 10:09 |
| andyrock | but does snapd mounts always in /snap in all ditros? | 10:09 |
| seb128 | andyrock, that's a question for #snappy or the snapcraft forum | 10:12 |
| ricotz | chrisccoulson, hi, do you have a moment? | 11:44 |
| bigon | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1713457 << an idea about this? | 12:10 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1713457 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "DNS search domain not removed from resolv.conf on disconnect" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 12:10 |
| bigon | this is quite annoying | 12:10 |
| seb128 | bigon, I don't think we have much n-m people around, maybe cyphermox or xnox on #ubuntu-devel would know | 12:24 |
| zhaoqiang | hi | 12:30 |
| seb128 | bigon, you might want to report it upstream, more chance to get a reply there | 12:35 |
| Laney | andyrock: out of interest, why is not an option? | 12:40 |
| seb128 | didrocks, uploading https://launchpadlibrarian.net/344786398/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock_0.8.1_source.changes to artful was an error right? (it's in the queue, asking before rejecting) | 12:48 |
| seb128 | Laney, willcooke, do you if robert plans to do a gnome-software SRU to 17.10 and when? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/gnome-software/ubuntu-artful has quite some segfaults & other issues fixed, it would probably make sense to do an upload now | 12:51 |
| Laney | not sure but 3.26.2 came out the other day | 12:53 |
| seb128 | he was waiting on that? | 12:53 |
| jbicha | bigon: do you experience that NM bug on Debian too? | 12:54 |
| Laney | I don't know, but it would be sensible to upload that | 12:55 |
| bigon | jbicha, seb128 it's the laptop of a coleague | 12:55 |
| bigon | IIRC I don't see that on debian | 12:56 |
| bigon | could be a problem with resolvconf | 12:56 |
| ogra_ | resolvconf is dead and gone (well ... to universe) | 12:57 |
| seb128 | systemd-resolved? | 12:58 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 12:58 |
| andyrock | Laney: there are other partitions marked with the HintIgnore that should be shown | 13:02 |
| bigon | it's not installed by default in 17.10 | 13:06 |
| bigon | ? | 13:06 |
| bigon | mmh | 13:06 |
| bigon | vpnc is pulling it on that laptop | 13:06 |
| bigon | 13:57 < ogra_> resolvconf is dead and gone (well ... to universe) << uninstalling resolveconf is fixing the probleme here | 13:27 |
| ogra_ | do-release-upgrade or update-manager should have removed it actually | 13:27 |
| bigon | it's pulled by vpnc | 13:28 |
| bigon | (or vpn-scripts) | 13:28 |
| koza | willcooke, hey man, what are the chances PA 11 lands in bionic? rmadison shows v10 packaged as of today | 13:30 |
| ogra_ | bigon, ah, that should be fixed then | 13:34 |
| willcooke | koza, pretty good, duflu was looking at it before hols. 1 sec | 13:35 |
| willcooke | koza, https://trello.com/c/2Cy6kdqt | 13:35 |
| koza | willcooke, sweet | 13:52 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, fyi, https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/44665/ | 13:53 |
| willcooke | restart, brb | 14:17 |
| === Trevinho|off is now known as Trevinho | ||
| Trevinho | Hola desktoppers! | 14:23 |
| Trevinho | I'm back to the digital world.... | 14:23 |
| willcooke | hey Trevinho! How you doing :) | 14:23 |
| seb128 | hey Trevinho! welcome back! how are you? | 14:23 |
| seb128 | still in America? | 14:23 |
| Trevinho | Hi willcooke and seb128... | 14:23 |
| Trevinho | Yeah, México | 14:23 |
| Trevinho | But I had great time in Cuba | 14:23 |
| seb128 | did you have good holidays? did you manage to really stay away from the keyboard? :) | 14:24 |
| seb128 | nice! | 14:24 |
| Trevinho | A place to be | 14:24 |
| Trevinho | Yes | 14:24 |
| Trevinho | No laptops with me... No connection a part in some public parks where it's 1$/hour | 14:24 |
| Trevinho | And not really reliable | 14:24 |
| seb128 | nice | 14:25 |
| Trevinho | So... Lots of social interactions, using the great social network they have there in human relationships | 14:25 |
| Trevinho | Basically what we have here with airbnb and uber, there exists for years just using the word of mouth | 14:26 |
| ogra_ | uuh ... VoA protocol .. scary | 14:28 |
| oSoMoN | welcome back Trevinho | 14:32 |
| Laney | hey Trevinho | 14:32 |
| Laney | happy email day | 14:32 |
| oSoMoN | ricotz, interesting. I don't see changes related to linebreak though | 14:34 |
| Trevinho | Hi oSoMoN and Laney | 14:34 |
| ricotz | oSoMoN, yes, not part of it and this is blocked by your bug report of course, but there is movement | 14:42 |
| didrocks | seb128: ok, I'm having a déja-vu impression, I thought I removed it (and yeah, grrrr dch -r "") | 14:50 |
| didrocks | seb128: deleting it, I have the page opened | 14:51 |
| seb128 | didrocks, k, thanks | 14:51 |
| didrocks | thanks for noticing :) | 14:51 |
| seb128 | np! | 14:51 |
| didrocks | ah | 14:51 |
| didrocks | Rejection comment required. | 14:51 |
| didrocks | probably why it didn't remove (I'm only adding them for others ;)) | 14:51 |
| seb128 | "do what I say" | 14:51 |
| seb128 | :p | 14:51 |
| didrocks | heh | 14:51 |
| didrocks | so, I wasn't dreaming I tried to remove it already :p | 14:52 |
| seb128 | I've probably got bitten by that a few times as well | 14:52 |
| oSoMoN | ricotz, that's encouraging | 14:59 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| ricotz | chrisccoulson, ping | 16:10 |
| ricotz | see pm | 16:13 |
| seb128 | ricotz, you maybe better ask on channels, other might be able to help? | 16:21 |
| ricotz | seb128, it is a very-specific firefox packaging problem which also hit the current 57 build due some late cherry-picking | 16:22 |
| seb128 | k | 16:22 |
| ricotz | thanks, but honestly you can't help here | 16:23 |
| seb128 | well we are trying to get out of Chris being the only one to look at firefox | 16:23 |
| seb128 | that doesn't work if people ping him only directly | 16:23 |
| ricotz | I know, this part is more trial and error for me still | 16:24 |
| ricotz | regarding distro-specific searchplugins patching | 16:24 |
| ricotz | is there some mass-rebuilding of snaps going on? | 16:26 |
| ricotz | seb128, ^ | 16:27 |
| * Laney doesn't know of one if there is | 16:45 | |
| kenvandine | ricotz, i've been building a bunch of snaps today :) | 16:49 |
| kenvandine | all done now though | 16:49 |
| seb128 | ricotz, k | 17:01 |
| ricotz | kenvandine, ah, I see | 17:05 |
| chrisccoulson | hi ricotz | 17:39 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, I'll take a look at that issue | 17:39 |
| ricotz | chrisccoulson, I have reverted the corresponding changes https://paste.debian.net/plain/995512 | 17:40 |
| ricotz | but I guess a proper fix to deal with those would be nice | 17:41 |
| * kenvandine just realized that "snap refresh" will refresh all installed snaps | 18:02 | |
| kenvandine | wished i had discovered that sooner :) | 18:02 |
| ricotz | chrisccoulson, is this the only change you made compared to the beta branches? https://paste.debian.net/plain/995518 | 18:08 |
| === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
| === Guest38279 is now known as RAOF | ||
| jbicha | robert_ancell: good afternoon | 23:56 |
| jbicha | we were wondering today/yesterday whether you were going to be doing a gnome-software/artful SRU soon since 3.26.2 was released recently | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!