[07:14] good morning desktoppers === krashekspress_ is now known as krashekspress [07:24] good morning [07:26] salut didrocks, ça va? [07:29] ça va bien oSoMoN, et toi ? [07:29] malgré un nuit agitée, et réveillé plusieurs fois :p (rah, ces dents…) [07:30] ça va, merci [07:31] dormi peu, mais en une seule fois :) [07:38] héhé [08:28] good morning desktopers [08:29] re seb128 [08:29] re didrocks :) [09:02] ho ho ho [09:02] hey Laney, how are you? [09:03] hey seb128 [09:03] doing good thanks, what about you? [09:03] good day off? [09:03] I'm good but tired [09:04] yes, mostly, but looking after a kid takes more energy than working, happy to sit down at the computer today :p [09:04] hey Laney ;) [09:09] heyyyy didrocks [09:45] snapd 2.29 released, let's remove fonts from snaps! [09:45] cool [09:45] that seems like a faster release cycle than last time? [09:47] dunno, to me it seems like I've been waiting for that one forever :) [10:11] oSoMoN, btw I uploaded the artful libreoffice with fixed version [10:16] seb128, I saw that and was about to thank you when you disappeared. Thanks! [10:23] yw! [10:23] sorry, I changed location ... would be nice of we had a company IRC proxy :-/ [10:33] seb128, I use znc on a canonistack instance, but indeed it would be nice if we had a generic solution [10:50] ooh ugly square Firefox tabs ;P [10:52] but feels faster :) [11:05] ricotz, I'll take a look at those packaging changes today, thanks [11:24] chrisccoulson, thanks, note that the current i386 failure (58 and 59) on xenial is probably a rustc problem, maybe even OOM [11:25] yeah, that doesn't surprise me. The rustc build hits OOM on i386 too [11:25] also only on xenial? [11:26] trusty, but if that's the case then it's marginal everywhere [11:27] I see, reducing the parallel builds could help since g++ is pretty heavy too [11:27] it's not strictly a OOM either - it's running out of address space, so reducing parallelism won't really help [11:28] ok [12:53] chrisccoulson, btw, I disabled the unity patch for 58+ again, does this patch has any future? [12:56] jbicha, this seems to be something to look forward for bionic -- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1283299 [12:56] Mozilla bug 1283299 in Widget: Gtk "Implement titlebar rendering on GTK 3.20+" [Normal,Assigned] [13:23] going to cafe for lunch, back in a bit [13:58] hey, silly question - I had to restore a backup on my laptop (long story) using deja-dup and this worked great (yay). however it seems like my window settings (focus-follow-mouse, mouse buttons) and keybindings for e.g. gnome-terminal are not restrored. is that a known issue? did I do anything wrong? or a known issue? [14:00] mvo: hey, this is stored in dconf normally, are your other values stored in dconf restored? [14:00] mvo: the file is ~/.config/dconf/user [14:01] however, restoring it while dconf is running… I don't think that works [14:01] (and maybe dconf-service will erase it with what it has in memory) [14:02] didrocks: aha, that would make sense. I restored it while dconf was running (from a normal user sessoin) [14:02] didrocks: I will poke around, maybe I can temporarly suspsend dconf or something [14:02] mvo: just a thoery :) I'm afraid that dconf-service may be respawn as a dbus activated service in a graphical session, maybe shut down your session and restore from a tty? [14:03] theory* [14:04] didrocks: hm, thanks. I'm too lazy to learn how to restore using cli :/ I will experiment a bit [14:05] mvo: the clean way of course is to mv dconf-service dconf-service.disable, kill the process, restore the file and mv back ;) [14:06] didrocks: indeed, let me poke at it a little bit [14:06] didrocks: thanks for your help! [14:06] yw! keep me posted :) [14:07] * mgedmin would hope a user-friendly backup program would know how to do dcomp dump + dcomp load properly ... [14:08] mgedmin: dconf* you meant, but yeah, agreed, it should be a simple patch even ;) [14:08] * mgedmin kan't sple [14:58] ricotz, chrisccoulson: can you build the firefox 58 betas with csd and wayland enabled? The code for that should be now available in the official codebase. [15:05] Not in the official builds but on the firefox-next ppa [15:06] And just for artful and bionic? [15:20] amano_, hi, no, I won't treat the beta builds different since this is what will land in the archive after the beta cycle has finished [15:23] if those features are tested upstream and enabled by default it should be be avaible already or will be when upstream decides to [15:28] _amano, I guess you didnt get any of my messages [15:47] tkamppeter, hey, could you have a look to https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/request-autoconnection-of-cups-control-for-libreoffice/2517 and reply to the pending questions there? [15:55] I'm not getting any notifications about available security updates in ubuntu gnome 17.10, why is that? [15:56] sometimes I get a gnome-software notification about updates, but when I click I get a screen saying everything's up to date [15:56] hitting Refresh sometimes shows me flatpak platform runtime updates, nothing else [15:57] (sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get upgrade -d in a terminal shows me there are available security updates for e.g. webkit) [15:59] Software doesn't tell you about deb package updates, that's the job of Sofware Updater [16:00] and that's supposed to notify daily if there are security updates iirc [16:00] is that the new name of update-manager? I've got it installed, but never saw any notifications [16:03] oh, I see I set it to download and install security updates automatically at some point [16:03] maybe it actually does? strange that I never noticed [16:06] ISTR that maybe unattended-upgrades is installed by default now [16:16] seb128, I have answered there. [16:29] tkamppeter, thanks [17:02] hi guys [17:02] anyone can publish this for me https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3039 ? [17:03] * Trevinho survived to the upgrade to Firefox Quantum.... Enhoying the new speed with less extensions :) [17:14] hey Trevinho [17:15] hi seb128, allright? [17:15] yes! [17:15] you? [17:26] andyrock, you said you would update the SRU description according to Brian's comment on bug #1703046? [17:26] bug 1703046 in indicator-printers (Ubuntu) "indicator-printers-service crashed with SIGSEGV in __GI_____strtol_l_internal()" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1703046 [17:27] Trevinho, I published your silo [17:29] seb128: thanks... [17:29] yw! [17:29] seb128: and yes.. I'm good.. [18:45] Hi [18:46] i am using GNOME and could not reduce the SIZE of my Desktop Icons. [18:47] i have many file and folders on my Desktop and ICON Size is very Huge. [18:47] I've tried many ways and could not reduce the ICON Size. [18:48] Could someone help / point out on what i am missing here ? [18:55] Laney: hey, what are you using now with quantum instead of vimfx or other similar extensions? [18:56] I've been using saka-key so far, but there are some missing things (due to the webext arch I guess) === Guest7945 is now known as Spydar007 [19:36] seb128: didn't I? [19:37] ah [19:37] i forgot the errors.ubuntu.com link [19:42] done [19:42] sorry about that [19:52] B01: I also think I have that issue randomly.. right now the icons are huge on the desktop - last boot I swear they weren't [19:53] I haven't had time to debug it at all though [19:53] andyrock, np, thanks [19:54] B01: open up Files/Nautilus and do Ctrl and "-" to reduce both sizes... [20:59] @gQuigs, it is on my Desktop [20:59] where there are many files. [21:00] not in other directories. [21:03] hmm, for me it shows the consistent size from Files/Nautilus (guess I could have accidentally Ctrl and + in a directory) [21:11] the icon size is supposed to be global now; there is no per-directory icon size option any more [21:14] @jbicha, i would like to reduce the size of all the objects / icons on my desktop. [21:14] i could not do that somehow. [21:24] B01: open the Files app, open the ☰ menu, click the - icon. The lowest it goes is 50%