[07:14] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[07:24] <didrocks> good morning
[07:26] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks, ça va?
[07:29] <didrocks> ça va bien oSoMoN, et toi ?
[07:29] <didrocks> malgré un nuit agitée, et réveillé plusieurs fois :p (rah, ces dents…)
[07:30] <oSoMoN> ça va, merci
[07:31] <oSoMoN> dormi peu, mais en une seule fois :)
[07:38] <didrocks> héhé
[08:28] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:29] <didrocks> re seb128
[08:29] <seb128> re didrocks :)
[09:02] <Laney> ho ho ho
[09:02] <seb128> hey Laney, how are you?
[09:03] <Laney> hey seb128
[09:03] <Laney> doing good thanks, what about you?
[09:03] <Laney> good day off?
[09:03] <seb128> I'm good but tired
[09:04] <seb128> yes, mostly, but looking after a kid takes more energy than working, happy to sit down at the computer today :p
[09:04] <didrocks> hey Laney ;)
[09:09] <Laney> heyyyy didrocks
[09:45] <oSoMoN> snapd 2.29 released, let's remove fonts from snaps!
[09:45] <Laney> cool
[09:45] <Laney> that seems like a faster release cycle than last time?
[09:47] <oSoMoN> dunno, to me it seems like I've been waiting for that one forever :)
[10:11] <seb128> oSoMoN, btw I uploaded the artful libreoffice with fixed version
[10:16] <oSoMoN> seb128, I saw that and was about to thank you when you disappeared. Thanks!
[10:23] <seb128> yw!
[10:23] <seb128> sorry, I changed location ... would be nice of we had a company IRC proxy :-/
[10:33] <oSoMoN> seb128, I use znc on a canonistack instance, but indeed it would be nice if we had a generic solution
[10:50] <Saviq> ooh ugly square Firefox tabs ;P
[10:52] <Saviq> but feels faster :)
[11:05] <chrisccoulson> ricotz, I'll take a look at those packaging changes today, thanks
[11:24] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, thanks, note that the current i386 failure (58 and 59) on xenial is probably a rustc problem, maybe even OOM
[11:25] <chrisccoulson> yeah, that doesn't surprise me. The rustc build hits OOM on i386 too
[11:25] <ricotz> also only on xenial?
[11:26] <chrisccoulson> trusty, but if that's the case then it's marginal everywhere
[11:27] <ricotz> I see, reducing the parallel builds could help since g++ is pretty heavy too
[11:27] <chrisccoulson> it's not strictly a OOM either - it's running out of address space, so reducing parallelism won't really help
[11:28] <ricotz> ok
[12:53] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, btw, I disabled the unity patch for 58+ again, does this patch has any future?
[12:56] <ricotz> jbicha, this seems to be something to look forward for bionic -- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1283299
[13:23] <Laney> going to cafe for lunch, back in a bit
[13:58] <mvo> hey, silly question - I had to restore a backup on my laptop (long story) using deja-dup and this worked great (yay). however it seems like my window settings (focus-follow-mouse, mouse buttons) and keybindings for e.g. gnome-terminal are not restrored. is that a known issue? did I do anything wrong? or a known issue?
[14:00] <didrocks> mvo: hey, this is stored in dconf normally, are your other values stored in dconf restored?
[14:00] <didrocks> mvo: the file is ~/.config/dconf/user
[14:01] <didrocks> however, restoring it while dconf is running… I don't think that works
[14:01] <didrocks> (and maybe dconf-service will erase it with what it has in memory)
[14:02] <mvo> didrocks: aha, that would make sense. I restored it while dconf was running (from a normal user sessoin)
[14:02] <mvo> didrocks: I will poke around, maybe I can temporarly suspsend dconf or something
[14:02] <didrocks> mvo: just a thoery :) I'm afraid that dconf-service may be respawn as a dbus activated service in a graphical session, maybe shut down your session and restore from a tty?
[14:03] <didrocks> theory*
[14:04] <mvo> didrocks: hm, thanks. I'm too lazy to learn how to restore using cli :/ I will experiment a bit
[14:05] <didrocks> mvo: the clean way of course is to mv dconf-service dconf-service.disable, kill the process, restore the file and mv back ;)
[14:06] <mvo> didrocks: indeed, let me poke at it a little bit
[14:06] <mvo> didrocks: thanks for your help!
[14:06] <didrocks> yw! keep me posted :)
[14:07]  * mgedmin would hope a user-friendly backup program would know how to do dcomp dump + dcomp load properly ...
[14:08] <didrocks> mgedmin: dconf* you meant, but yeah, agreed, it should be a simple patch even ;)
[14:08]  * mgedmin kan't sple
[14:58] <amano> ricotz, chrisccoulson: can you build the firefox 58 betas with csd and wayland enabled? The code for that should be now available in the official codebase.
[15:05] <amano_> Not in the official builds but on the firefox-next ppa
[15:06] <amano_> And just for artful and bionic?
[15:20] <ricotz> amano_, hi, no, I won't treat the beta builds different since this is what will land in the archive after the beta cycle has finished
[15:23] <ricotz> if those features are tested upstream and enabled by default it should be be avaible already or will be when upstream decides to
[15:28] <ricotz> _amano, I guess you didnt get any of my messages
[15:47] <seb128> tkamppeter, hey, could you have a look to https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/request-autoconnection-of-cups-control-for-libreoffice/2517 and reply to the pending questions there?
[15:55] <mgedmin> I'm not getting any notifications about available security updates in ubuntu gnome 17.10, why is that?
[15:56] <mgedmin> sometimes I get a gnome-software notification about updates, but when I click I get a screen saying everything's up to date
[15:56] <mgedmin> hitting Refresh sometimes shows me flatpak platform runtime updates, nothing else
[15:57] <mgedmin> (sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get upgrade -d in a terminal shows me there are available security updates for e.g. webkit)
[15:59] <Laney> Software doesn't tell you about deb package updates, that's the job of Sofware Updater
[16:00] <Laney> and that's supposed to notify daily if there are security updates iirc
[16:00] <mgedmin> is that the new name of update-manager?  I've got it installed, but never saw any notifications
[16:03] <mgedmin> oh, I see I set it to download and install security updates automatically at some point
[16:03] <mgedmin> maybe it actually does?  strange that I never noticed
[16:06] <Laney> ISTR that maybe unattended-upgrades is installed by default now
[16:16] <tkamppeter> seb128, I have answered there.
[16:29] <seb128> tkamppeter, thanks
[17:02] <Trevinho> hi guys
[17:02] <Trevinho> anyone can publish this for me https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3039 ?
[17:03]  * Trevinho survived to the upgrade to Firefox Quantum.... Enhoying the new speed with less extensions :)
[17:14] <seb128> hey Trevinho
[17:15] <Trevinho> hi seb128, allright?
[17:15] <seb128> yes!
[17:15] <seb128> you?
[17:26] <seb128> andyrock, you said you would update the SRU description according to Brian's comment on bug #1703046?
[17:27] <seb128> Trevinho, I published your silo
[17:29] <Trevinho> seb128: thanks...
[17:29] <seb128> yw!
[17:29] <Trevinho> seb128: and yes.. I'm good..
[18:45] <B01> Hi
[18:46] <B01> i am using GNOME and could not reduce the SIZE of my Desktop Icons.
[18:47] <B01> i have many file and folders on my Desktop and ICON Size is very Huge.
[18:47] <B01> I've tried many ways and could not reduce the ICON Size.
[18:48] <B01> Could someone help / point out on what i am missing here ?
[18:55] <Trevinho> Laney: hey, what are you using now with quantum instead of vimfx or other similar extensions?
[18:56] <Trevinho> I've been using saka-key so far, but there are some missing things (due to the webext arch I guess)
[19:36] <andyrock> seb128: didn't I?
[19:37] <andyrock> ah
[19:37] <andyrock> i forgot the errors.ubuntu.com link
[19:42] <andyrock> done
[19:42] <andyrock> sorry about that
[19:52] <gQuigs> B01: I also think I have that issue randomly.. right now the icons are huge on the desktop - last boot I swear they weren't
[19:53] <gQuigs> I haven't had time to debug it at all though
[19:53] <seb128> andyrock, np, thanks
[19:54] <gQuigs> B01: open up Files/Nautilus and do Ctrl and "-" to reduce both sizes...
[20:59] <B01> @gQuigs, it is on my Desktop
[20:59] <B01> where there are many files.
[21:00] <B01> not in other directories.
[21:03] <gQuigs> hmm, for me it shows the consistent size from Files/Nautilus (guess I could have accidentally Ctrl and + in a directory)
[21:11] <jbicha> the icon size is supposed to be global now; there is no per-directory icon size option any more
[21:14] <B01> @jbicha, i would like to reduce the size of all the objects / icons on my desktop.
[21:14] <B01> i could not do that somehow.
[21:24] <jbicha> B01: open the Files app, open the ☰  menu, click the - icon. The lowest it goes is 50%