[00:19] axw: thanks for that controller login branch, I'm sure it'll help some 2.2.4 controllers going to 2.3 [00:53] thumper: np [00:53] thumper: I think it's a little tidier now anyway, but I'm biased [01:08] * babbageclunk steps out to look at a house [01:20] jam: I think I'm going to have to back out the change to stop running a pinger for other controllers [01:20] jam: it seems there's no guarantee that the controller workers will connect to their own apiserver. that seems wrong, but I don't know that I can fix it in time for 2.3 [01:21] jam: post 2.3, each controller machine can just run a pinger for itself in its dependency engine [01:40] thumper: can you please review https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8122? [01:43] axw: sure [01:48] axw: we should talk about this change, because I don't think it is right [01:48] thumper: it's reverting a change to how it was, but ok [01:48] oh... [01:49] right you are [01:49] this is fine [01:49] thumper: you wanna HO? [01:49] although, just 5m to confirm [01:49] lets 1:1 HO [01:49] sure [02:41] thumper: are we going to have something that's going to collect and amalgamate audit logs from different controller machines? [04:19] babbageclunk: um... [04:19] ? [04:19] we aren't looking at writing a tool at this stage [04:19] they are aware that an amalgamated view would be needed [04:20] thumper: just occurred to me as I was ripping out the DB storage pieces. [04:20] * thumper nods [04:55] thumper: since this is a stream of either calls or facade methods, it should probably include a type indicator on each record. Maybe just have a top-level item struct with an omitempty field for each of the two records? === frankban|afk is now known as frankban === mup_ is now known as mup === frankban is now known as frankban|afk [20:20] thumper: I remember you saying something about introspecting the types of API results to find errors - what was that about? [21:32] babbageclunk: otp right now [21:32] with you after [21:39] tsk you're always on the phone [21:40] that's what managers do [21:41] :( [23:41] veebers: can https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7715 be closed? [23:45] veebers: and is https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7858 still something you intend to land? [23:49] * veebers looks [23:50] axw: ah right, ci-run is work in progress I need to get back to it and land it, same with the 2nd, I can bring down the PR for that one if it's distracting as there is a little more work needed there (was put up as a PR for the discussion) [23:50] veebers: no worries, just checking [23:50] sometimes PRs just hang around forever [23:51] axw: axk, thanks for the heads up; I do need to move them forward