| doko | mitya57: do you know the origin of this python -> python3 suggestion? | 05:39 |
|---|---|---|
| decci | Hello | 06:05 |
| decci | While installing openwsman 2.4.x it points to old openssl 1.1.0 package while I need it to use openssl 1.1.0 which is already installed on my system | 06:06 |
| decci | Any idea how shall I apply patch https://github.com/Openwsman/openwsman/issues/98 | 07:19 |
| mitya57 | doko, no :( | 10:43 |
| cpaelzer | is the auto-upgrading of dpkg owned conffiled done in some call in #DEBHELPER# or otherwise before/after? | 12:52 |
| cpaelzer | I know much is in dpkg-mainstcript-helper - I'm interested in the basic (if you have nothing in maintscripts) three way check: if "oldmd5 == storedmd5" then place new conf from pkg | 12:57 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| f_g | cpaelzer: AFAIK dpkg handles that itself when configuring a package, but you might want to wait for someone with more knowledge to confirm (or check dpkg's source yourself) | 13:02 |
| cpaelzer | I almost assumed it does so by itself, in that case it would be important where in the post/pre calling that comes | 13:02 |
| cpaelzer | but if it is dpkg itself then it might be in the flowchart on the debian wiki | 13:02 |
| cpaelzer | thanks f_g | 13:02 |
| cpaelzer | not that I'd see it clearly on https://wiki.debian.org/MaintainerScripts | 13:04 |
| f_g | cpaelzer: seems like it's before the call to postinst configure | 13:06 |
| cpaelzer | f_g: where did you see that? | 13:07 |
| f_g | https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/tree/src/configure.c#n678 | 13:07 |
| f_g | :P | 13:07 |
| cpaelzer | well that is documentation enough, thanks f_g | 13:08 |
| f_g | np - was curious myself ;) | 13:08 |
| cjwatson | cpaelzer: It's also in policy. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-configuration | 13:23 |
| cpaelzer | yeah, thanks cjwatson | 13:24 |
| === freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === crogers_ is now known as crogers | ||
| === crogers_ is now known as crogers | ||
| AsciiWolf | hi, does anyone have any info about the issue with Ubuntu Software (GNOME Software) not removing dependencies when uninstalling a package (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1552792)? is there any chance that this bug will be (finally) fixed in 18.04? | 18:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1552792 in gnome-software (Ubuntu) "gnome software leaves dependencies installed" [Medium,Triaged] | 18:36 |
| jbicha | AsciiWolf: I don't think any one is working on that issue. You can file a bug upstream for it if you like | 18:37 |
| AsciiWolf | jbicha, so it is an upstream (packagekit?) issue? | 18:39 |
| jbicha | uh, maybe gnome-software? | 18:40 |
| AsciiWolf | I am not having this issue when using GNOME Software on Fedora | 18:41 |
| AsciiWolf | so I think it's rather a PackageKit apt backend issue | 18:42 |
| AsciiWolf | Ubuntu is using PackageKit (not aptdaemon) as GNOME Software backend, right? | 18:43 |
| jbicha | yes as of 17.10 | 18:43 |
| AsciiWolf | ok... this issue is there since the switch to gnome software in 16.04 so maybe it's really a GNOME Software issue | 18:46 |
| AsciiWolf | I'll report it upstream, hope it will get fixed, it's really bad and confusing bug for regular users, especially in combination with this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1528028 | 18:48 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1528028 in GNOME Software "gnome-software does not report installing a desktop environment as a dependency" [Medium,In progress] | 18:48 |
| jbicha | AsciiWolf: Fedora 27's GNOME Software does not autoremove dependencies for no-longer-installed apps either | 18:54 |
| AsciiWolf | jbicha, that's weird, I have tried it before and it worked | 18:55 |
| AsciiWolf | I will try it again and let you know | 18:55 |
| jbicha | I just tried it by installing gnome-tweak-tool, gnome-shell-extension-user-theme is still installed | 18:56 |
| AsciiWolf | oops, looks like you are right! | 19:04 |
| AsciiWolf | jbicha, I have reported the issue upstream, thanks! | 19:52 |
| juliank | jbicha: I'd fully expect someone to work on this eventually, given the push for autoremoving stuff automatically in apt, and given that g-s is used by users even less aware of autoremove, it seems even more important to me. | 20:53 |
| Unit193 | tjaalton: Hello! I'm presuming the offhand remark about SRU'ing -ati wasn't really an offer or anything; however, if you did, I'd be willing to test (as I grabbed the package and added that patch, as well as several of the memleak/etc bug fixes too.) | 20:55 |
| juliank | I'm not entirely sure why there is such a huge interest in these things _now_, but then I don't really care about such details :) | 20:55 |
| Unit193 | Hmm...Due to the upcoming LTS perhaps? | 20:55 |
| juliank | I mean, I'd do that directly _after_ the LTS, but not _in_ the LTS cycle :D | 20:56 |
| juliank | Like, we could have worked on that 2 years ago | 20:57 |
| Unit193 | Hmm...Wasn't I going to try and bug you about another apt thing? | 20:57 |
| juliank | Maybe | 20:57 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: i have 2 neutron uploads to the artful queue. would you be able to delete the oldest one (about 10 minutes old now)? | 21:04 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: done | 21:06 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: thanks | 21:06 |
| TJ- | Could someone consider bug #1735014 | 22:53 |
| ubottu | bug 1735014 in debootstrap (Ubuntu) "file:// and ssh:// protocols do not allow for failed gets" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1735014 | 22:53 |
| rbasak | TJ-: looks like this is unrelated to the Ubuntu delta so should be sent up to Debian? | 23:21 |
| TJ- | rbasak: thanks; I'll do that | 23:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!