[21:32] <TarsOn> Can`t get a correct download link from tha QA Tracker
[21:32] <wxl> explain
[21:32] <TarsOn> mean package testing
[21:34] <TarsOn> no link shown after click Zesty or Yakkety Daily
[21:34] <wxl> i found a PlusOne wiki page that says dch -R, dch -r, dpkg-buildpackage -S
[21:34] <wxl> oops wrong channel
[21:34] <wxl> what page are you on?
[21:34] <wxl> cd /ts
[21:34] <wxl> i found a PlusOne wiki page that says dch -R, dch -r, dpkg-buildpackage -S
[21:34] <TarsOn> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/361/builds/117788/downloads
[21:35] <wxl> oh heh
[21:35] <wxl> i didn't realize you said daily
[21:35] <wxl> they're not in testing
[21:35] <wxl> also wait
[21:35] <wxl> are you supposed to be on the package tracker?
[21:36] <wxl> cuzzzzzzzzzz i'm not even sure anyone uses that tbh
[21:36] <TarsOn> I just don`t know ...what to start on
[21:36] <wxl> iso.qa.ubuntu.com
[21:36] <wxl> go run some tests on bionic daily
[21:37] <TarsOn> wanted to do smth useful)
[21:37] <TarsOn> ok, thx
[21:37] <wxl> ^^ that would be useful. then report bugs.
[21:41] <flocculant> package tracker gets used if someone wants to :)
[21:43] <flocculant> wxl: while you're about - did you think more about the iso stuffs?
[21:43] <flocculant> to be honest - not sure which iso tests you think are just lubuntu
[21:44] <wxl> flocculant: yeah, actually, but i stepped back a bit. i think the bug i'm going to propose is how we deal with needing to test both UEFI and non-UEFI boots
[21:44] <flocculant> ok - that's a different kettle of fish :p
[21:45] <wxl> yeah
[21:45] <wxl> i mean UEFI problems were why i wanted to make some changes so i kept asking questions until i had backed myself off enough :)
[21:45] <flocculant> biggest problem in my opinion is getting people out 'there' to test things more
[21:47] <wxl> i know
[21:47] <flocculant> ha
[21:47] <wxl> that's the thing i was really struggling with
[21:47] <wxl> because in order to have proper coverage, we nede to double our workload as far as testcases are concerned
[21:47] <flocculant> that has was to your backing yourself out btw
[21:47] <flocculant> wxl: how so?
[21:48] <wxl> well i guess we'll deal wit hthis in the bug but if we have testcase 1, 2, and 3, to ensure they all behave well with both UEFI and legacy booting, we need to have 2 sets of them
[21:49] <flocculant> mmm maybe - how much difference is there?
[21:49] <wxl> does anyone actually know? :)
[21:49]  * flocculant has pc that could obviously do uefi if he wanted - but it's all turned off
[21:49] <flocculant> I don't - never installed with uefi
[21:50] <wxl> well more and more people are expecting it
[21:50] <flocculant> then people who expect it, should put up then
[21:50] <wxl> XD
[21:51] <flocculant> which is down to community communication - so I'll leave it with you :D
[21:51] <flocculant> best I could do (afaik) is kvm emulation
[21:51] <wxl> yeah vbox does it too
[21:51] <flocculant> right
[21:53] <flocculant> mmm ... think I'm missing a package
[21:55] <flocculant> lol - qemu efi ... 1842kB will be downloaded ... 136MB of extra space will be used
[21:57] <flocculant> will try again tomorrow - got an error doing that uefi/qemu thing, likely something needs restarting - but I've been up for 18 hours now so time for bed :)
[21:58] <flocculant> wxl - anyway we can talk again about this if you want - some other time :)