| tsimonq2 | Can I please get Binary NEW queue reviews for marble and akonadi? There's a sort of large tree that's depwait because of those... | 02:23 |
|---|---|---|
| tsimonq2 | Also, if a package is demoted to -proposed, what criteria does it have to meet to get back in -release? | 02:39 |
| tsimonq2 | (Adam demoted libkf5kface to -proposed during the opencv stuff, there's a new upstream release that should fix things) | 02:40 |
| tsimonq2 | (At least I thought, but it's irrelevant to the question about criteria, which I'd like to know for future reference ;) 0 | 02:44 |
| tsimonq2 | s/0/)/ | 02:44 |
| tsimonq2 | Can kubrick be let through? arm* is intentionally no longer built because of this gem: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386367 | 03:08 |
| ubot5 | KDE bug 386367 in general "Support open GL ES" [Wishlist,Unconfirmed] | 03:08 |
| tsimonq2 | (by "let through" I mean "do the thing so Britney doesn't complain about missing those ;)") | 03:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: childsplay (trusty-proposed/universe) [1.6-1 => 1.6-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 04:17 | |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: most tests I queue are by clicking the 'retry' buttons on the proposed-migration / autopkgtest pages | 04:57 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: a package demoted to -proposed gets back into devel the same way any other package migrates from -proposed to devel | 04:58 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: and removing kubrick/arm64 would appear to make kdegames newly uninstallable on that architecture (arch: all package with dep on kubrick). are you sure that's what you want here? | 05:00 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: demotion remigration> Does it need *all* arches to pass builds or just the arches it previously built on> | 05:03 |
| slangasek | the latter | 05:03 |
| tsimonq2 | Ok, cool. | 05:03 |
| slangasek | specifically, the rule is that there must not be any out of date binaries for any arch | 05:04 |
| tsimonq2 | Well how does it know if there's out-of-date binaries if it's removed from -release and all -proposed arches are FTBFS? | 05:04 |
| slangasek | by definition if there are no binaries there are no out of date binaries | 05:04 |
| slangasek | however, if there was an older version of the package in -proposed that did build on some archs, and those binaries are published, but the package no longer builds on those archs, those are out-of-date binaries | 05:05 |
| tsimonq2 | But then why would it be removed from -proposed in the first place? | 05:06 |
| tsimonq2 | s/proposed/release/ | 05:06 |
| slangasek | for whatever reason the AA gave when removing it | 05:06 |
| slangasek | (which is logged in LP) | 05:06 |
| tsimonq2 | Fair. :P | 05:06 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: kubrick> Would something like this be correct in the Depends field of kdegames? (Debian policy doesn't seem to help on this): kubrick [!arm64] (>= ${kde:Version}), | 05:11 |
| slangasek | not unless you change the package to be arch: any instead of arch: all. | 05:11 |
| tsimonq2 | Why is that the case? | 05:12 |
| slangasek | [] notation is evaluated at package build time. | 05:12 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh, gotcha. | 05:12 |
| tsimonq2 | (And it seems sane in this case to change to any) | 05:13 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-kde/5:92ubuntu4 | 05:16 |
| tsimonq2 | So yes, I'm OK with that now. | 05:16 |
| slangasek | ok | 05:16 |
| slangasek | removed | 05:16 |
| tsimonq2 | Thanks. | 05:17 |
| slangasek | why was it dropped on arm64, though? I don't know how to interpret 'KDE Bug:386367' from the changelog; and it never failed to build in Ubuntu | 05:17 |
| tsimonq2 | "Kubrick needs openGL which means it can't be built on platforms which use openGLES. Arm platforms typically use GLES. Ideally it should be posted to also build with GLES." | 05:18 |
| slangasek | curious; that doesn't seem like the sort of thing that would've been a new requirement in kubrick | 05:19 |
| tsimonq2 | Well we did do a new upstream release. | 05:20 |
| tsimonq2 | (well, they did, you get the point) | 05:20 |
| slangasek | ah, the difference is the previous version was building against qt4 | 05:23 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh, right, that would explain it. | 05:23 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: So then out of curiosity, why did that not have to go through Binary NEW? | 05:28 |
| slangasek | which? | 05:29 |
| tsimonq2 | (given that there were new binaries specifically for each arch instead of just one arch:all binary) | 05:29 |
| tsimonq2 | kdegames | 05:29 |
| slangasek | hmm because the binary was already known for each arch | 05:29 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh, I thought it'd have to go through Binary NEW. TIL. | 05:30 |
| * tsimonq2 goes to bed, thanks slangasek! | 05:39 | |
| * slangasek waves | 05:39 | |
| acheronuk | yes, we did test build kubrick and found the FTBFS doing that. thanks for the above | 07:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slic3r (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.9+dfsg-6.1 => 1.2.9+dfsg-6.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:59 | |
| hyperair | damnit, tagged the wrong bug | 13:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slic3r (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.9+dfsg-6.1 => 1.2.9+dfsg-6.1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 13:03 | |
| hyperair | ^ please ignore 1.2.9+dfsg-6.1ubuntu1 (wrong bug in changelog) | 13:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected slic3r [source] (artful-proposed) [1.2.9+dfsg-6.1ubuntu1] | 13:17 | |
| jbicha | slangasek: good morning, several recent amd64/i386 autopkgtests fail with "ERROR: testbed failure: unexpected eof from the testbed" | 16:50 |
| tsimonq2 | I can +1 that, I've seen a couple ones myself failing like that. | 16:52 |
| jbicha | slangasek: more specific example: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/grass/bionic/amd64 | 16:52 |
| tsimonq2 | It would certainly help if there weren't literally two amd64/i386 builders not stalled >_< https://launchpad.net/builders/ | 16:54 |
| tsimonq2 | s/2/3/ but still | 16:54 |
| tsimonq2 | Seems like they've been like that for about 13 hours... | 16:57 |
| === elmo_ is now known as elmo | ||
| slangasek | jbicha: looking at it I see some neutron errors in one of the x86 cloud regions; I'll escalate | 18:42 |
| slangasek | meanwhile, I guess the good news is the arm64 backlog is finally less than the x86 backlog :P | 18:43 |
| slangasek | (also, armhf is now the second fastest autopkgtest arch, how do you like that) | 18:44 |
| === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
| tsimonq2 | If anyone's around, Launchpad's down to 2 active builders for amd64 and i386. | 20:30 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh, seems to be good now. \o/ | 21:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mame [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.192+dfsg.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 22:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: msxpertsuite [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.8.1-2] (no packageset) | 23:34 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!