[17:00] <blackboxsw> smoser: rharper I'm no longer op in this channel. can either of you change topic to Next status meeting Monday: 12/11
[17:01] <rharper> blackboxsw:  /topic all yours
[17:02] <blackboxsw> teach a man to fish ....
[17:02] <blackboxsw> tjx
[17:02] <blackboxsw> thx
[17:20] <smoser> someoow i can make it auto-op you. let me find
[18:23] <blkadder> Hi all. Having problems partitioning a device: https://paste.ubuntu.com/26113667/ Wondering if it is me or an actual bug…
[18:24] <blkadder> Do I need to explicitly wipefs the device beforehand perhaps?
[18:25] <smoser> blkadder: well, ideally you would not need to.
[18:25] <blkadder> That’s what I would hope. :-)
[18:25] <smoser> i'd consider it a bug in cloud-init, but yeah. thats what the issue is.
[18:25] <smoser> maybe there is some way to say that ... let me check
[18:25] <blkadder> Gracias.
[18:28] <smoser> what is yit looks like if you can live with a gpt it might work
[18:28] <smoser> table_type: <'mbr'/'gpt'>
[18:28] <blkadder> k
[18:29] <blkadder> I’m trying to move /var so hope so.
[18:29] <smoser> go ahead and file a bug though please
[18:29] <smoser> ubuntu-bug cloud-init
[18:29] <blkadder> Will do, thanks.
[18:29] <smoser> will do it
[18:39] <blkadder> Done.
[18:47] <blkadder> gpt works, thanks.
[20:24] <ybaumy> hi
[20:24] <ybaumy> can somebody help me find an error in a cloud-init python config script? http://paste.ubuntu.com/26114214/ the error is at the bottom
[20:25]  * rharper takes a peek
[20:25] <ybaumy> for there were the default path variables wrong on centos
[20:25] <ybaumy> s/for/first
[20:25] <ybaumy> i changed those
[20:25] <ybaumy> and then this error comes up
[20:26] <rharper> I wonder if there's something up with the python2.7 puppet in centos then ?
[20:26] <rharper> 6? 7 ?
[20:26] <ybaumy> its 7 the latest patches
[20:27] <ybaumy> i already wrote a post to the mailling list but no one replied yet. and i need that puppet working
[20:27] <Wulf> with six.StringIO() as outputstream...
[20:27] <Wulf> perhaps something wrong with six?
[20:27] <blackboxsw> there was a BytesIO instead of stringIO
[20:27] <blackboxsw> I think I already submitted a patch for that
[20:27] <rharper> google is telling me python2.7 and with and StringIO may be problematic
[20:27]  * blackboxsw lookgs
[20:27] <blackboxsw> f831a874021f3d6d24cbe5639a176f416b5436a6 in master
[20:28] <rharper> blackboxsw: ah, fixed upstream but maybe not yet in centos's cloud-init
[20:28] <blackboxsw> not sure if that's in the centos version that is being run agains
[20:28] <rharper> there are some fedora/rhel folks in here
[20:28] <rharper> ybaumy: you may need to file a centos/rhel issue to get the upstream commit merged into the distro cloud-init
[20:29] <ybaumy> i had trouble with django issues with katello/foreman and i installed the latest django version. would something like that be possible to fix this?
[20:29] <ybaumy> i installed that with pip
[20:30] <ybaumy> rharper: that will take forever i guess
[20:30] <blackboxsw> yeah given the comment on line 77 of the pastebin, my patch for BytesIO isn't in that version
[20:30] <rharper> yeah, I dunno what the general frequency of updates
[20:30] <Wulf> I had a look at debian/sid, and python2 doesn't like with six.StringIO() either.
[20:31] <ybaumy> ok then i will write an update to my mail to the mailling list
[20:31] <blackboxsw> hrm, we have a copr daily build of master at  https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/cloud-init/cloud-init-dev/ that might help in this case. :/ at least it'd have the cloud-init fix
[20:33] <ybaumy> ah it might be in epel already
[20:33] <ybaumy> let me check that
[20:34] <ybaumy> hmm no not in the official
[20:42] <ybaumy> yea
[20:42] <ybaumy> :D
[20:42] <ybaumy> works
[20:42] <ybaumy> you still have to change pathes in py and compile to pyc
[20:44] <ybaumy> thanks guys
[20:48] <blackboxsw> good to hear
[20:48] <blackboxsw> at least we don't have an upstream bug to work ;)
[20:50] <rharper> ybaumy: what's the path changes ?
[20:50] <rharper> that sounds like possible upstream bug or is this related to your pip ?
[20:50] <ybaumy> ok last question before i quit for today. the certname is nocloud.kent-hanchett.1000.local but my hostname is kent-hanchett.1000.local. why is that? i added certname: "%i.%f" to the cloud-init config
[20:51] <ybaumy> rharper: i dont think so. on the client i havent updates django yet only on the server
[20:58] <ybaumy> i removed the %f
[20:58] <ybaumy> i mean i
[20:58] <ybaumy> now the hostname is correct
[21:02] <dojordan> @blackboxsw I've addressed your comments, when you get a chance can you look again? https://code.launchpad.net/~dojordan/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init/+merge/334341
[21:06] <blackboxsw> dojordan: thanks, will do today. trying to unstick myself at the moment ;)
[21:29] <ybaumy> rharper: path changes to /etc/puppetlabs/puppet and the /var/lib/puppet/ssl to /etc/puppetlabs/puppet/ssl
[21:29] <ybaumy> rharper: this is the client from the official repo
[21:29] <rharper> ybaumy: does that match what distro clients use?
[21:30] <ybaumy> rharper: i dont know... the official katello install docu says i should use this client. so i did
[21:30] <rharper> I think it could make sense to support both ;
[21:30] <ybaumy> rharper: think so too.
[21:31] <rharper> ybaumy: can you file a bug ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+filebug and attach your changes to the path ? we can pick that up from there
[21:31] <ybaumy> or make the path configurable
[21:31] <ybaumy> in the cloud-init.cfg
[21:32] <rharper> yeah
[21:32] <ybaumy> rharper: will open a bug
[21:32] <rharper> thanks
[21:32] <ybaumy> np
[21:33] <blackboxsw> does puppet.cfg announce that configuration path difference?
[21:33]  * blackboxsw wonders if we can inspect that config change from puppet itself (either through cmdline or config file)
[21:35] <ybaumy> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1736261 hope thats enough
[21:36] <ybaumy> im off for today. thanks for your fast help guys. really brought me forward
[21:38] <rharper> ybaumy: thanks again for the bug
[22:40] <smoser> blackboxsw: http://paste.ubuntu.com/26114924/
[22:40] <smoser> that seems to function for laujnch-softlayer
[22:40] <smoser> lots of improvements still to do, but generally gets near there. and makes me more familiar with  launch-ec2 also
[22:44] <blackboxsw> smoser: good deal, I was just pushing up changes to launch-ec2 for specific vpc/subnet/route_table fixes
[22:44] <blackboxsw> checking it out
[22:45] <blackboxsw> just pushed to qa-scripts everything I have ( just finished testing --proposed ec2 for the dhcpclient  sanbox fixes)
[22:45] <blackboxsw> smoser: can you push a launch-softlayer to qa-scripts too. we can consolidate on next iteration
[23:06] <smoser> blackboxsw: i'll push tomorrow