/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/12/06/#ubuntu-release.txt

acheronuktsimonq2: looks like maybe now britney has wrongly tried against most over a few releases, and there are none left running and not ignored. however, this was discussed we me and slangasek and I think Laney on here before, who both said britney should be triggering00:02
tsimonq2ok00:02
acheronuktsimonq2: I'm too tired to grep logs, but the discussions are somewhere in those for this channel00:03
acheronuk*both said britney should NOT be triggering00:04
acheronuktsimonq2: 2017-07-01:[20:01] <slangasek> acheronuk: hint added; however, it is unclear to me why this kdepim-addons/s390x test was triggered, given that kdepim-addons produces no binaries on s390x, so that's probably a bug.  (I did have a hint for kdepim-addons/s390x in place already, and then I dropped it once things migrated00:17
acheronuktsimonq2: shoudl not have looked so hard. kdepim-addons is an example. LOL00:17
tsimonq2acheronuk: hah00:18
acheronuktsimonq2: spuriously triggers on those on itsekf: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kdepim-addons00:19
acheronukbut NOT on most other packages it triggers against00:19
acheronukas said, some britney oddness00:19
* acheronuk is tired as his typing is going haywire00:20
acheronukmore haywire than usual, anyway00:20
slangasektsimonq2: upload to cherry-pick those test fixes is definitely preferred, please00:42
tsimonq2slangasek: Alright.00:42
slangasekif you told me that having to fix it was going to set back the migration by days and risk entangling with other transitions, I might make an exception; but all other things being equal it's always better to keep a green baseline00:43
acheronuktsimonq2: go for it then00:44
tsimonq2Ok00:45
acheronuktsimonq2 is going for kubuntu-dev, so needs the practice :P00:45
* acheronuk hides00:45
RAOFbdmurray: Are you doing a late shift? :)00:51
tsimonq2RAOF: Hey! Around at all to talk about the Lubuntu SRUs?01:00
RAOFtsimonq2: Yes!01:00
tsimonq2RAOF: So what happened here is that I thought that the latest lubuntu-meta was accepted adding a dep on pavucontrol *before* everything was published01:02
tsimonq2RAOF: Turns out it wasn't01:02
tsimonq2RAOF: I thought I hadn't made the upload at all, so I made another upload01:02
tsimonq2RAOF: But the upload with the new bug number got rejected in favor for this one that was never accepted01:02
tsimonq2RAOF: tl;dr some way or another we need a new lubuntu-meta in -updates adding pulseaudio because at this point it's regression-update tagged01:03
tsimonq2s/pulseaudio/pavucontrol/01:04
RAOFIt would have been clearer to file a second bug for the update regression. :)01:05
RAOFBut, now that we're here…01:05
tsimonq2There *was* one01:05
tsimonq2That upload got rejected in favor of this one01:05
tsimonq2https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/168559801:06
ubot5Launchpad bug 1685598 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Xenial) "Clicking 'Sound Settings' in Lubuntu is a no-op " [Critical,In progress]01:06
RAOFUrgh.01:06
tsimonq2My thought exactly.01:06
RAOF(With a side order of: why didn't the acceptance of 0.65.3 get noted on the bug?)01:06
tsimonq2This has been a bug caused by Firefox completely removing ALSA support that's been a thing since *August*. Please oh please can we just get this over with already? :)01:07
RAOFOk, so: has 0.65.3 been tested? It's been accepted into -proposed.01:07
tsimonq2Yes.01:07
tsimonq2It's been tested.01:07
tsimonq2I tested it on a fresh install as soon as it was accepted.01:07
RAOFSold! To the man in the silly hat.01:08
tsimonq2Thanks a bunch!01:08
RAOFIn general, feel free to ping me on my SRU day 😸01:09
tsimonq2Alright, thanks.01:11
tsimonq2RAOF: Could I get that childsplay SRU processed please?01:15
tsimonq2(I plan on using as future reference for new packagers, that's why this 3 year old bug finally gets a patch :P)01:15
* RAOF looks01:19
wxlsomething's funky with d-i it seems? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/173630901:27
ubot5Launchpad bug 1736309 in debootstrap (Ubuntu) "installer failed missing dpkg_1.19.0.4ubuntu1_amd64.deb" [Undecided,New]01:27
RAOFAn SRU to trusty ?!01:34
tsimonq2RAOF: Yes. :P01:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted childsplay [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.6-1ubuntu0.1]01:36
tsimonq2RAOF: Thanks.01:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)02:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)03:18
* tsimonq2 gets a bit retry-happy now that kdepim-addons is uploaded04:02
tsimonq2All done pressing the retry button. :P04:05
tsimonq2Hopefully things migrate now.04:05
slangasekdoko: so, libcdio; API-breaking, about half of the revdeps ftbfs?04:44
dokoslangasek: looking at that today ...06:41
slangasekdoko: ok. I've just uploaded vcdimager, which may also fix xine-lib-1.2 and vlc06:57
acheronuktsimonq2: did you have a chance to try those PIM test fixes?07:02
acheronukslangasek: can kdepim-addons (add ppc64el to existing hint), akonadi-calendar, and libkf5eventviews be ignored on ppc64el/s390x as mentioned earlier in the miidle of me and tsimonq2 talking?07:13
acheronukor apw if you are about this early ^^^07:14
slangasekacheronuk: I don't see an existing hint for kdepim-addons, and kdepim-addons/ppc64el is "always-failed" so doesn't need a hint.  Did you mean kdepim-addons/s390x, or something else?07:15
acheronukslangasek: yes, I meant add s390x. sorry. got it the wrong way around07:17
slangasekacheronuk: added07:19
acheronukappreciated. thanks07:19
acheronukslangasek: damn kdepim-runtime/4:17.08.3-0ubuntu1 is the same and needs one as well. sorry. did you or anyone ever work out why these are being triggered initially when there are no binaries?07:21
acheronukor just kdepim-runtime generally for ppc64el/s390, as looks like tsimonq2 has not uploaded the fix for the other architectures yet :/07:23
acheronukI really wish KDE would stop coding stuff to require QtWebEngine. Grr.07:26
* doko discards his vcdimager changes ...07:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dipy [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dipy [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dipy [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)07:42
dokodid something change with openGL on arm64 recently?07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dipy [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)07:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dipy [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)08:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)08:21
dokochrisccoulson: not accepting rustc, ftbfs on i38608:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dipy [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)08:23
LocutusOfBorgdoko, yes, e.g. qtbase and gl stuff changed IIRC08:28
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, ^^^08:28
LocutusOfBorgbut I don't remember how :)08:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-19.22~16.04.1]08:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-103.126]08:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-42.46~16.04.1]08:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.13.0-19.22]08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-137.186]08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-103.126~14.04.1]08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-42.46]08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dipy [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.0-2]08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dipy [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.0-2]08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dipy [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.0-2]08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dipy [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.0-2]08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dipy [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.0-2]08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dipy [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.0-2]08:40
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: you were on the last merge of curl - I think I'd poke on the next one as I need it for some work on nghttp2 anyway09:01
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: I added myself in mom, is it ok if I grab that one?09:01
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: also any known-hurdles from your last merge?09:01
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, please steal, but please make it migrate before merging09:29
LocutusOfBorgbecause of $security updates09:30
LocutusOfBorgthis is why I didn't merge it yet09:30
cpaelzerhmm - checking where it doesn't migrate ...09:33
cpaelzerhmm - I love earning extra tasks :-)09:37
cpaelzerwill take a look - thanks for the info LocutusOfBorg09:37
cpaelzerI can concurrently test the new thing from ppas09:38
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: would you be willing to review the merge once done - should be a trivial one as it looks right now ?09:38
cpaelzermdeslaur: if you have further info why this might fail to migrate let us know09:40
cpaelzermdeslaur: all CVEs would be included in the latest merge09:40
* cjwatson fixes ubuntu.bionic/STRUCTURE in response to several overnight image build failures09:46
chrisccoulsondoko, a rebuild will probably "fix" that. There's an issue where rustc crashes randomly on the builders but not locally10:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.24 => 2.408.25] (desktop-core)11:01
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: I got to look at curl since I'm about to pull nghttp2 into main11:10
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: but I saw that the new merge would bump libcurl-gnutls 4.4 -> 4.5 - I'd not want to fuse that with the nghttp2 enablement11:11
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: so I will try to get the current one to migrate and then for now just do the enablement11:11
cpaelzerleaving the actual merge open for now11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-dock-plug-ins [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-dock-plug-ins [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)11:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-dock-plug-ins [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)11:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-dock-plug-ins [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)11:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-dock-plug-ins [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1010.11] (kernel)11:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-dock-plug-ins [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)11:53
mdeslaurcpaelzer, LocutusOfBorg: looks like an unrelated test failure in casync12:07
mdeslaurcpaelzer, LocutusOfBorg: it can get manually promoted I guess12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-dock-plug-ins [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-dock-plug-ins [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-dock-plug-ins [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-dock-plug-ins [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-dock-plug-ins [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-dock-plug-ins [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1010.11]12:09
cpaelzermdeslaur: I came to the same conclusion12:23
cpaelzermdeslaur: test history also looks that way failing/not-failing for no apparent reason12:23
cpaelzerI wanted to run on a s390x system manually to be sure before asking to promote thou12:23
cpaelzerwhich is WIP atm12:24
mdeslaurcpaelzer: I didn't ask to get it migrated because last time I looked there were still running tests12:24
cpaelzermdeslaur: I fixed the last remaining regression12:24
cpaelzermdeslaur: just hours ago12:24
mdeslaurcool12:24
cpaelzernow only casync is left12:24
cpaelzeronce I'm confident engouh (by manual test) I'll ask for the promotion12:24
cpaelzerthe other one was a flaky network-manager test12:25
mdeslaurcan someone migrate samba too? the remaining test is unrelated also.12:26
cpaelzerso no big magic involved in fixing that12:26
cpaelzermdeslaur: the remaining samba fail looks like no ipv4 was available12:27
cpaelzermdeslaur: do our testbeds have (sometimes) only ipv6 recently?12:27
mdeslaurI don't know, I don't think so12:29
cpaelzerbut I agree - the history of it looks like the issue you face was thre before the samba change http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/gvfs/bionic/ppc64el12:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pythonqt [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.0-1ubuntu1.16.04.2]12:37
cpaelzerok casync really works well outside the testbed on LP - http://paste.ubuntu.com/26124829/12:38
cpaelzerTherby I'd ask the release team to promote curl curl/7.55.1-1ubuntu3 in bionic-proposed12:38
cpaelzerI also see history on this test is on most arches already ignored failure12:40
cpaelzerI'd almost assume this got a blocker now that s390x uses VMs12:40
cpaelzerok it really is marked as that, just not on s390x yet12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lime-forensics [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.7.2-1ubuntu1]12:42
cpaelzerso might I ask to add s390x to the list that is currently masked at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/view/head:/vorlon#L8912:42
cpaelzerslangasek: infinity: apw: ^^ ?12:42
apwcpaelzer, what is the reasoning behind that12:43
LocutusOfBorgapw, I retried against the release version, regressed in release12:44
LocutusOfBorgprobably due to the lxc changes in s390x containers12:44
cpaelzerexactly12:44
cpaelzerslangasek: already masked it for those reasons on all other arches that woudl run it before12:45
cpaelzerthat is the link above to hints12:45
cpaelzerand I ran it on s390x in a container, it runs just fine outside of the LP-autotest infrastructure12:45
cpaelzerso it is a) false positive and b) no real regression12:45
cpaelzerand c) masked for the same reasons on other arches12:46
cpaelzerat least that is how read the breadcrumbs I found - there is the chance that slangasek might remember more from his changes like http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/247312:46
cpaelzerhttp://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/257012:47
cpaelzer...12:47
cpaelzerit works in a loop on my s390x box12:52
cpaelzerbut test history says arch isn't even important as it fails the same way everywhere12:52
cpaelzerrunning in autopkgtest on x86 now in case I could find something to fix, but I don't see anything actionable yet12:53
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, cdio->vlc is "fixed" I think12:54
LocutusOfBorgI see upstream removed that plugin because deprecated, so I removed it and reuploaded12:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.14.0-11.13]13:12
dokoLocutusOfBorg: still ftbfs13:22
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.122ubuntu8.10]14:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.103ubuntu4.10]14:14
cpaelzerapw: LocutusOfBorg: actually I think I have a real fix for this casync test issue14:16
cpaelzerapw: you didn't override it yet did you?14:16
apwcpaelzer, not yet indeed14:17
cpaelzerok, then I'll try to solve it the right way14:17
LocutusOfBorgdoko, I know, working on it, the first failure is fixed, the upnp one is tricky14:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2]14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2]14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2]14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2]14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2]14:48
chrisccoulsondoko, heh, a rebuild of rust fixed it: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/1.22.1+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2/+build/1382059915:01
chrisccoulsonnot sure what to do about this - it's a regular issue and one that I can't reproduce locally. It can take multiple attempts to get a successful build15:02
cyphermoxcould someone please review grub2 amd64 in the bionic NEW queue? it needs manual review for EFI signing.15:05
apwcyphermox, another one so soon ... and it is in the Unapproved queue15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu2]15:10
cyphermoxsorry, indeed unapproved queue15:20
cyphermoxwhat do you mean another one so soon?15:20
cyphermoxapw: ^15:20
cyphermoxalso, thanks :)15:21
apwcyphermox, there was one on there this mornign15:54
apwi thought15:54
cyphermoxah16:00
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: hmm, there was no need to diverge from Debian to disable the vcdimager plugin when I had just fixed vcdimager16:04
LocutusOfBorgmmm thanks, not sure how I missed that16:24
LocutusOfBorgreverting that part16:24
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, can I force sync it?16:24
slangasekcpaelzer: casync/s390x hint added16:26
slangasekcpaelzer: but a real fix is welcome and not exclusive16:26
LocutusOfBorgI mean, can I force sync vcdimager?16:27
LocutusOfBorgdoko, uploaded it (with a previous wrong changelog entry, but nevermind :) )16:28
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: you don't need my permission to16:28
slangasekyou just need to be correct ;)16:28
LocutusOfBorglovely :) thanks16:28
cpaelzerslangasek: actually the real fix is in b-proposed16:29
cpaelzerslangasek: if it tests fine can I ping you to remove the hints then?16:29
LocutusOfBorganyhow, that plugin will go away in the next vlc release, so my "removal" wasn't entirely wrong... :) but yeah, fixing vcdimager is really better16:29
slangasekcpaelzer: you shouldn't spend your time to ping me to remove the hints16:29
cpaelzerbut just remove them?16:30
slangasekcpaelzer: since the hints are tied to package version, they are no-ops for all new tests once the new casync is in bionic16:30
cpaelzeroh well the hint is evrsioned isn't it - it might work as is16:30
cpaelzerack, we mean the same16:30
cpaelzerok, great, thanks slangasek16:30
slangasekcpaelzer: furthermore, unless you re-trigger all the failed casync tests currently showing on update_excuses, the hint remains relevant until those packages migrate16:31
cpaelzerok16:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wolfssl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wolfssl [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wolfssl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wolfssl [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wolfssl [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wolfssl [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wolfssl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg-1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wolfssl [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg-1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wolfssl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg-1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wolfssl [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg-1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wolfssl [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg-1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wolfssl [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg-1]17:35
acheronukhas anyone an idea why this may occur on arm?17:36
acheronukThe following packages have unmet dependencies:17:36
acheronuk libkf5notifications5 : Depends: phonon4qt5 but it is not going to be installed17:36
acheronukbut "apt-get install apt-get install libkf5notifications5 phonon4qt5" works17:37
acheronuk- one 'apt-get install' there :/17:38
apwacheronuk, got a log please ?17:44
acheronukapw: I was investigating this: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/staging-plasma/+build/1382457917:45
acheronukwhich didn't tell me much, so fired up an armhf chroot to try to see why17:45
apwwhat happens if you try and install phonon4qt4 on its own17:47
apws/qt4/qt5/17:47
cjwatsonyou can just use chdist for that kind of thing - you don't need a full chroot17:47
apwsome kind of unexperessed need to upgrade both together perhaps17:47
acheronukapw: apt seems happy to do that17:48
cjwatsonand it's usually a good idea to try "apt-get build-dep <source package name>", otherwise you won't detect the case of something else in the build-deps declaring Breaks on something in phonon4qt5's deps17:48
cjwatson(for example)17:48
cjwatsoni.e. "apt-get install libkf5notifications5 phonon4qt5" is definitely not a sufficient test in all cases17:48
cjwatsonit could also be something that's been resolved by a newer publisher run, of course17:49
apwacheronuk, on armhfyes ?17:50
acheronukapw: armhf and arm64, but not on any other architectures17:51
* acheronuk wonders what will happen just building against release?17:52
acheronuki.e. not with proposed17:52
acheronukapw: seems to be installing build deps ok in a ppa where proposed has been turned off. hmmmmm....17:58
acheronukI wonder if there is some new Qt changes messing with arm*17:58
infinityCurious.18:02
infinityAsking for just libkf5notifications5 fails with the above error, asking for both works.18:02
infinityThanks, apt.18:02
infinityAnd it's because of vlc-plugin-base, I think.18:06
infinitySo, should clear up when that's published for arm*18:06
infinityMaybe.18:07
infinityacheronuk: ^18:07
acheronukinfinity: thanks for that detective work. I'll wait until that is done then :)18:07
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, please make nghttp2 in main and then I can followup with the two uploads if you want18:07
LocutusOfBorgI already did the merge in a ppa18:08
LocutusOfBorg(I agree about an upload with just http2 enabled and then a new one with the merge)18:08
slangasektjaalton: do you have any insights into what the latest dogtag-pki autopkgtest failures mean? I'm not really buying that adduser broke this.  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dogtag-pki/bionic/amd6419:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (trusty-proposed/main) [1.17.5ubuntu5.7 => 1.17.5ubuntu5.8] (core)19:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-user-docs (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.26.2.1-0ubuntu0.1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)19:55
sergiusensslangasek hello there; question, do you think you would allow me to SRU a new version of patchelf into 16.04?21:03
tjaaltonslangasek: i'll look into it on friday, I'm off until then21:24
tjaaltonthanks for the notice21:24
slangaseksergiusens: my standard answer to an SRU question at that level of detail is "maybe"21:51
slangasektjaalton: cheers21:51
sergiusensslangasek fair enough22:00
=== santa is now known as Guest67357
=== Guest67357 is now known as santa_
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-dep [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.2-2] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-dep [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.2-2] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-dep [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.2-2] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-dep [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.2-2] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-dep [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.2-2] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: willow [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1-2] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-dep [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.2-2] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (trusty-proposed) [3.12.0-2ubuntu1.2]23:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.3]23:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.9.0-1ubuntu1.1]23:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (artful-proposed) [4.9.0-1ubuntu2.1]23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!