| jlamb | still having a problem... with a second NIC on my server | 02:20 |
|---|---|---|
| jlamb | I added emp0s8:`n addresses: [192.168.1.1/24] to my 01-netcfg.yaml file | 02:21 |
| jlamb | and ran sudo netplan apply | 02:21 |
| jlamb | and sudo ip link set enp0s8 up | 02:22 |
| jlamb | but, ip addr still doesn't show the ip4 address for emp0s8 | 02:22 |
| === SmokinGrunts is now known as SG_Sleeps | ||
| lordievader | Good morning | 07:06 |
| cpaelzer | late hi everybody | 08:08 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: hi, iproute2 sru has been accepted, now we need to click on the reds in the excuses page | 11:45 |
| ahasenack | :/ | 11:45 |
| ahasenack | let me check that they are the same errors we saw before in bionic | 11:46 |
| ahasenack | who is chrony's maintainer? | 11:48 |
| ahasenack | he/she is bound to have seen these frequent dep8 test failures | 11:48 |
| EraserPencil | Hi! Anyone has a guide to how I could achieve Dropbox style server without using owncloud or nextcloud? | 12:06 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: ping me once you checked which ones seem flaky tests ok? | 12:17 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: systemd dep8 errors in s390: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/artful/s390x | 12:59 |
| ahasenack | mine is at the top (iproute), but others have failed in the same way | 12:59 |
| ahasenack | FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/boot/grub/grub.cfg' is the error | 13:00 |
| ahasenack | any idea about that? | 13:00 |
| ahasenack | it seems the systemd-fsckd test was skipped in the one lonely success | 13:01 |
| ahasenack | "systemd-fsckd SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that" | 13:01 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: ther eis no grub on s390x | 13:01 |
| cpaelzer | and never will be | 13:01 |
| cpaelzer | like 640k will be enough forever | 13:01 |
| ahasenack | there seem to be two "threads" writing to stdout in the failed test | 13:02 |
| ahasenack | I see lines like | 13:02 |
| ahasenack | (Reading database ... 95% | 13:02 |
| ahasenack | with "Setting up util-linux (2.30.1-0ubuntu4.1) ..." in between | 13:02 |
| ahasenack | let's see why that test isn't being skipped | 13:03 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: I re-triggered the others, but the two s390x issues need to be resolved or skipped | 13:03 |
| cpaelzer | well firejail might ahve been a race with another upload with some luck | 13:04 |
| cpaelzer | or other out of date-ness | 13:04 |
| ahasenack | firejail failed like that before | 13:04 |
| ahasenack | but let me get to that in due time | 13:04 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: once the others re-ran you can check then | 13:05 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: if no others are left ask for overrides in #ubuntu-release | 13:05 |
| cpaelzer | FYI ahasenackthese will eventually go into http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/britney/hints-ubuntu-artful/changes | 13:07 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: the s390 tests were always in a vm, right | 13:09 |
| ahasenack | xnox: around? | 13:10 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: no | 13:11 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: they were in a container up until recently | 13:11 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: which might be why they now are considered regressiosn | 13:11 |
| ahasenack | ah, that explains it | 13:11 |
| ahasenack | I didn't know you could do containers in s390 | 13:11 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: that is what I fixed a few of last week | 13:11 |
| cpaelzer | just as well as everywhere | 13:11 |
| ahasenack | so now that it's a vm, the machine-isolation constraint works and the test is run | 13:12 |
| ahasenack | but it uses grub, and that fails | 13:12 |
| ahasenack | so I need to skip that test in s390 | 13:12 |
| ahasenack | sounds reasonable? | 13:12 |
| * ahasenack looks for the dep8 spec | 13:13 | |
| ahasenack | "Such specific HW need seems rare and there is no e.g. autopkgtest feature to limit Architectures." | 13:18 |
| ahasenack | probably need to add the skip to the test itself then, have it return a fake success | 13:19 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: I'm looking at your dpdk dep8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551158 fix | 13:28 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1551158 in dpdk (Ubuntu) "DPDK dep8 tests failing on non supported platforms" [High,Fix released] | 13:28 |
| ahasenack | you added debian/tests/check-dpdk-supported-arch.sh and you source that in the tests | 13:28 |
| ahasenack | but you also added arch-specific bits to the depends line | 13:28 |
| ahasenack | Depends: dpdk [amd64 i386] <-- | 13:28 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: any ETA on the my MySQL merge review please? | 13:28 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: yes and yes | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: gonna start after I solve these iproute2 migration issues | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: the arch qualifier will ensure it doesn't run at all | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | as it doesn't qualify | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: is the latter necessary? Without the former, the arch qualifier would just lead to a failed test? | 13:29 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: no problem thanks! | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | the checker is mostly if even on an arch there are needs like cpu features | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: it is a double cahnce for error | 13:30 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: without arch qualifier it will try to install and might fail | 13:30 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: so you have to mark where you expect THE INSTALL to work | 13:30 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: of the package | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: the dpdk package does not exist in these other arches? | 13:31 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: only afterwards the script will run and you can sort out and skip tests | 13:31 |
| cpaelzer | yes | 13:31 |
| ahasenack | ok, so you also had an install failure that you are fixing here | 13:31 |
| cpaelzer | yes | 13:31 |
| ahasenack | ok,thx | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | and check-dpdk-supported-arch.sh then does any in depth checks | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | like cpu features | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | or experimental arches like for a while ppc64el had the packages but was not meant to work | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | well that sounds bad | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | it worked | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | but was meant to be experimental/tech-preview | 13:33 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: the story even went further, until s390x had KVM execution the isolation-machine blocked it | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | right | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | that's my case | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | it started failing about 3w ago, with several packages | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | I mean, other packages that triggered the systemd dep8 test suite | 13:35 |
| cpaelzer | yep | 13:35 |
| ahasenack | I'm filing a bug and putting up an mp for it | 13:35 |
| ahasenack | I wonder how the bionic upload passed (of iproute2) | 13:35 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: for the case to complete the story the final change then was https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git;a=commitdiff;h=b179808726394c63b97747b31ca603392c182168 | 13:36 |
| cpaelzer | because since KVM exec it ran into said package-install-issue | 13:36 |
| cpaelzer | as we didn't have the arch qualifier on that yedt | 13:36 |
| ahasenack | can't you negate an arch there? | 13:36 |
| cpaelzer | I don't know | 13:37 |
| cpaelzer | sry | 13:37 |
| ahasenack | ok | 13:37 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: hm, "zipl" is an s390 thing, no? | 13:44 |
| * ahasenack looks around for didrocks | 13:45 | |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: yes | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: zipl is the lilo of s390x | 13:46 |
| ahasenack | I think this test was meant to work on s390 | 13:46 |
| ahasenack | I might be out of my depth here then | 13:46 |
| ahasenack | if platform.processor() == 's390x': | 13:46 |
| ahasenack | enable_plymouth_zipl(enable) | 13:46 |
| ahasenack | else: | 13:46 |
| ahasenack | enable_plymouth_grub(enable) | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | yeah, there is some intention here | 13:46 |
| * ahasenack hops on an s390 to check what platform.processor() returns | 13:47 | |
| ahasenack | it's correct | 13:47 |
| cpaelzer | it is | 13:48 |
| ahasenack | ok, I need to actually run this test there then | 13:48 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: am I supposed to be able to run autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud on s1lp5? Or do I need to use nested vm? | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | ubuntu@s1lp5:~/andreas$ autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud -r artful -o adt-images | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | ERROR: no permission to write /dev/kvm | 13:52 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: I thik lp4 is the one we share | 13:59 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: but long story short no | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: the tests won't work | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | there is a lot of console magic in autopkgtest which doesn't apply | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: create a VM with uvtool, then run the test in that VM (without the autopkgtest around it) | 14:01 |
| cpaelzer | only go the last steps to try inside if you really really need it | 14:01 |
| ahasenack | it must be platform.processor() returning something else over there | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | yep | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | maybe it fails in a VM? | 14:04 |
| ahasenack | the test clearly ran plymouth_enabled = 'splash' in open('/boot/grub/grub.cfg').read(), which is only in enable_plymouth_grub() | 14:04 |
| ahasenack | yeah, let's start ismple. Bring up the vm and run that platform.processor() | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | doing that atm | 14:05 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: hm, there is no uvt-kvm in that s1lp5 host, should I switch to that lp4 one you mentioned? You gave me access to lp5 once upon a time, maybe before lp4 was ready for us? | 14:05 |
| cpaelzer | lp5 is mostly mine for the more sinister experiments | 14:06 |
| ahasenack | there used to be uvt-kvm, since I ran it before there | 14:06 |
| ahasenack | ah, ok | 14:06 |
| cpaelzer | lp4 is meant to be the somewhat stable shared host | 14:06 |
| ahasenack | better remove me from lp5 then :) | 14:06 |
| cpaelzer | it is s390x on a KVM guest as well | 14:07 |
| cpaelzer | trying to run the full test | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | "s1lp4 purpose: jenkins node" :) | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | s1lp3 seems to be the one to use | 14:08 |
| cpaelzer | I wrote it in the wiki | 14:09 |
| cpaelzer | yep s1lp3 | 14:09 |
| ahasenack | ah, found it | 14:20 |
| ahasenack | it's a fix that went into bionic | 14:22 |
| ahasenack | New changelog entries: | 14:22 |
| ahasenack | * systemd-fsckd: Fix ADT tests to work on s390x too. | 14:22 |
| ahasenack | somehow I missed that changelog entry | 14:22 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: it's a bug in artful's package, fixed in bionic. We probably don't sru dep8 fixes, or do we? | 14:23 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: we soemtimes do sometimes not | 14:29 |
| cpaelzer | depends on the case | 14:29 |
| cpaelzer | but systemd uploads are grouped by xnox anyway | 14:30 |
| cpaelzer | you know he collects a bunch and groups them for tests | 14:30 |
| cpaelzer | so he might have a plan or nack already | 14:30 |
| cpaelzer | I guess you are safe to ask for an override on the current version thou | 14:30 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: ^^ | 14:30 |
| ahasenack | thanks, I'm asking in #ubuntu-release | 14:31 |
| cpaelzer | if you want you can explain so in a bug, release team members like to reference something with more context | 14:31 |
| cpaelzer | as it is just a lin in the britney hints | 14:31 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: I have a bug, can you accept the artful nomination? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1736955 | 14:33 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1736955 in systemd (Ubuntu) "dep8 test systemd-fsckd fails on s390" [Undecided,Fix released] | 14:33 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: I don't think we'd usually SRU a test fix on its own, but bundling one with an SRU is absolutely fine. | 14:36 |
| ahasenack | sounds reasonable | 14:37 |
| cpaelzer | approved | 14:37 |
| cpaelzer | it is correct to have that bug task | 14:37 |
| cpaelzer | and you can refer to it for the override | 14:37 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: thx | 14:38 |
| === nitemare is now known as trobotham | ||
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: one more task, zesty is also affected: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1736955 | 15:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1736955 in systemd (Ubuntu Artful) "dep8 test systemd-fsckd fails on s390" [Medium,Triaged] | 15:51 |
| ahasenack | xenial and trusty are fine (no systemd dep8 tests being run in their migrations) | 15:51 |
| pmatulis | for the no_proxy environment variable, i often see addresses and hostnames. the docs say categorically that hostnames should be used. also, i often see both address and name for the local system: 127.0.0.1, localhost. is this necessary? | 16:04 |
| ahasenack | pmatulis: surprisingly I've seen many cases where an app would send a request to localhost via the proxy | 16:07 |
| ahasenack | I don't know why that's not the default | 16:07 |
| joelio | no_proxy has always seemed partially implemented to me | 16:19 |
| boxrick | I have the following lines in my preseed postinstall script to upgrade and configure ansible to the latest version. | 17:05 |
| boxrick | https://gist.github.com/boxrick/ae85da1eedd485930a37a3dfd6e08329 | 17:05 |
| boxrick | But I wish for this to happen in the preseed itself and not the post install | 17:05 |
| boxrick | 3Any ideas? | 17:05 |
| pmatulis | ahasenack, thanks | 17:06 |
| m15k | Does this make any sense? https://gist.github.com/asbachb/9fceeb1d0a00114eec31c6af82ca9805 | 18:34 |
| m15k | Is 2001:470:4242:1042::1/64 the same as 2001:470:4242:1042::1/56 ? | 18:40 |
| ahasenack | m15k: yes, ifup/down will only work with interfaces defined in /etc/network/interfaces | 18:40 |
| m15k | ahasenack: Any idea howto remove the interface? | 18:41 |
| ahasenack | m15k: what ubuntu is this? | 18:41 |
| m15k | 16.04 | 18:41 |
| ahasenack | m15k: does "lxc network list" list that interface? | 18:42 |
| m15k | ahasenack: yes. but "lxc network delete lxcbr0" results in "error: not found" | 18:43 |
| ahasenack | is managed "no" for it? | 18:43 |
| m15k | yes it's no | 18:43 |
| ahasenack | that interface was created when you first installed lxc (not lxd: then it would have been lxdbr0). Are you sure you want to remove it? Do you use lxc or lxd? | 18:45 |
| m15k | Yes I am sure. I think I created it manully via brctl | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | does /etc/default/lxd or /etc/default/lxc (or a name like that) reference it still? | 18:46 |
| m15k | ahasenack: I think that's it. lxc-net bridge was enabled and referenced to lxcbr0 | 18:47 |
| ahasenack | you can probably change its details in that /etc/default/ file | 18:48 |
| m15k | ahasenack: thanks. that was the right hint! :) | 18:48 |
| ahasenack | cool | 18:49 |
| === LudusLight is now known as Ludus | ||
| m15k | ahasenack: Are you familiar with lxd? | 18:53 |
| === Ludus is now known as LudusLight | ||
| ahasenack | m15k: somewhat | 18:53 |
| ahasenack | I use it a lot | 18:54 |
| m15k | I wonder what "Would you like LXD to NAT IPv6 traffic on your bridge?" actually means | 18:54 |
| boxrick | Hello! I am currently using the following line in preseed on Xenial 16.04 LTS d-i base-installer/kernel/altmeta string hwe-16.04 | 18:55 |
| boxrick | So I have have the more up to date kernel | 18:55 |
| m15k | I know what NATting is, but I'm a little bit unsure what's the difference in ipv6 context. | 18:55 |
| boxrick | However this causes all sorts of inconsistencies within my preseed postinstall chroot environment where I need correct libraries | 18:55 |
| boxrick | Is there any way to install *just* the new kernel rather than do the thing it seems to where it installs the old one then updates it later? | 18:56 |
| ahasenack | m15k: well, it depends if you have global addresses in your lxds or not | 19:00 |
| ahasenack | if you don't, and you want to use ipv6 to reach the internet from that container, then you will probably need ipv6 nat, but also a global ipv6 on your host | 19:01 |
| m15k | ahasenack: So when I've a public ipv6 subnet I should disable NAT? | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | if your containers get a slice of that and have global addresses, probably yes | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | I have never natted ipv6, tbh | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | I just get one /64 | 19:01 |
| m15k | ahasenack: You assign a public ipv6 to your containers? | 19:02 |
| ahasenack | no | 19:02 |
| ahasenack | I don't use ipv6 in them | 19:02 |
| m15k | I currently try that. Because of that I play a little bit around with these bridges. | 19:03 |
| m15k | When I type "resolvconf -u" there are dns servers in /etc/resolv.conf that are not configured in "/etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d" any ideas how they get into the generation? | 21:39 |
| genii | Probably by dhcp | 21:39 |
| rbasak | powersj: congrats! | 21:58 |
| powersj | rbasak: thank you :) | 21:58 |
| dpb1 | oh, it happened? | 22:15 |
| dpb1 | nice | 22:15 |
| Neo1 | who know my server can access server sysadmin? | 22:54 |
| Neo1 | does sysadmin of server can access my server? | 22:55 |
| Neo1 | I mean files on my server | 22:55 |
| dpb1 | root can generally access anything that is not encrypted. | 22:57 |
| sarnold | and if the data is ever decrypted on the server, root can access that too. | 22:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!