/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/12/08/#ubuntu-release.txt

cpaelzerhi, the current bionic apache2 upload https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/2.4.29-1ubuntu2 is blocked in proposed for a component mismatch to libnghttp2-14 - the MIR for that is complete in bug 168745407:17
ubot5bug 1687454 in curl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] nghttp2" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/168745407:17
cpaelzerOTOH I do not see it in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt , so maybe I fail to see something else missing in this case07:19
cpaelzerSo I either need an AA to promote that through the mismatch or some guidance on what I overlook in this case07:20
cpaelzerI'd have expected the autopkgtests to run and then be a component mismatch, but the tests block on "unsatisfiable Depends: libnghttp2-14"07:21
cpaelzerBut other than being in universe it is there as far as I can see07:22
infinitycpaelzer: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.txt is what you're after.  Fixing.07:36
cpaelzerinfinity: thanks for the link but I'm puzzled07:41
infinitycpaelzer: By?07:41
cpaelzeris that telling me something else than the expected component mismatch?07:41
infinitycpaelzer: It's telling you what you thought you wanted to see on the other page.07:41
cpaelzerlol07:41
infinitycpaelzer: The other page, of course, won't list the mismatch because it doesn't include -proposed, and thus nothing is pulling nghttp2 into main there.07:42
infinitycpaelzer: Anyhow, it's promoted now.07:42
cpaelzerthank you07:42
cpaelzerI had the link from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess07:42
cpaelzerwould it be reasonable if I added the one you gave me there as well?07:42
infinitycpaelzer: Sure.  Maybe s/show up in the component-mismatches list/show up in the component-mismatches list, or if the dependency is only in proposed, the component-mismatches-proposed list/07:43
cpaelzerdone07:45
cpaelzerchecking the autopkgtests in a few hours then ...07:45
cpaelzerCan someone cancel https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/4.14.1-0ubuntu1 from bionic-proposed08:01
cpaelzerother than tests before upload suggested this needs a bigger cleanup for ubuntu-fan08:01
cpaelzerI want to prepare a proper ..ubuntu2 for that, but that needs some time08:01
cpaelzerso cancelling the current one would be kind to interfer less with others08:01
infinitycpaelzer: Is it interfering in some way?08:02
infinityIt builds no libraries, so the only way it could be causing issues if it it's actually broken somehow.08:02
cpaelzerinfinity: it works in general but not with ubuntu fan08:03
infinityMmkay.  I can delete it.08:03
cpaelzerthank you08:03
infinitycpaelzer: Gone.08:04
doko$ fgrep gvfs *11:32
dokovorlon:force-badtest gvfs/1.34.1-1ubuntu3/s390x11:32
dokoplease add ppc64el, tired about giving that back for every package multiple times ...11:32
dokoor better disable the flaky tests, but that should be a task for the package owners ...11:33
Laneydoko: done11:37
acheronukCould someone please 'force-badtest kdepim-runtime/all/ppc64el kdepim-runtime/all/s390x' ?12:25
acheronukthat is another that seems to want to run tests on those architectures against itself, despite no binaries building12:27
dokoinfinity, slangasek, apw, Laney: please don't work on python-gobject-dev in NBS, using that as an example package mentoring Lucasz12:30
apwdoko, ack12:32
LocutusOfBorgapw, hinting systemd/amd64 badtest will make a lot of stuff migrate, e.g. curl with security fixes inside...12:43
apwLocutusOfBorg, that on the face of it is a terrifying idea ... letting a systemd which is not passing its tests out12:44
LocutusOfBorgI'm running systemd against itself right now12:45
LocutusOfBorgapw, I know, but we are stuck with curl because of that, I pinged xnox above, I don't really know what to do12:46
apwLocutusOfBorg, oh but that looks like the reboot issue ... bah12:46
LocutusOfBorgwe discussed this above already yesterday with cpaelzer and somebody else12:46
LocutusOfBorgI would like to upload the curl merge with new release and http2 support :)12:46
LocutusOfBorgsomebody mentioned a race condition on the bug, but retrying the test is not helping too much12:47
Laneyyet there are 4 more retries running right now12:47
apwLaney, did you make things smarter that we now see the dmesg bits in the logs ?12:48
Laneyif it errors12:48
apwLaney, ahhh only if it is _your_ reboot which triggers it i assume12:48
Laneydoesn't appear to be happening there12:48
Laneythe test carries on, if that bug happens the machine dies forever12:49
apwoh yeah, so that specific instance isn't it, though the one on lsb _is_12:49
apwLaney, ^5 for adding that info, that is awsome12:49
Laneylsb is the same bug, right12:50
Laneybut the others aren't AFAICS12:50
LocutusOfBorgI did run it against itself, lets see what happens12:51
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, libvirt merge ping? :)12:52
Laneyright, but the 4 other retries aren't very helpful I don't think12:53
coreycbbdmurray: we have a few stable uploads that could use a review. nova for xenial and neutron for zesty. would you or someone else on the team be able to take a look?12:58
LocutusOfBorgcan we have systemd forced bad then? curl is still waiting his cve fixes :(14:31
bdmurraycoreycb: Its slangasek's day but if he can't I will.14:50
jbichaplease consider badtesting pinentry/s390x, it's always-failed on most architectures (holding up gtk+2.0 and others today)14:59
coreycbbdmurray: thanks, much appreciated15:02
LocutusOfBorgapw, you ignored linux block, but I think there is a little NBS in proposed cleanup needed15:11
LocutusOfBorgold binaries left on arm64: linux-headers-4.4.0-1080-snapdragon, linux-image-4.4.0-1080-snapdragon, linux-snapdragon-headers-4.4.0-1080, linux-snapdragon-tools-4.4.0-1080, linux-tools-4.4.0-1080-snapdragon (from 4.4.0-1080.85)15:11
apwLocutusOfBorg, indeed, they would have appeared in the last hour or so, i'll sort them out15:11
LocutusOfBorgalso raspi2 needs it :)15:12
LocutusOfBorgbtw the new mainline vboxvideo seems to work great15:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysstat (artful-proposed/main) [11.5.7-1ubuntu1 => 11.5.7-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysstat (zesty-proposed/main) [11.4.3-1 => 11.4.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server)15:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysstat (xenial-proposed/main) [11.2.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 11.2.0-1ubuntu0.2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server)15:37
slashddgadomski, ^15:37
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, uploading curl, the current one won't easily migrate soon16:43
cpaelzerreally16:56
cpaelzerok LocutusOfBorg16:56
cpaelzerI decoupled apache anyway so it is not dpeending on each other16:56
cpaelzerthe tests no more need the enabled curl16:57
cpaelzerand the MIR is done, so you won't hit the component mismatch16:57
LocutusOfBorgI see apache is good yes16:57
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: and btw fro libvirt - target is 3.11 wihch released mid Jan16:57
cpaelzerI'll play with 3.10 which released like a few days ago, but just to work with qemu 2.11 which releases next week16:58
cpaelzerthis is all intertwined and none works well without the other16:58
cpaelzerbut TL;DR it is under control :-)16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libical3 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:11
LocutusOfBorgthanks, the python binding is dep-waiting on it, this is why I care17:12
LocutusOfBorgbtw, speaking on qemu, let me ask a question17:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libical3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:12
LocutusOfBorglong short story: pbuilder-dist bionic arm64 create fails since artful or so17:13
LocutusOfBorgsomewhat it can't install bash, and fails there17:13
LocutusOfBorgsame command, works with sid17:13
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, did you ever experienced that?17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libical3 [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libical3 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libical3 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libical3 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:15
LocutusOfBorgW: Failure while unpacking required packages.  This will be attempted up to five times.17:20
LocutusOfBorgW: See //debootstrap/debootstrap.log for details (possibly the package /var/cache/apt/archives/bash_4.4-5ubuntu1_arm64.deb is at fault)17:20
LocutusOfBorgthis is a paste http://paste.ubuntu.com/26140607/ of the file17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libical3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libical3 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libical3 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libical3 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libical3 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libical3 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]18:44
dokoplease could somebody override the falcon/s390x autopkg test? it's always-failed on the other archs, not sure why it succeeded on s390x. or maybe better mark it as always-failed for s390x18:51
jbichasimilar for pinentry/s390x19:01
dokonow disabled the test in falcon, was disabled in the package build as well19:10
slangasekjbicha: the pinentry/s390x test regression does not appear to have happened as part of the move from lxd to kvm; I don't think this looks appropriate to override19:18
jbichait's not appropriate for it to block gtk2 either, right?19:18
slangasekjbicha: you can trigger a baseline re-test of pinentry against the release pocket to show that it's not a regression in -proposed19:19
jbichait feels odd for a test that doesn't pass on amd64 to block migration…19:20
slangasekah19:20
slangasekpinentry fails on all kvm archs and only passes on lxd archs?19:20
slangasekok, I overlooked that specialness19:21
jbichaoh, that's a neat trick :|19:22
slangasekspectacularly lame that a tty-related test would work in a container and fail on a host19:22
slangasekok, overriding19:22
jbichathanks19:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (zesty-proposed/main) [1.79ubuntu4 => 1.79ubuntu4.1] (core)20:04
acheronukslangasek:  Could you please 'force-badtest kdepim-runtime/all/ppc64el kdepim-runtime/all/s390x' ?20:18
acheronukanother that wants to run tests on those architectures against itself despite no binaries building20:19
acheronuk^^^^ that should make the last of PIM migrate20:19
slangasekacheronuk: done20:31
slangasekcoreycb: this neutron SRU is missing paperwork on LP: #1731595; test case, regression potential20:31
ubot5Launchpad bug 1731595 in neutron (Ubuntu Zesty) "L3 HA: multiple agents are active at the same time" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173159520:31
slangasekbdmurray: ^^ though I see you accepted it into artful-proposed without?20:32
coreycbslangasek: filling that in now20:33
bdmurrayOh, I thought I'd added a comment about accepting it but needing that info20:34
coreycbslangasek: bdmurray: updated with SRU details. thanks.20:39
slangasekbdmurray: "never read the comments" ;-)20:39
slangasekcoreycb: nova is uploaded with the wrong -v option, -0ubuntu4.2 is not accepted into the archive but -0ubuntu4.3 doesn't include the link to LP: #1692397 in its .changes file; rejecting, this will need a reupload20:42
ubot5Launchpad bug 1692397 in nova (Ubuntu Xenial) "hypervisor statistics could be incorrect" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/169239720:42
slangasekcoreycb: also, it's unclear why this wasn't simply uploaded as 4.2, there is no 4.2 anywhere in LP's history20:42
coreycbslangasek: yeah that was a mistake. the old version was in the queue for a while and forgotten.20:42
coreycbslangasek: i'll fix that up20:43
slangasekok20:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nova [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.3]20:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (xenial-proposed/main) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.1 => 2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)20:52
coreycbslangasek: i've uploaded a new nova to xenial20:54
slangasekthanks, will re-review shortly20:55
coreycbslangasek: thanks much20:55
acheronukslangasek: thank you21:09
slangasekcoreycb: ah; and what about LP: #1736149? seems there is already an openstack in zesty-proposed, awaiting verification21:25
ubot5Launchpad bug 1736149 in nova (Ubuntu Zesty) "[SRU] ocata stable releases" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173614921:25
coreycbslangasek: i'm on a roll here :/21:34
slangasekcoreycb: sorry, I blindly paged through that warning message when I reviewed it earlier, I should've flagged it to you the first time around21:34
coreycbslangasek: could we replace the version in proposed with the new one?21:34
coreycbslangasek: probably not, they'd need to have the bugs referenced in the same version of the changelog21:36
slangasekcoreycb: you could upload /nova/ with -v, and then do the SRU verification of 1736149 and the new bug at the same time21:37
slangasekcoreycb: but that only makes us happy if the SRU verification actually takes place21:37
coreycbslangasek: i think i'll just verify the one that is in proposed and that will be 7 days in proposed on monday at which point we could promote it to updates and accept the new one21:40
slangasekok21:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polyml [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1] (no packageset)23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polyml [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1] (no packageset)23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polyml [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1] (no packageset)23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polyml [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1] (no packageset)23:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polyml [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polyml [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1] (no packageset)23:19

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!