[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [01:45] doko: bos02 is on the floor, the arm64 cloud images are missing and as a result every time autopkgtest tries to dispatch a non-bionic test run, it shoots the worker in the head. I've filed an RT. === maclin1 is now known as maclin [08:04] good morning, can anybody please update: ./pitti:force-badtest zodb/1:3.10.5+1.gb28a24c-1 to zodb/1:3.10.7-1build1 [09:17] doko: slangasek: I turned off the missing releases for now [09:17] for the SRU team, that means that they won't get arm64 results [09:17] but should get through bionic [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] [11:45] xnox: are you planning on uploading s390x autopkgtest SRUs just to fix the tests? Or will you be bundling other functional fixes as well? [11:47] rbasak, the latter; i have a stack of things to fix. [11:47] rbasak, was away last week =/ hence the delays [11:47] No problem. [11:47] I ask because I had assumed that we wouldn't be uploading autopkgtest-only SRUs, so that's not relevant here. [11:47] I don't know if that assumption is correct though. [11:48] I wonder if we're all generally agreed we want to avoid that, or if others want to do it. [11:49] rbasak, i have uploaded autopkgtest fixes SRU before. Because it saves so much total time. [11:49] xnox: to be clear, are you saying you've uploaded autopkgtest-fixes-only SRUs? [11:50] Bundling them with functional fixes I think is a separate category (to which I have no objection whatsoever) [11:51] rbasak, in general, in the past, i have done so, yes. I think it was bundled with a "ftbfs in release" fix as well. But at the moment there are no inflight SRUs for src:systemd, and a backlog of things to fix in src:systemd for autopkgs; security fix; functionality bugs. [11:51] rbasak, autopkgtest fixes only, in my mind, falls into a similar catergory as "ftbfs in release". [11:52] should be fixed; better bundled; but is good to fix on its own too - to prevent security team tripping up on that. [11:52] OK. For me, FTBFS in release is a separate category [11:52] An autopkgtest fix is worth having around, but I'm not sure it's worth actually uploading to hit users until a different upload is needed. [11:53] It's unfortunate for SRUs that autopkgtests are bundled in the source package and require a new source upload and binary builds. [11:53] rbasak, possibly useful to upload and keep it in -proposed; with subsequent uploads consuming it. Such that reverse tests can be triggered with all-proposed to pass with flying colours. [11:53] I don't think that necessarily warrants millions of users being made to download new binaries [11:53] xnox: that's a good idea [11:54] there is no need to release into -updates. [12:25] o/ sil2100, could you please approve 'sysstat' uploads for A/Z/X when you have a chance ? (LP: #1720627) [12:25] Launchpad bug 1720627 in sysstat (Ubuntu Artful) "Segfault when using docker and overlay2" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1720627 [12:25] dgadomski, ^ [12:31] slashd: hey! Let me take a look [12:41] slashd: just need to finish up something real quick [12:49] sil2100, sure take your time [12:49] infinity or sil2100: if one of you has a moment today, there's a high priority fix for neutron in the unapproved queue for artful. this is a fix for bug 1731595 (neutron). bug 1734990 is blocking it in proposed but that is verified and should be ready to release. [12:49] bug 1731595 in neutron (Ubuntu Zesty) "L3 HA: multiple agents are active at the same time" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1731595 [12:49] bug 1734990 in nova (Ubuntu Artful) " [SRU] pike stable releases" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1734990 [12:56] coreycb: ACK [13:07] are uploads working fine for people? [13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.2-0ubuntu0.1 => 1:3.26.2-0ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-desktop) [13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (artful-proposed) [11.5.7-1ubuntu2] [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.3+16.04ubuntu1 => 1.3+16.04ubuntu2] (no packageset) [13:27] xnox, things are appearing in the queue since you asked ... [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3+16.04ubuntu2] [13:38] i think my first upload got lost; second retry got accepted normally; and i have no reject mail. [13:39] weird; then again that has not happened in years to me. [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (zesty-proposed) [11.4.3-1ubuntu1] [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (xenial-proposed) [11.2.0-1ubuntu0.2] [13:46] dgadomski, ^ [13:47] coreycb: artful UNAPPROVED you say? I don't see it there, did someone handle it already or am I missing somehting? [13:49] sil2100: apologies, i meant zesty [13:51] thanks sil2100 ! [13:51] sil2100: in which case, the neutron upload is blocked by bug 1736149 and bug 1721286, which are verified and hopefully ready to release. [13:51] bug 1736149 in nova (Ubuntu Zesty) "[SRU] ocata stable releases" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1736149 [13:51] bug 1721286 in horizon (Ubuntu Artful) "Create volume from image displays incorrect AZs" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1721286 [13:51] sil2100: thanks for taking a look [14:01] coreycb: could you re-upload with the source package built with -v2:10.0.3-0ubuntu1 ? [14:02] coreycb: since we need to include the changelog of the previous release that's in the -proposed queue as well, otherwise it will go away [14:03] sil2100: would that be required if the version in proposed is ready to be released? [14:05] coreycb: no, in that case we're good [14:05] Let me check that [14:05] sil2100: ack thanks [14:08] hm, only problem that the 7-day aging period didn't finish, it's the 6th day [14:09] Let me look at the bug, maybe we can exception it [14:12] Ok, let's do this [14:32] sil2100: awesome thanks :) [14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.4-0ubuntu2] [15:07] coreycb: while we're at it, I didn't look at this yet but I see 2 autopkgtest failures for the artful cinder upload, could you take a look and see if those are related? [15:10] sil2100: yep will do [15:11] Thanks! [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgweather (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.0-1 => 3.26.0-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-lowercase-keys [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset) [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-duplexer3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset) [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-timed-out [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.1-1] (no packageset) [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgoocanvas2-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.06-1] (no packageset) [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.14 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.15] (core) [17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.14 => 1.66.15] (core) [20:29] hmm, somebody demoted golang-1.9* today ... promoted again [20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgoocanvas2-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.06-1] [20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-lowercase-keys [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-2] [20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-duplexer3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.4-2] [20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-timed-out [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1-1] === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [21:23] anyone want to look into the madness that is a new merge of the lsb package breaking the c-icap autopkgtest, but only on ppc64el? [21:28] that does sound moderately mad [21:29] (and so far not reproducible for me on diamond) [21:45] doko, speaking of demotions - could "android-tools: android-tools-fsutils" source and binary be demoted? visible on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html not sure why it's not visible on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html yet === Kamilion|ZNC is now known as Kamilion [21:57] Laney: aiui we need to manually create the adt images for each release from the cloud-image base before the runners will work again; but I'm working on that now [21:57] nope [21:57] it uses the upstream ones [21:58] oh? [21:59] https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1733839 [21:59] Launchpad bug 1733839 in Auto Package Testing "Sometimes we use upstream cloud images without harmful packages removed" [Undecided,New] [21:59] we should fix it like that IMO === rfleming is now known as rfleming_ [22:01] there's a race with upstream publication if you just do step 1 [22:01] if there's a newer upstream image it'll use that [22:02] but since it does use them ATM, it's not actually necessary to make adt images [22:04] ah [22:06] xnox: speaking of android, do you want to comment on LP: #1734568 ? [22:06] Launchpad bug 1734568 in android-src-vendor (Ubuntu) "Please remove obsolete Android packages from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1734568 [22:06] (or find someone else who wants to take responsibility for no longer taking responsibility for them ;) ) [22:08] jbicha, i think that's fine; but you need to ping someone to sign off on that, which is not me. Try will cooke. [22:19] https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/arm64/c/clutter-1.0/20171211_221033_b8a9b@/log.gz [22:19] seems to work [22:19] * Laney goes away === bluesabre_ is now known as bluesabre [23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mailmanclient [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.1.1-3] (no packageset) [23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-get-func-name [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hyperkitty [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.4-2] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hyperkitty [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.4-2] [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-get-func-name [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-1] [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mailmanclient [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.1-3]