[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.14.21+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[01:45] <slangasek> doko: bos02 is on the floor, the arm64 cloud images are missing and as a result every time autopkgtest tries to dispatch a non-bionic test run, it shoots the worker in the head.  I've filed an RT.
[08:04] <LocutusOfBorg> good morning, can anybody please update: ./pitti:force-badtest zodb/1:3.10.5+1.gb28a24c-1 to zodb/1:3.10.7-1build1
[09:17] <Laney> doko: slangasek: I turned off the missing releases for now
[09:17] <Laney> for the SRU team, that means that they won't get arm64 results
[09:17] <Laney> but should get through bionic
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.21+dfsg-1]
[11:45] <rbasak> xnox: are you planning on uploading s390x autopkgtest SRUs just to fix the tests? Or will you be bundling other functional fixes as well?
[11:47] <xnox> rbasak, the latter; i have a stack of things to fix.
[11:47] <xnox> rbasak, was away last week =/ hence the delays
[11:47] <rbasak> No problem.
[11:47] <rbasak> I ask because I had assumed that we wouldn't be uploading autopkgtest-only SRUs, so that's not relevant here.
[11:47] <rbasak> I don't know if that assumption is correct though.
[11:48] <rbasak> I wonder if we're all generally agreed we want to avoid that, or if others want to do it.
[11:49] <xnox> rbasak, i have uploaded autopkgtest fixes SRU before. Because it saves so much total time.
[11:49] <rbasak> xnox: to be clear, are you saying you've uploaded autopkgtest-fixes-only SRUs?
[11:50] <rbasak> Bundling them with functional fixes I think is a separate category (to which I have no objection whatsoever)
[11:51] <xnox> rbasak, in general, in the past, i have done so, yes. I think it was bundled with a "ftbfs in release" fix as well. But at the moment there are no inflight SRUs for src:systemd, and a backlog of things to fix in src:systemd for autopkgs; security fix; functionality bugs.
[11:51] <xnox> rbasak, autopkgtest fixes only, in my mind, falls into a similar catergory as "ftbfs in release".
[11:52] <xnox> should be fixed; better bundled; but is good to fix on its own too - to prevent security team tripping up on that.
[11:52] <rbasak> OK. For me, FTBFS in release is a separate category
[11:52] <rbasak> An autopkgtest fix is worth having around, but I'm not sure it's worth actually uploading to hit users until a different upload is needed.
[11:53] <rbasak> It's unfortunate for SRUs that autopkgtests are bundled in the source package and require a new source upload and binary builds.
[11:53] <xnox> rbasak, possibly useful to upload and keep it in -proposed; with subsequent uploads consuming it. Such that reverse tests can be triggered with all-proposed to pass with flying colours.
[11:53] <rbasak> I don't think that necessarily warrants millions of users being made to download new binaries
[11:53] <rbasak> xnox: that's a good idea
[11:54] <xnox> there is no need to release into -updates.
[12:25] <slashd> o/ sil2100, could you please approve 'sysstat' uploads for A/Z/X when you have a chance ? (LP: #1720627)
[12:25] <slashd> dgadomski, ^
[12:31] <sil2100> slashd: hey! Let me take a look
[12:41] <sil2100> slashd: just need to finish up something real quick
[12:49] <slashd> sil2100, sure take your time
[12:49] <coreycb> infinity or sil2100: if one of you has a moment today, there's a high priority fix for neutron in the unapproved queue for artful. this is a fix for bug 1731595 (neutron). bug 1734990 is blocking it in proposed but that is verified and should be ready to release.
[12:56] <sil2100> coreycb: ACK
[13:07] <xnox> are uploads working fine for people?
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.2-0ubuntu0.1 => 1:3.26.2-0ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (artful-proposed) [11.5.7-1ubuntu2]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.3+16.04ubuntu1 => 1.3+16.04ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:27] <apw> xnox, things are appearing in the queue since you asked ...
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3+16.04ubuntu2]
[13:38] <xnox> i think my first upload got lost; second retry got accepted normally; and i have no reject mail.
[13:39] <xnox> weird; then again that has not happened in years to me.
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (zesty-proposed) [11.4.3-1ubuntu1]
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (xenial-proposed) [11.2.0-1ubuntu0.2]
[13:46] <slashd> dgadomski, ^
[13:47] <sil2100> coreycb: artful UNAPPROVED you say? I don't see it there, did someone handle it already or am I missing somehting?
[13:49] <coreycb> sil2100: apologies, i meant zesty
[13:51] <slashd> thanks sil2100 !
[13:51] <coreycb> sil2100: in which case, the neutron upload is blocked by bug 1736149 and bug 1721286, which are verified and hopefully ready to release.
[13:51] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks for taking a look
[14:01] <sil2100> coreycb: could you re-upload with the source package built with -v2:10.0.3-0ubuntu1 ?
[14:02] <sil2100> coreycb: since we need to include the changelog of the previous release that's in the -proposed queue as well, otherwise it will go away
[14:03] <coreycb> sil2100: would that be required if the version in proposed is ready to be released?
[14:05] <sil2100> coreycb: no, in that case we're good
[14:05] <sil2100> Let me check that
[14:05] <coreycb> sil2100: ack thanks
[14:08] <sil2100> hm, only problem that the 7-day aging period didn't finish, it's the 6th day
[14:09] <sil2100> Let me look at the bug, maybe we can exception it
[14:12] <sil2100> Ok, let's do this
[14:32] <coreycb> sil2100: awesome thanks :)
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.4-0ubuntu2]
[15:07] <sil2100> coreycb: while we're at it, I didn't look at this yet but I see 2 autopkgtest failures for the artful cinder upload, could you take a look and see if those are related?
[15:10] <coreycb> sil2100: yep will do
[15:11] <sil2100> Thanks!
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgweather (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.0-1 => 3.26.0-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-lowercase-keys [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-duplexer3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-timed-out [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgoocanvas2-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.06-1] (no packageset)
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.14 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.15] (core)
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.14 => 1.66.15] (core)
[20:29] <doko> hmm, somebody demoted golang-1.9* today ... promoted again
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgoocanvas2-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.06-1]
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-lowercase-keys [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-duplexer3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-timed-out [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1-1]
[21:23] <slangasek> anyone want to look into the madness that is a new merge of the lsb package breaking the c-icap autopkgtest, but only on ppc64el?
[21:28] <mwhudson> that does sound moderately mad
[21:29] <slangasek> (and so far not reproducible for me on diamond)
[21:45] <xnox> doko, speaking of demotions - could "android-tools: android-tools-fsutils" source and binary be demoted? visible on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html not sure why it's not visible on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html yet
[21:57] <slangasek> Laney: aiui we need to manually create the adt images for each release from the cloud-image base before the runners will work again; but I'm working on that now
[21:57] <Laney> nope
[21:57] <Laney> it uses the upstream ones
[21:58] <slangasek> oh?
[21:59] <Laney> https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1733839
[21:59] <Laney> we should fix it like that IMO
[22:01] <Laney> there's a race with upstream publication if you just do step 1
[22:01] <Laney> if there's a newer upstream image it'll use that
[22:02] <Laney> but since it does use them ATM, it's not actually necessary to make adt images
[22:04] <slangasek> ah
[22:06] <jbicha> xnox: speaking of android, do you want to comment on LP: #1734568 ?
[22:06] <jbicha> (or find someone else who wants to take responsibility for no longer taking responsibility for them ;) )
[22:08] <xnox> jbicha, i think that's fine; but you need to ping someone to sign off on that, which is not me. Try will cooke.
[22:19] <Laney> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/arm64/c/clutter-1.0/20171211_221033_b8a9b@/log.gz
[22:19] <Laney> seems to work
[22:19]  * Laney goes away
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mailmanclient [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.1.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-get-func-name [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hyperkitty [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hyperkitty [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.4-2]
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-get-func-name [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-1]
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mailmanclient [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.1-3]