[08:09] morning guys [08:10] here's a graph eric made of 2016-2017 to prove the users drop when +r was set: https://imgur.com/a/M5LnW [08:11] still waiting for ben64's graph, but i bet its gonna be the same [08:12] another idea of alkisg is to set freenode webchat to #ubuntu without reggister, so the captcha can bypass the spammer? [08:13] https://imgur.com/a/MBAip new graph [08:14] tnx and let it know to el unite & dax plz [15:58] lotuspsychje: the graph doesn't make me think anything should be changed [16:04] When did we set +r? [16:06] heres my channel population info going back to 4/1/2016: http://nullcortex.com/upload/screenshots/chrome_2017-12-20_11-06-01.png [16:09] (ubottu reports channel population info directly into graphite) [16:18] Pici: unsurprisingly, around 2017-6, I believe [16:19] I'm not a huge fan of raw log size, since it presumably includes JOIN/PART/QUIT and of *course* they're going to go through the floor with +r [16:19] https://i.imgur.com/A9kVw7H.png is using irclogs.ubuntu.com logfiles, so it's just actual messages. and it's per-day not per-month, so a bit more detailed [16:20] http://nullcortex.com/upload/screenshots/chrome_2017-12-20_11-19-51.png [16:20] Thats population and activity (lines per second) [16:21] going back a little further for comparison: http://nullcortex.com/upload/screenshots/chrome_2017-12-20_11-20-42.png [16:22] *nod* [16:25] anyway. that said, the graph I linked and the graph lotuspsychje linked show broadly the same trend, so at least we're working off the same sort of data there [16:27] I think there are *two* notable things about Pici's user count graph: 1) after +r was set, channel population went down over time for a bit, presumably as unidentified users fell out of the channel, and 2) the channel population has been stable since about a month after that (ignoring what I assume is a freenode outage in mid-August and the 17.10 release in mid-October) [16:28] Unless I'm not reading it right, Pici's activity graph shows a lot less variance than mine does, I'm curious as to what the difference is there. [16:29] although I guess it's ~1/s to 0.5/s over the course of the year, which is sufficiently concerning in and of itself [16:54] remove my bann i month [16:54] more [16:54] just mute [16:55] i use ubuntu 2007 [16:55] Ubuntu bug 2007 in openoffice.org2 (Ubuntu) "can't upgrade opneoffice.org2-common or -base" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2007 [16:55] thanks ubottu [16:55] Dreaman: looking, sec [16:56] Dreaman: you going to behave this time? [16:57] no [16:57] nikolov@ubuntu-ivan:~$ inxi -F [16:57] System: Host: ubuntu-ivan Kernel: 4.14.8-041408-generic x86_64 bits: 64 [16:57] Desktop: Gnome 3.26.2 Distro: Ubuntu 17.10 [16:57] just use ubuntu [16:57] 10 years [16:58] was that "no" meaning you're not going to behave? [16:58] I don't care how long you've been using Ubuntu, I care whether you're going to mess around in #ubuntu if I unban you or not. [16:58] no [16:58] ok [16:59] just unbann me [16:59] can you actually clearly answer my question [17:00] "yes I am going to behave" or "no i am not going to behave" [17:00] no [17:00] then go ahead and part the channel and come back when you decide you're going to behave, thanks [17:01] as you're well aware, we have channel guidelines, and if you're not going to behave and follow them, you ain't getting unquieted [17:01] !guidelines [17:01] The guidelines for using the Ubuntu channels can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Guidelines [17:01] * Cannot join #ubuntu (You are banned). [17:02] my eng is not good [17:02] yes [17:02] may be ask to [17:03] Yes, I've noticed that your English proficiency drops through the floor whenever you want unbanning. It doesn't really help you. [17:03] unbann me [17:04] 1 month i bann [17:04] is normal [17:04] but [17:04] Dreaman: i have an easy solution for getting unbanned. interested? [17:05] ask oper bann me log [17:05] see [17:05] nothing [17:05] log oper bann me reasen [17:06] no [17:06] not interested, got it. [17:06] heh [17:06] just bann for nothing [17:06] ok [17:07] If that's your interpretation of things, then you're better off using a non-English-language channel that you can actually interpret in a reasonable manner. [17:07] remove bann 1 min i see the log [17:07] my hexchat [17:07] ant pastebin ubuntu [17:08] ubuntu-bulgarian not users in [17:09] remove bann and mute me [17:09] simple [17:09] no chat [17:09] Why would I want to do that? [17:10] your choice [17:10] You're quite capable of reading logs without being in the channel [17:10] !1984 [17:10] Official channel logs can be found at https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ . LoCo channels are now logged there too. Meetingology logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ [17:10] no bann no mute [17:11] i permanent bann may be 1 month and more bann [17:11] just aks [17:11] I'm not going to unban you unless you can come up with a coherent assurance that you will not misbehave. That said, your inability to follow directions in here leads me to suspect I shouldn't unban you even *if* you manage to come up with one, because *#ubuntu is clearly not the right place for someone who does not understand simple English* [17:11] as evidenced by you *repeatedly* failing to follow instructions and *repeatedly* getting banned [17:12] ok [17:13] i joint but no need this [17:19] dax 1 year 3 month [17:19] forever [17:20] ? [17:20] Bans aren't time-based, they're removed based on you demonstrating that you will not repeat the behavior that got you banned. [17:21] Coming into #ubuntu-ops and repeating the behavior that got you banned is not a good way to get the ban removed. [17:21] ok [17:21] @mark #ubuntu-ops Dreaman [17:21] The operation succeeded. [17:22] @comment 77462 declined to remove ban despite expiration date on previous comment. See mark 77578. tl;dr: he is incoherent as ever [17:22] Comment added. [20:20] he asked me if he could be downgraded to a quiet [20:20] 07:37 hi remove my bann in ubuntu is 1 month [20:20] 07:37 mute me [20:20] 07:37 is good idea [20:21] yeah, I told him no on that above [20:21] irclogs.ubuntu.com exists, he's quite capable of using it [20:21] true [20:21] he's just gonna start PMing crap to people if he's +q [20:21] and i apparently missed that line when scrolling up === desole is now known as hggdh