[05:05] <flocculant> acheronuk tsimonq2 - yup - that did it - ty :)
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: photofilmstrip [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-crosstalk [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voronota [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.18.1877-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voronota [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.18.1877-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voronota [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.18.1877-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voronota [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.18.1877-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voronota [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.18.1877-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voronota [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.18.1877-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] <acheronuk> flocculant: :)
[06:15] <wxl> slangasek: in case you got sick of the me toos on the BIOS bug and just decided not to pay attention, you probably already now this, but the bug is actually FIXED upstream now, i.e. no need to blacklist the module https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d9018976cdb6eefc62a7ba79a405f6c9661b08a7
[06:18] <valorie> \o/
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.0~r3461-2] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.0~r3461-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] <LocutusOfBorg> hello Release Team, general question:
[11:27] <LocutusOfBorg> in debian a particular package is now building for 64bit only architectures, in Ubuntu we had failures, but we disabled the failing testsuite on non64bit archs...
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.0~r3461-2] (no packageset)
[11:28] <LocutusOfBorg> problem is, there is not a RM bug in Debian, can we remove them in Ubuntu, or is it better to wait until it goes in testing?
[11:28] <LocutusOfBorg> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bpfcc&suite=unstable
[11:28] <LocutusOfBorg> should I file a bug for this?
[11:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I know this is semiautomatically done once Debian drops something, but I don't know how long will it take
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.0~r3461-2] (no packageset)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voronota [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.1877-1]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voronota [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.1877-1]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voronota [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.1877-1]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voronota [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.1877-1]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voronota [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.1877-1]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voronota [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.1877-1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.0~r3461-2] (no packageset)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.0~r3461-2] (no packageset)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.0~r3461-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.0~r3461-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.0~r3461-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.0~r3461-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.0~r3461-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.0~r3461-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted photofilmstrip [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.0-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-crosstalk [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0+dfsg-1]
[13:13] <tsimonq2> wxl, valorie: They recognize that in the bug report, iirc it isn't fixing it.
[13:14] <tsimonq2> wxl: Also, you're looking for the folks discussing it in #ubuntu-devel, not slangasek;)
[13:15] <tsimonq2> flocculant: Cool cool :)
[14:28] <ypwong> wxl, that's wrong, that does not fix it
[14:28] <ypwong> wxl, a lenovo s20-30 that i am debugging with is a baytrail and so it goes to the INTEL_SPI_BYT case rather than INTEL_SPI_LPT
[14:32] <doko_> slangasek: http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/rebuilds/test-rebuild-20170922-artful.html always fails to build, and http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/rebuilds/test-rebuild-20170322.1-zesty.html ftbfs on s390x. what value have succeeding autopkg tests for a ftbfs package?
[17:00] <tsimonq2> ypwong: Thank you for the work you're doing :)
[17:03] <ypwong> tsimonq2, thanks, doing my best :)
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peewee [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peewee [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: yoshimi [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5.6-2] (ubuntustudio)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peewee [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peewee [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peewee [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peewee [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] <bashfulrobot_> slangasek (or any techboard members) - quick question - once we (Ubuntu Budgie) have our LTS proposal done (located here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBudgie/18.04/LTS-Proposal), I know we are to submit to Ubuntu-release and the TB email. But do we need to put ourselves onto the agenda for the next TB IRC meeting to discuss?
[17:29] <bashfulrobot_> (ubuntu-release mailing list)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peewee [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2+dfsg-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peewee [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2+dfsg-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peewee [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2+dfsg-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yoshimi [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.5.6-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peewee [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2+dfsg-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peewee [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2+dfsg-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peewee [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2+dfsg-2]
[18:00] <wxl> :(
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wtf-peewee [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.6+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (xenial-backports/main) [2.21-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.21-0ubuntu2~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (zesty-backports/main) [2.21-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 2.21-0ubuntu2~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (artful-backports/main) [2.21-0ubuntu1~17.10.1 => 2.21-0ubuntu2~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (xenial-backports) [2.21-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (zesty-backports) [2.21-0ubuntu2~17.04.1]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (artful-backports) [2.21-0ubuntu2~17.10.1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-4] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0-4]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wtf-peewee [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.6+dfsg-1]
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flask-peewee [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.7-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)