[01:10] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 17.10 - i386 - i386 built.
[08:33] <flocculant> still getting long time to desktop with the iso - giving up on that
[08:59] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 18.04 - i386 - i386 built.
[09:09] <flocculant> knome: https://contest.xubuntu.org/wallpaper_contest/xubuntu-18-04-community-wallpaper-contest/ ...
[09:10] <flocculant> your submission will be ignored without notice - suggest removed instead as it's not being ignored or you'd not know licence is no good
[09:18] <knome> this is intentional - it'll be removed at some point, but not immediately
[09:19] <knome> or in any quick fashion
[09:19] <flocculant> it's the wrong word
[09:19] <knome> right
[09:19] <flocculant> nope
[09:19] <knome> but removed is wrong too
[09:19] <knome> i mean "right, it's probably wrong"
[09:20] <knome> because it might not be removed until the contest is over
[09:20] <flocculant> doesn't make it wrong
[09:20] <knome> the main point is that there is no notice for the submitter on the license
[09:20] <flocculant> what you're saying is illogical
[09:20] <knome> not to me...
[09:20] <flocculant> if you're ignoring it - how do you know the licence is no good ...
[09:21] <flocculant> removed - makes sense - we could remove it in 2099 - it's still removed :p
[09:21] <knome> sigh
[09:21] <knome> i want to avoid communicating that the team is doing any active removing
[09:22] <flocculant> it's your contest - I'm just pointing errors out 
[09:22] <knome> i know it can be still "right"
[09:22] <knome> maybe i need to reword the whole thing
[09:22] <knome> sec
[09:22] <flocculant> if you don't want me to check things - then I won't
[09:22] <knome> i want to
[09:22] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 18.04 - amd64 - amd64 built.
[09:24] <JackFrost> "Removed from the contest" not "removed from the platform"
[09:24] <JackFrost> There's social removal too.
[09:24] <knome> those are potentially different too
[09:24] <flocculant> JackFrost: wherefor art the cores? 
[09:25] <knome> "Please note that making sure the license is eligible is the submitters responsibility. Any submissions with an ineligible license will be removed at any time (including after the submission deadline) without notice to the submitter."
[09:25] <knome> better?
[09:26] <knome> bbabl
[09:26] <flocculant> knome: don't think you need the () but on the whole yea
[09:26] <JackFrost> flocculant: Should have the newer bionic kernel, to avoid the BIOS bug.
[09:26] <flocculant> ok - but I lost link to cores :)
[09:27] <flocculant> this /core/pending/ shows 14th
[09:27] <JackFrost> Refresh in 30 seconds.
[09:27] <flocculant> oh right :)
[09:28]  * flocculant will add it to his grub list 
[09:28] <JackFrost> There's nothing pressing with them, just figured it was time to refresh.
[09:33] <flocculant> yup
[09:41] <flocculant> JackFrost: well the 64 bit one is installing fine in virt
[09:42] <JackFrost> Still slow to boot?
[09:42] <flocculant> also - this one doesn't take more than 2 minutes to get to desktop
[09:42] <JackFrost> \o/
[09:42] <flocculant> nope - so there's obviously something that's been done to the rest to suit gnome and wayland 
[09:43] <flocculant> says flocculant in his not a dev voice :D
[09:43] <JackFrost> `systemd-analyze blame`?
[09:43] <flocculant> didn't show anything iirc
[09:43] <JackFrost> niiice.
[09:43] <flocculant> and that should be `blame systemd` ...
[09:46] <flocculant> I'll have another look
[09:47] <flocculant> JackFrost: booted and installed and rebooted without any issues at all :)
[09:48] <flocculant> btw - did check how long Ubuntu takes - that took closer to 3 minutes :p
[09:52] <JackFrost> Hah. :P
[09:52] <JackFrost> Well great then, thanks!  Hadn't gotten to it myself even.
[09:54] <flocculant> thank you ;)
[09:56] <flocculant> appears to be ubiquity.service > 1min 7 secs
[09:56] <flocculant> that's after the interminable wait to see the try/install dialogue
[12:01] <knome> flocculant, i was pondering between will/can
[12:53] <gyll> hey guys
[16:53] <knome> hrm, why is one of the images lost on the contest site
[16:56] <genii> knome: Weren't some removed due to copyright/plagiarism or something?
[16:56] <genii> ( I remember hearing something to that effect )
[17:20] <knome> genii, well it's one of the winners, so...
[17:23] <genii> Ah
[17:25] <knome> anyway, time to hack the theme
[22:08] <flocculant> knome: I'd not worry too much about will/can if it was me
[22:08] <knome> flocculant, :)
[22:09] <flocculant> it was really the ignore/remove which was slapping me in the face every time I read it :D
[22:09] <knome> hah
[22:09] <knome> good to have that sorted
[22:09] <flocculant> :)
[22:10] <knome> i did a major update on the theme @staging.xubuntu.org
[22:10] <knome> it should look and feel the same, but it's noe mobile first
[22:10] <knome> there are a few other changes too
[22:10] <knome> if you feel like poking around without a testcase to see if things work, feel free to :P
[22:12] <flocculant> looks a bit broken here 
[22:13] <flocculant> https://i.imgur.com/Kt3OjVb.png
[22:17] <knome> ugh, that wordpress bar
[22:17] <knome> chrome?
[22:18] <flocculant> firefox 
[22:18] <flocculant> 57.0.1
[22:19] <knome> hah
[22:19] <knome> not that it's not broken in chrome too
[22:19] <flocculant> same in chrome
[22:19] <knome> yep
[22:19] <flocculant> oh - you know :p
[22:19] <knome> just checked
[22:20] <knome> let's see if this is easy or not
[22:20] <knome> not
[22:20] <knome> boo
[22:21] <flocculant> :)
[22:21] <knome> but if you hide that bar, it's ok
[22:21] <knome> so it's just broken for logged in users
[22:21] <knome> oh
[22:22] <knome> so *fun*
[22:22] <flocculant> lol
[22:22] <knome> it's fixed
[22:23] <flocculant> yup - agree on ff at least :D