| elbrus | LocutusOfBorg: I agree about the series applying after, but one needs to be reminded to keep them in sync | 07:41 |
|---|---|---|
| elbrus | i.e. a pathc can "not apply" after other patches in series or after new upstream | 07:42 |
| elbrus | and testing on Debian will only automatically catch inconsistencies in the Debian train... | 07:42 |
| elbrus | so I think a helper that notices these things would be great | 07:42 |
| * elbrus isn't going to make it | 07:43 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | true | 08:10 |
| cjwatson | honestly I think debian/patches/<distro>.series has proven to be bad design in most cases. better to construct patches that can have conditional behaviour, if necessary | 09:09 |
| JackFrost | Conceptually I like it, but since most patches that are only for Ubuntu don't get checked if they apply to new upstreams...It's a bit more unfortunate. Mainly works only in cases where the maintainer is the same in Ubuntu as Debian (or stranger cases like libxfce4util that the patch only applies to Debian.) | 09:13 |
| === tacocat` is now known as tacocat | ||
| jbicha | elbrus: btw, the add_X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain.patch should be harmless on Debian | 15:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!