[00:30] <tsimonq2> there
[00:31] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Dot One] (20180105) has been added
[00:31] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Dot One] (20180105) has been added
 was there a reason to pin that
 @Netkas, Yes, because people need to know about it.
 oh wait, my bad. I didn't notice the link attached to it, I thought it was just the bot making it's introduction
[00:35] <wxl> keep an eye out for anyone that has problems with their machine because of Dot One
[00:35] <wxl> there are solutions, even if it appears BIOS is borked
[00:36] <tsimonq2> Right
[00:36] <tsimonq2> wxl: See the FAQ on the blog post ;)
[00:36] <wxl> oooh good job
[00:42] <wxl> suggestion, tsimonq2: put the Spectre/Meldown in a separate section
[00:42] <wxl> also i would avoid listing the machines
[00:43] <wxl> it's not an exhaustive list
[00:43] <wxl> and the issue is not those machines but the serial flashes they contain
[00:43] <tsimonq2> Alright.
[00:44] <tsimonq2> Give me a minute to fix ubuntu-cdimage.
[01:01] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Artful Dot One] (20180106) has been added
[01:02] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Artful Dot One] (20180106) has been added
[05:20] <tsimonq2> wxl: I fixed the announcement a while ago BTW :)
[05:20] <wxl> good
 @wxl, Oooooh
 Looks good
 3.18 eol 😢
 He's referring to this
 Fwd from wxl: <wxl> Meltdown/Spectre-fixed stable kernels now out https://lwn.net/Articles/743246
 (Photo, 1280x1139) https://i.imgur.com/iBsvtTW.jpg Me currently
 @tsimonq2, do i need to fetch/sync the packages locally before building? how do i do that?
 @carriewst, supposedly i need sources.list?
 Morning. We have kernels?
 @VikingRedwolf, When did we not? :P
 ._.
 aaaand patched ones?
 @VikingRedwolf, Patched for what? The bios bug, or meltdown/spectre?
 The bios one we have, and updated isos to test
 Meltdown/Spectre only has a patched kernel landed so far in Bionic -proposed I think
 why are the browsers releasing their own patches? Chrome, the Fox, Opera...
 odd
 btw... HELLOOO RIK!!
 @VikingRedwolf, I would guess to prevent exploitation via malicious website scripts, on systems with an unpatched OS/kernel,  in the waiting period for the full OS fixes.
 makes sense
 could be more to it than that, but not read enough. but that seems more than enough for browsers to patch quickly
 aye
[13:27]  * agaida think: security patched kernels are for weenies :P
[13:27] <agaida> Vikingredwolf: the really nice thing will be the full migitation, but that will take time - so in the maintime the most important tool is brain
[13:27] <agaida> see also https://pb.5id.eu/XS9P - esp. the world rebuild, will be much fun in the next times
[13:28] <agaida> and i guess there will be several rebuilds of the world
 Brains are overrated though :$
[14:18] <agaida> also true
 Specially mine! o__o
[15:03] <agaida> i had a nice blue screen in our company because of the migitation updates today - so i'm more than biased about well and extensive tested panic patches :D
 guys, today it is like 9 months that I switched from Win10 to Lubuntu and I would like to spend a word of appreciation to you all who develop this amazing OS which enabled me to revive old machines and make new ones work better. i really love it, so thanks very much
 sorry for the OT
 hi guys
 what is the different betwin lubuntu desktop and lubuntu alternate?
[22:11] <krytarik> Just the installer basically.
 @carriewst, You don't really build it all at once...
 @AlFXLogic, Thanks for using Lubuntu :)
 @AlFXLogic, 😍