[07:19] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[08:19] <duflu> Morning oSoMoN
[08:22] <didrocks> good morning
=== ackkk is now known as ackk
[08:49] <willcooke> Morning all!
[08:56] <didrocks> welcome back willcooke!
[08:59] <willcooke> How goes didrocks?
[09:00] <didrocks> willcooke: still having some ear issues… didn't get fixed in 6 weeks, so meh :/ happy new year still! :)
[09:02] <lan3y> hey hey
[09:02] <lan3y> oh
[09:02] <lan3y> this again!
=== lan3y is now known as Laney
[09:03] <willcooke> hi Laney
[09:04] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[09:04] <seb128> happy new year
[09:04] <seb128> hey Laney willcooke, how are you?
[09:06] <duflu> Oh hey didrocks, willcooke, Laney, seb128
[09:06] <didrocks> hey duflu
[09:06] <Laney> hey willcooke, seb128, happy new year to you!
[09:06] <seb128> hey duflu
[09:06] <Laney> did you have good holidays?
[09:07] <Laney> hey didrocks & duflu, happy new week to you :P
[09:07] <didrocks> heh Laney ;) happy almost-second-week to you
[09:07] <seb128> Laney, yes, great ones, you?
[09:08] <Laney> didrocks: ready for another christmas right?
[09:09] <duflu> Soon. I hear the Easter eggs are in some shops already
[09:09] <Laney> seb128: very good yes, we had christmas at home for the first time
[09:09] <seb128> ah, nice
[09:09] <Laney> and then went away for new years to some windy mountains
[09:09] <Laney> my hat got blown away
[09:09] <Laney> :( :(((((
[09:09] <seb128> :/
[09:12] <didrocks> Laney: yeah, real holidays this time
[09:12] <Laney> :(
[09:12] <Laney> hugs
[09:13] <Trevinho> Morning
[09:13] <Trevinho> Hi seb128, happy new year!
[09:14]  * didrocks hugs back
[09:17] <seb128> hey Trevinho, happy new year! how are you?
[09:17] <seb128> Trevinho, sorry I forgot to reply to you when you msged me back, was on full holidays mode :)
[09:17] <Laney> hey Trevinho
[09:18] <Trevinho> seb128: eheh, no worries... good that you fully enjoyed holidays
[09:18] <Trevinho> seb128: I'm good, you?
[09:18] <Trevinho> HI Laney
[09:19] <seb128> Trevinho, I'm good as well, thanks :)
[09:19] <Trevinho> Sorry about your hat
[09:20] <Trevinho> seb128: great, had a first christmas with the new family?
[09:23] <seb128> Trevinho, yeah, with the old ones as well :p
[09:23] <seb128> we went back to France and celebrated with everyone
[09:29] <Trevinho> seb128: yeah, sure... Good times i guess
[09:30] <seb128> indeed
[10:04] <andyrock> hey all
[10:05] <duflu> Hello andyrock
[10:15] <andyrock> mmm flight for Budapest overlaps with Italian election day
[10:26] <seb128> hey andyrock, you can vote remote/in advance/through a proxy person?
[10:29] <andyrock> I need to check
[11:13] <popey> Good morning desktoppers!
[11:14] <popey> Is there anything (testing?) I can do to help with bug 1690280 ? :)
[11:14] <ubot5> bug 1690280 in gnome-software (Ubuntu Xenial) "Classic confined snaps don't install" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1690280
[11:17] <oSoMoN> good morning popey
[11:17] <popey> Hey oSoMoN :) Happy New Year (We can still say that now, right?)
[11:20] <oSoMoN> popey, thanks! the year is still new, so I'd say it's fine :) Happy new year to you too!
[11:35] <willcooke> popey, kenvandine can say for sure, but I think we're just waiting on someone to file an SRU.
[11:53] <popey> Someone? Someone on your team or someone else?
[11:54] <willcooke> Someone on our team
[11:54] <willcooke> prolly jamesh
[11:54] <popey> Ok, can this be done as a priority? It's blocking installation of some applications which are promoted as "Editors picks" in G-S :(
[11:55] <willcooke> kenvandine, what popey said ^ can we chase that up pls.  (cc jamesh since I think you're likely to work on it)
[11:56] <popey> thanks
[12:11] <jamesh> popey, willcooke: yeah.  I was looking at it.  I'm just preparing a debdiff for review now (I don't have upload rights to the archive though)
[12:11] <didrocks> well, there is no LP builder yet anyway
[12:25] <popey> We can't get desktop stuff whitelisted?
[12:26] <didrocks> no idea, better to check with cjwatson if anything urgent
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[12:51] <kenvandine> jamesh, i just sponsored that SRU
[12:51] <kenvandine> i need to head out for an appointment, bbl
[13:01] <willcooke> jibel, could you add this to your list pls?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1741447  Needs some verification.  Don't know if you have anything old enough though
[13:01] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1741447 in mesa (Ubuntu) "Unity / Compiz in a crash loop after login, after mesa updates of 2018-01-04" [Critical,Confirmed]
[13:16] <jbicha> didrocks: hi, I replied to bug 1713176
[13:16] <ubot5> bug 1713176 in gnome-characters (Ubuntu) "[MIR] gnome-characters" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1713176
[13:17] <jbicha> seb128: welcome back
[13:17] <jbicha> do you or anyone have an opinion on bug 1740926 ?
[13:17] <ubot5> bug 1740926 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Demote gitk to universe?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1740926
[13:17] <didrocks> jbicha: yeah I saw I'll +1
[13:18] <didrocks> jbicha: however, as you are the uploader, I was expecting you would add the override :)
[13:18] <didrocks> but not a blocker anyway, just a suggestion
[13:19] <didrocks> just miss the desktop team bug subscriber and we are good to go IMHO
[13:19] <didrocks> ah, it's done, I had an half page refreshed
[13:20] <didrocks> just tell me once you seed it and I'll promote
[13:20] <chris__> There's a 16.04 Unity bug that so far seems to have been reported at least four times in the last three days (bug numbers 1741605 1741874 1741502 and 1741771). Do the relevant developers know about it?
[13:21] <jbicha> didrocks: ok, we'll need to wait for LP to start building again for promotion then
[13:23] <didrocks> yep
[13:24] <willcooke> chris__, yes.  Bug #1741447 is the one where the work is happening
[13:24] <ubot5> bug 1741447 in mesa (Ubuntu) "Unity / Compiz in a crash loop after login, after mesa updates of 2018-01-04" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1741447
[13:28] <chris__> willcooke, thanks. Good. 1741447 must be the first report of it, which I didn't see.
[13:33] <willcooke> chris__, sometimes it's not always the first report which gets picked up, sometimes it's the one with the best description, sometimes it seems random :)
[13:34] <jbicha> didrocks: did you want to handle LP: #1734885 soon too (since it has a similar "theme" to the Characters app) ?
[13:34] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1734885 in fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fonts-noto-color-emoji" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1734885
[13:34] <didrocks> jbicha: can do this week, yeah
[14:19] <seb128> jbicha, hey, no I don't have an opinion on that one being in main or universe
[14:20] <jbicha> does anybody want gitk in main?
[14:22] <Laney> shouldn't think so
[14:23] <seb128> I don't really see a need for it to be in main personnally
[14:24] <jbicha> could you one of you +1 the bug, in case the Archive Admins are looking for official approval
[15:04] <didrocks> jbicha: let's do it right now
[15:04] <didrocks> would be easier
[15:05] <didrocks> I'll let you commit the removal and I'll run the demotion
[15:06] <jbicha> I committed the removal, but maybe we should wait for component-mismatches to update first?
[15:06] <didrocks> could do if you aren't sure it's the only thing pulling it in
[15:07] <Laney> you should get the message asking for it to go back to main if there is something and it's demoted
[15:09] <jbicha> I think sources are tk8.6 and tcltk-defaults and the binary package gitk
[15:09] <didrocks> indeed, but I guess Jemery wants to avoid this
[15:16] <jbicha> oh, idle also pulls in tk (via python3-tk)
[15:16] <jbicha> doko: do we need idle in main?
[18:09] <willcooke> night all
=== linuxturtle is now known as jbrett
[18:44] <oSoMoN> night