[00:42] wallyworld: do we indent error messages that go to a new line… i think i’ve seen it before, but can’t find it. [00:43] one sec, otp [00:43] hml: for example? [00:43] i’m adding a line to the create back up error message… to suggest using juju switch or the -m flag [00:47] thumper: you got a sec? [00:47] hml: i can't recall one, just use no indent and see how it looks [00:48] wallyworld: yeah [00:49] thumper: see pm for link [00:56] Am I good to upgrade my test controller to 2.2.9? [01:00] babbageclunk: ^^^^ ho'ws the release? [01:01] wgrant: streams aren't updated yet [01:01] AH heh [01:08] * thumper afk for a bit to run kids around [01:08] bbl === thumper is now known as thumper-afk === thumper-afk is now known as thumper [06:03] wallyworld: there's probably a more appropriate place to fix this, but I don't know who/what/where/how, and this works: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8268 [06:03] axw: yeah, looking now [06:03] ta [06:31] wgrant: sorry for the delay - 2.2.9 should be available for you to upgrade your test controller now === frankban|afk is now known as frankban === frankban is now known as frankban|afk === frankban|afk is now known as frankban === frankban is now known as frankban|afk [20:31] babbageclunk, looks like you got through everything yesterday in the end [20:32] balloons: yup - can I talk through the steps with you before I update the template? [20:33] babbageclunk, absolutely. I think you hit the same issue in verify-upgrade I did -- it seems like a juju bug [20:33] that is; you can't upgrade to a specific agent in the proposed stream [20:34] Right - we have code that picks a stream based on the version number, so we'll only look in proposed if the version's an rc. === akhavr1 is now known as akhavr [20:36] I guess adding an agent-stream option to upgrade-juju would do it. [20:36] babbageclunk, that does kind of ruin our cautionary steps then at pushing to proposed first [20:37] babbageclunk, but that's nice to know it's intentional. The verify-upgrade test though needs some love either way, so I'm glad you got so experience with it [20:41] I was going to suggest always looking in proposed when there's a specified version, but I guess that also would break the safety of being able to try upgrading before it was released... [20:41] Or does it? [20:41] Actually I think that would be ok. [20:41] And probably not difficult. === babbageclunk changed the topic of #juju-dev to: #juju-dev === babbageclunk changed the topic of #juju-dev to: #juju-dev https://jujucharms.com | On-call reviewer: see calendar | Open critical bugs: None [20:57] babbageclunk, so shall we chat now? [20:59] balloons: yes please... [20:59] just making a ho [21:00] balloons: https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/balloons?authuser=1 [21:02] * balloons twiddles thumbs waiting for google [21:03] babbageclunk, hmm.. apparently I can't connect to hangouts [21:03] It took me a few goes - maybe they're having issues? [21:04] now i don't see you in the call.. sigh [21:05] weird - I'm there [21:05] now I'm getting an error too. [21:32] balloons: babbageclunk: wanna take it into release call? [21:33] trying to join yes === agprado is now known as agprado|afk