[00:01] <valorie[m]> Sorry, too much to type
[00:02]  * valorie[m] uploaded an image: 20180109_160114.jpg (4806KB) <https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/mIztlWiOXyRQcgfadSCMvGEb>
[00:03] <valorie[m]> Changing to telegram on other laptop
[00:04] <acheronuk> can you boot into the previous kernel?
[00:06] <tsimonq2> valorie[m]: Have you tried just history.log with no extensions?
[00:07] <tsimonq2> And that's because pastebinit can't deal with compressed data ;)
 I'll move to #kubuntu for support, sorry about that
 and I'll try to boot to previous kernel
 dunno why I didn't think of that
 thanks, @acheronuk
[00:18] <valorie> and logging into the older kernel worked
[00:18] <valorie> http://paste.ubuntu.com/26356535/ is interesting
[00:21] <valorie> http://paste.ubuntu.com/26356544/ for the log
[00:21] <valorie> so much easier to type when it's not so tiny I need a magnifying glass to read it
[00:23] <valorie> nothing nvidia in there though
[00:26] <acheronuk> you use nouveau then?
[00:26] <valorie> I guess?
[00:27] <valorie> I thought I was using nvidia but....
[00:28] <valorie> I'm not using the firmware at least
[00:28] <valorie> apt-cache policy nvidia gives me nothing
[00:29] <acheronuk> not entirely sure with that. I've used the proprietary driver for ever I think
[00:29] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: any idea?
[00:30] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: No clue, if valorie was a random person in #lubuntu I'd suggest going to #ubuntu for help because it seems to be a distro-neutral thing :)
[00:31] <acheronuk> at least you have a working session with the old kernel. that is more than can often happen with these things!
[00:34] <valorie> oh, driver manager
[00:34] <valorie> how did I forget
[00:36] <valorie> oh, I'm using 381.22 nvidia
[00:37] <valorie> how does one decide if there is a better driver? I think I just allowed driver-manager to choose, or chose what it advised
[00:38] <valorie> oh, it recommends upgrading to the 384 when I scroll
[00:38] <valorie> sheehs, what a ditz today
[00:38] <acheronuk> I always go with the newest with support for my card
[00:39] <valorie> upgrading
[00:39] <valorie> I think I'll postpone restarting until we return from or finish dinner
[00:39] <acheronuk> see if it builds a module for the new kernel as well
[00:40] <valorie> it's being really slow
[00:40] <valorie> so I imagine so
[00:41] <acheronuk> gone midnight here, so I'm going to have to say goodnight anyway
[00:41] <valorie> niters
[00:41] <valorie> and it doesn't tell me to reboot
[00:41] <acheronuk> if that new kernel hates Nvidia, there will no doubts be others shouting on IRC/forums/askubuntu soon ;)
[00:41] <valorie> ttyl
[00:42] <valorie> sweet dreams and thanks again
[00:42] <acheronuk> ZZZZzzzz....
[00:43] <acheronuk> hope you sort it :)
 me too
 now to update *this* lil lappy
[04:42] <valorie> by the way, that update went great
[04:43] <valorie> I will maybe upgrade it to Bionic next week
[05:01] <tsimonq2> \o/
[07:03] <acheronuk> :D
[21:41] <valorie> so with the amount of testing we have, do you think our dot one images should be marked as ready to go?
[21:42] <valorie> gosh I miss falkon
[21:50] <tsimonq2> valorie: I'm +1 on marking Kubuntu 17.10.1 as gtg
[21:51] <valorie> acheronuk: I'd like to hear your opinion too
[21:51] <valorie> I'm inclined to dooot
[21:51] <valorie> but we do have some bugs
[21:51] <tsimonq2> Are they regressions compared to the last point release?\
[21:52] <valorie> no
[21:52] <valorie> but gosh it would be nice to see that fix made
[21:56] <tsimonq2> Right
[21:56] <tsimonq2> It's doable.
[21:56] <valorie> weeee, he's lookin
[21:56] <tsimonq2> Who is?
[21:57] <valorie> ‎cyphermox
[21:57] <tsimonq2> Ah, ok.
[22:09] <acheronuk> doubt a fix will happen for tomorrow. but I have permission to mark ready tomorrow during the day UK time, if not
[22:10] <tsimonq2> Lubuntu is going to mark as ready shortly.
[22:11] <acheronuk> in fact, I think a fix is just unreasonable for this
[22:11] <acheronuk> this is a one issue re-spin
[22:12] <tsimonq2> Right.
[22:12] <tsimonq2> I agree with that.
[22:12] <acheronuk> any regressions = no = ready
[22:12] <tsimonq2> Right, and "regression" is defined as "compared to 17.10 did anything break?"
[22:13] <acheronuk> indeed. oem was furked on that
[22:15] <tsimonq2> Kool, glad we're on the same page :)
[22:16] <acheronuk> + even if possible, updating the oem stuff to fix kubuntu's issue, would likely require a round of re-tests by all flavours
[22:17] <acheronuk> lets just get this out, and deal with for 18.04
[22:18] <acheronuk> but not forget it until too late for a release as we seem to have done since 2015!
[22:18] <tsimonq2> Right
[22:20] <acheronuk> an LTS without a working OEM install for Kubuntu would be soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad
[22:30] <valorie> ok
[22:30] <valorie> I just saw an opening with cyphermox and jumped on 'im
[22:31] <valorie> marked as ready