[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-109.132] (core, kernel)
[05:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-109.132~14.04.1] (kernel)
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-109.132]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-109.132~14.04.1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-25.29~16.04.2]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-26.29~16.04.2] (kernel)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-26.29~16.04.2]
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Artful Dot One] has been marked as ready
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Artful Dot One] has been marked as ready
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (artful-proposed/main) [1.8.4-1ubuntu3 => 1.8.4-1ubuntu3.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Artful Dot One] has been marked as ready
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Artful Dot One] has been marked as ready
[21:18] <coreycb> bdmurray: hi, would you mind rejecting horizon from the xenial unapproved queue? I'm going to upload a new version with another bug fix.
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected horizon [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:9.1.2-0ubuntu4]
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (xenial-proposed/main) [2:9.1.2-0ubuntu3 => 2:9.1.2-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[21:53] <valorie> cyphermox: any thoughts on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1447144 which is still being reported for Kubuntu 17.10.1 ?
[21:53] <valorie> oddly enough some of the oem tests *did* pass
[21:54] <cyphermox> initial thoughts are not to be written down in polite IRC
[21:54] <cyphermox> but yeah, boo :(
[21:54] <cyphermox> I'll have a look now
[21:56] <valorie> ref: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382694#c3
[21:56] <valorie> thanks much, cyphermox
[22:02] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Hello, when you have a moment, could I please get a review on this? :)  https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/ubuntu-archive-tools/change-default-branch-when-branch-made-git/+merge/335863
[22:06] <cyphermox> valorie: ah, is oem set to autologin by default?
[22:28] <valorie> cyphermox: um
[22:28] <valorie> I haven't a clue -- acheronuk?
[22:29] <valorie> or tsimonq2 have you perhaps looked at that?
[22:29] <valorie> all I've ever done with oem is tested ISOs
[22:29] <tsimonq2> I haven't, and right now I'm focused on getting Lubuntu 17.10.1 marked as ready, but I'll be happy to look at what 14.04 does after that ;)
[22:32] <valorie> cyphermox: to be clear, I don't want to hold up dot.one
[22:33] <valorie> but this should certainly be fixed before beta so we can test the heck out of it
[22:34] <valorie> I've marked Kubuntu dot one as ready
[22:34] <acheronuk> +1
[22:35] <acheronuk> It's annoying as hell, but not a regression
[22:35] <acheronuk> but I would be very unhappy letting it pass for any 18.04 pre-release milestone
[22:36] <valorie> right, alpha 2 would be even better
[22:36] <valorie> or even alpha 1 if there is one
[22:37] <acheronuk> we'll see. just as long as it fixed and testing for 18.04
[22:38] <acheronuk> very unhappy may have been a overstatement, but I would not like to see it go unaddressed for too long
[22:44] <cyphermox> valorie: ok
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Dot One] has been marked as ready
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Dot One] has been marked as ready
[22:49] <acheronuk> cyphermox: sorry to nag. If you want fix testing etc, please shout!
[22:50] <acheronuk> or help figuring out what the hell sddm wants to do
[22:51] <acheronuk> sddm devs are sorta KDE ones, so I can nag them