[00:53] <DoubleDee> balloons?
[01:05] <DoubleDee> oof! my switch is broken.... rip wifi for wverything else in my room
[01:24] <Leonidesu> hi
[08:31] <pranavgade20> Hi there!
[08:32] <pranavgade20> is elopio here?
[08:41] <pranavgade20> hi guys
[11:48] <omairqazi> balloons wxl tsimonq2 mallen Carla Sella: there is a problem with this testcase http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/385/builds/164228/testcases/1689/ It does not refer to Lubuntu Alternate amd64.
[12:29] <surya> hi
[12:31] <omairqazi> hi
[12:32] <omairqazi> balloons wxl tsimonq2 mallen Carla Sella: there is a problem with this testcase http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/385/builds/164228/testcases/1689/results It does not refer to Lubuntu Alternate amd64.
[12:35] <daniellimws> didrocks, regarding this task, https://codein.withgoogle.com/tasks/5411356859695104/?sp-organization=5133577048031232&sp-is_beginner=False, are the changes to be made to .bashrc?
[12:35] <daniellimws> https://codein.withgoogle.com/tasks/5411356859695104/?sp-organization=5133577048031232&sp-is_beginner=False
[12:40] <didrocks> daniellimws: that's one option, indeed, basically, it's looking at what fedora is doing and see if that can apply to us. Their solution is working for some releases from what I heard
[12:41] <konrad11901> sergiusens: could you check my submission please? It's been in "Submitted for review" state for about 66 hours. If you think that something should be corrected, please say so. Thanks!
[12:42] <daniellimws> didrocks, ok thanks :), will be taking up that task if there's still time after I finish my current one
[12:43] <didrocks> daniellimws: sounds awesome! :-)
[12:44] <daniellimws> didrocks, my blender keeps crashing halfway through rendering the videos on my crappy computer but i'm rendering them now to individual png files and will be combining them to ffmpeg, should be able to send you the files very soon
[12:44] <daniellimws> hehe taking 1.5 hours to render less than one minute worth of video
[12:46] <didrocks> daniellimws: yeah, unsurprised ;)
[13:07] <parth_> hi
[13:08] <daniellimws> parth_, hi, welcome!
[13:08] <parth_> thak you
[13:12] <coolpolygons> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/384/builds/163658/downloads
[13:12] <coolpolygons> y is this link's http link giving me a copy of 17.10 lubuntu :(
[13:13] <coolpolygons> i need to re-do my test because of that :(((((
[13:13] <coolpolygons> does anyone have a link to the bionic version of lubuntu for QA?
[13:19] <coolpolygons> nvm its just 18.04 shown as 17.10 during installation, lemme file a bug report
[13:22] <popey> the installer is always outdated
[13:22] <popey> the slides in the installer never usually get updated until quite late in the development
[13:31] <coolpolygons> gotcha
[13:32] <coolpolygons> tsimonq2: can you review mine? (We talked this over but whatev still uploading here also) https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/6683038199054336/
[13:44] <balloons> omairqazi, you are right. Can you file a bug for it? You could even attempt to fix it
[13:45] <balloons> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+filebug
[13:45] <omairqazi> balloons: i already did so when doing iso testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1742665
[15:50] <Nissaar> anyone completed the package an electron snap task ?
[15:50] <Nissaar> i need help
[16:01] <m4sk1n> Nissaar: how can we help you?
[16:04] <coolpolygons> tsimonq2 can you review mine if you got the time? https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/4805088310722560/ thank you :D
[16:24] <daniellimws> hi are degville and davidcalle around? I've submitted a couple of tutorials hope you guys can check them before gci ends.
[16:25] <degville> daniellimws: yep, we're both here.
[16:27] <daniellimws> degville, can you have a look at these if you are free? https://github.com/canonical-websites/tutorials.ubuntu.com/pulls/daniellimws
[16:31] <davidcalle> daniellimws: hey, the debugging one is on my list of things to review this week,  no worries :)
[16:32] <degville> daniellimws: I'll take a look, but I can't see you linked to the task instances in gci? eg. Connecting to an iSCSI target.
[16:32] <daniellimws> sorry I haven't claimed any of them yet
[16:32] <daniellimws> just did them in advance hope that does not violate any rules
[16:38] <degville> daniellimws: I'm not sure, but there's obviously a risk someone else may assign themselves a task while your tutorial is waiting for review. I'll look at the iSCSI one asap though.
[16:42] <daniellimws> degville, thanks a lot
[17:00] <Nissaar> https://gist.github.com/popey/7803cfbda9b337fab792c403e50e4709 i actually followed this tutorial. and when it comes to npm run dist or npm run lint(since this is what contains the scripts section) this is the output: https://paste.ubuntu.com/26366666/
[17:00] <Nissaar> m4skln:
[17:00] <popey> heya
[17:01] <popey> looks like you need "npm run build-linux" maybe?
[17:01] <m4sk1n> Nissaar: so it’s the correct output, no errors
[17:02] <popey> lint just does checks to make sure it's all valid
[17:02] <m4sk1n> yup, that’s what I said
[17:02] <popey> or indeed "npm run linux"
[17:02] <m4sk1n> he asked on askubuntu
[17:02] <popey> ah okay :)
[17:04] <Nissaar> it showing another things,downloading etc... ill wait and come back to you if anything goes wrong
[17:04] <Nissaar> thanks
[17:09] <Nissaar> popey:https://paste.ubuntu.com/26367133/
[17:09] <Nissaar> m4skln:https://paste.ubuntu.com/26367133/
[17:09] <Nissaar> can you please check this
[17:10] <popey> Nissaar: did you update the electron-builder version?
[17:12] <Nissaar> uve modified it in the package.json file
[17:13] <Nissaar> popey:
[17:13] <popey> looks like it's missing icons2png again
[17:15] <Nissaar> popey: what should be done ?
[17:15] <popey> apt install icnsutils
[17:15] <popey> i think
[17:15] <popey> that's one thing that's missing
[17:18] <Nissaar> popey:https://paste.ubuntu.com/26367169/
[17:19] <popey> wow, not sure what's going on there
[17:19] <popey> what version of electron-builder did you specify?
[17:20] <Nissaar> popey:19.53.0
[17:21] <popey> what version of node do you have there?
[17:21] <popey> node --version
[17:22] <Nissaar> 4.2.6
[17:22] <popey> ahh that's likely the issue!
[17:23] <Nissaar> what should i do ?
[17:23] <popey> the guide I wrote mentions using the latest version of node from nodesource
[17:23] <popey> right near the top iirc
[17:24] <Nissaar> should i install it in the ndm directory ? or in my home directory ?
[17:24] <popey> there's a two-line thing to update node.. one moment
[17:24] <popey> https://github.com/nodesource/distributions#debinstall
[17:24] <popey> curl -sL https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_9.x | sudo -E bash -
[17:24] <popey> sudo apt-get install -y nodejs
[17:25] <popey> then in the ndm directory run "npm install" then re-run the npm run you ran before
[17:26] <Nissaar> the version is still the same
[17:26] <Nissaar> i run sudo apt-get upgrade -y nodejs
[17:27] <Nissaar> it seems to be updating
[17:34] <Nissaar> it has updated with you commands. thx
[17:34] <popey> Awesome!
[17:35] <Nissaar> popey:https://paste.ubuntu.com/26367255/ can you pllease check this
[17:36] <popey> sure
[17:36] <popey> do what it says on line 17
[17:36] <Nissaar> im run the npm rebuild node-sass --force
[17:36] <popey> ok
[17:40] <coolpolygons_> wxl there?
[17:41] <wxl> haven't had sufficient caffeine yet, but yes, coolpolygons_
[17:42] <coolpolygons_> wxl sorry to hear that :( i signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct, you can check it here: https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/4818392508792832/
[17:42] <wxl> coolpolygons_: like i said, i do get notifications XD
[17:42] <coolpolygons_> alright :D
[17:43] <coolpolygons_> may i recommed a double shot espresso xD
[17:52] <omairqazi> kyrofa elopio popey flexiondotorg: hi ! please take a look at my submission https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/5259110377324544/
[17:53]  * popey looks
[17:53] <daniellimws> popey, regarding my uber snap, is it ready for the task to be approved?
[17:53] <omairqazi> popey please reply on gci itself
[17:56] <popey> Done :)
[17:57] <popey> daniellimws: Yes!
[17:59] <daniellimws> popey, is it ok if I claim that tomorrow? going to bed now..
[18:00] <popey> sure thing!
[18:00] <daniellimws> thanks!
[18:04] <Nissaar> popey:https://paste.ubuntu.com/26367386/
[18:04] <Nissaar> popey: can you check as from line 72 please ?
[18:05] <popey> right, there's two options here :)
[18:05] <popey> 1, install the rpm tools to make it build an rpm
[18:05] <popey> 2, put snap before rpm in the package.json ;)
[18:05] <Accelerator> kyrofa, Think you could give yet another look at my submission?
[18:05] <Nissaar> popey:how do i download rpm tools?
[18:05] <popey> Nissaar: for 1), apt install rpm
[18:05] <popey> for 2) just put snap before rpm, it will make a snap okay then fail when it gets to rpm.
[18:06] <popey> the best thing is to install rpm, so that works :)
[18:06] <Nissaar> thanks im installing rpm
[18:09] <Nissaar> popey: i need help for the 2nd step
[18:09] <popey> oh, you don't need to do 2)
[18:09] <popey> you either do 1 or 2
[18:09] <popey> if you installed rpm, you're done, rebuild and it should work
[18:09] <Nissaar> i did 1.
[18:10] <popey> great
[18:10] <Nissaar> i run nom run build-linux again ?
[18:10] <popey> yup
[18:11] <Nissaar> im on it
[18:15] <Nissaar> popey: after running npm run build-linux, i should have obtained a snap file right ?
[18:15] <popey> yeah, probably an rpm and appimage and other stuff too
[18:16] <popey> in the dist/ or release/folder maybe?
[18:16] <Nissaar> ndm-1.2.0x86_64.rpm is it this one ?
[18:16] <popey> well, that's the rpm :)
[18:17] <Nissaar> snap install dist/applicationname.snap --dangerous what do i do with this command ?
[18:17] <popey> is there a snap file there?
[18:17] <Nissaar> instead of dist it will be releases for me. what about he '.snap' ?
[18:17] <Nissaar> no there is not
[18:18] <popey> can you pastebin the log of the build?
[18:18] <popey> all of it
[18:18] <popey> and did you add snap to the package.json?
[18:19] <Nissaar> where should i add the snap support ?
[18:19] <Nissaar> i mean in which section ?
[18:20] <Rurecznik> hi everyone
[18:20] <popey> https://github.com/720kb/ndm/blob/master/package.json#L54
[18:20] <Nissaar> i think i missed that part
[18:20] <popey> add a target
[18:20] <Nissaar> i doing it again
[18:20] <popey> just add  a line above "deb",  which is "snap",
[18:20] <Nissaar> there already was deb,zip and rpm.
[18:21] <Nissaar> is it necessary to add it before deb? coz i added it last ?
[18:21] <popey> nope
[18:21] <popey> It will build in the order you put them
[18:21] <popey> if you put snap first, it builds the snap first and you can the install it while it builds the others
[18:22] <Nissaar> guess ill have to wait now :D
[18:22] <coolpolygons_> popey: there?
[18:22] <popey> it should build pretty quick the second time, caching stuff
[18:22] <popey> maybe :)
[18:22] <popey> coolpolygons_: hi
[18:22] <popey> i am, but not for long, i need to go afk soon
[18:22] <Nissaar> popey: btw, can i use this tutorial for the package and publish electron snap task ?
[18:22] <coolpolygons_> yeah so if you dont have any errors for the snap tutorials, then do we just attach a screenshot as a proof of install and say "no bugs" in the submission?
[18:23] <popey> coolpolygons_: yup!
[18:23] <coolpolygons_> and also i went ahead and did a bunch of them while waiting for a review, so you might get a lot of notifications :P
[18:23] <coolpolygons_> alright, thank you :D
[18:23] <popey> haha
[18:23] <popey> I'll look out for them
[18:23] <coolpolygons_> yep
[18:23] <popey> Nissaar: not sure I understand
[18:24] <elopio> popey: here's a new task proposal: https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/6406667723866112/ what do you think?
[18:24] <popey> elopio: really not sure about that
[18:24] <elopio> was just an idea, feel free to not approve it :D
[18:24] <popey> elopio: i have seen other projects do things like this, seems a bit artificial
[18:25] <Nissaar> popey: i mean for the ' package and publish an electron snap task ' can i use this tutorial : https://gist.github.com/popey/7803cfbda9b337fab792c403e50e4709
[18:25] <popey> Nissaar: yeah, this is totally for that
[18:25] <elopio> popey: I disagree, of course. I added a requirement to have finished other tasks. But I can understand if you drop it.
[18:26] <elopio> also popey, you never published the lxd one: https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5500534314237952/
[18:26] <elopio> is it missing something?
[18:26] <Nissaar> ahh ok thx
[18:26] <popey> elopio: completely missed it, sorry
[18:26] <popey> elopio: done
[18:26] <elopio> thank you!
[18:27] <popey> elopio: feel free to get a second opinion about happyness from flexiondotorg  when he's about
[18:27] <elopio> popey: I will tell him tomorrow to take a look.
[18:27] <popey> drop him a mail with the link, he'll probbaly see it quicker
[18:28] <konrad11901> elopio: do you maybe have permission to approve the docstrings task? It's been 72 hours since I submitted it for review :/
[18:28] <elopio> konrad11901: I don't know. Can you send me the link?
[18:28] <elopio> popey: will do
[18:29] <popey> going afk for a bit
[18:29] <popey> back later
[18:29] <konrad11901> elopio: https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/6562812467871744/
[18:33] <konrad11901> thanks elopio! :)
[18:33] <elopio> np
[18:35] <Accelerator> elopio: Mind looking at mine? https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/5319977328443392/?sp-page=2
[18:36] <elopio> Accelerator: looking...
[18:38] <elopio> Accelerator: replied. You can run the static tests locally, take a look at HACKING and TESTING docs. They all need to pass, before we can land your pull request
[18:39] <Accelerator> Alright thanks
[18:49] <kyrofa> Accelerator, done
[18:49] <Accelerator> kyrofa, Could i get an extension?
[18:52] <kyrofa> Accelerator, of course
[18:53] <Nissaar> https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/5373896733753344/
[18:53] <Nissaar> can someone review this please ?
[18:53] <Accelerator> kyrofa, Alright thanks
[18:53] <kyrofa> Accelerator, mind giving me a link to your task?
[18:53] <kyrofa> Accelerator, oh got it
[18:53] <kyrofa> nevermind
[18:54] <Nissaar> kyrofa:https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/task-instances/5373896733753344/ can please review this too ?
[18:56] <kyrofa> Nissaar, have you built the snap of the selected application and tested that it works as expected?
[18:56] <Nissaar> kyrofa: yes
[18:59] <kyrofa> flexiondotorg, popey how shall we review those tasks when the real product is the PR they make to upstream?
[19:02] <kyrofa> I sort of feel like we should be taking a snap for a test run
[19:03] <Nissaar> kyrofa: is there any problem with my task ?
[19:04] <kyrofa> Nissaar, not necessarily, I'm just not sure how to best review it
[19:04] <kyrofa> So I'm asking the folks who created the task what they had in mind
[19:05] <Nissaar> kyrofa: ahhh ok. its night at my place, im going to sleep. ill be wiating for the review. thanks
[19:05] <kyrofa> Nissaar, sounds good, sleep well!
[19:05] <Nissaar> popey: THANKS VERY MUCH FOR THE HELP
[19:05] <Nissaar> kyrofa: thanks mate
[20:09] <popey> Yay