[05:20] wallyworld: Please could you take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8285? [05:20] sure [05:22] babbageclunk: should the default exclude list contain several more read only methods out of the box? [05:38] babbageclunk: left some comments, happy to discuss [06:04] wallyworld: no, I don't think it should - I had a pretty big discussion with John about that in the last change. See discussion here: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8242#issuecomment-352670932 [06:04] (sorry, off doing dinner and bath time - will look at the comment s in a bit.) [06:06] ok [06:08] babbageclunk: his point was to audit all write methods by default and filter out read methods. but i don't think an opinion was offered as to the value in logging lots of read only methods which really don't reflect changes to the system [06:09] i can't see any point in recording that someone ran ListModels [06:09] why is that any more interesting that Status [06:09] do we have field input on this? [06:11] babbageclunk: i'll be in and out - got to start packing, so if i don't respnd straight away, it's not that i'm ignoring you :-) === frankban|afk is now known as frankban [09:19] morning [09:19] could I get a review of https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8262 ? [10:35] wallyworld_: The thinking isn't that ListModels is interesting, rather that it's pretty unlikely someone is running it so often that it would swamp the log (say, running it under watch). === frankban is now known as frankban|afk === agprado is now known as agprado|afk === agprado_ is now known as agprado