ricotz | hi, are the non-x86 builders in "hard freeze" or are there exceptions possible? | 08:09 |
---|---|---|
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
cjwatson | ricotz: Exceptions are possible, though I may well want to review diffs. | 11:04 |
ricotz | cjwatson, hi, I see, I currently have two packages which are | 11:05 |
ricotz | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-aurora/+sourcepub/8722307/+listing-archive-extra | 11:05 |
ricotz | https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/8721286/+listing-archive-extra | 11:06 |
ricotz | reviewing the diffs is a bit difficult :( | 11:06 |
cjwatson | I may have to pass on those for the time being. I have no realistic prospect of reviewing them. | 11:07 |
ricotz | alright | 11:07 |
ricotz | regarding the firefox beta it is the same as last week, just that is the first "tag" in the 59 cycle | 11:08 |
ricotz | is there an ETA for the non-x86 builders to be available again? | 11:10 |
* rbasak doesn't see an ETA in the topic. | 11:27 | |
cjwatson | I'd be extremely happy if we had an ETA | 11:27 |
cjwatson | AIUI blocked on kernels, basically | 11:28 |
acheronuk | AIUI? | 11:29 |
acheronuk | oh, gotcha. never mind | 11:30 |
ricotz | cjwatson, ok, I will try to be patient | 11:52 |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
juliank | cjwatson: You can start modifying launchpad to emit by-hash InRelease files now, support is coming shortly ;) PoC: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/master...julian-klode:inrelease-path?expand=1 | 12:57 |
cjwatson | juliank: Coo, thanks, that looks promising. So that'd be inrelease-path=by-hash/SHA256/... ? | 13:00 |
cjwatson | We'd still need to work out how that can sensibly be dispatched via livefs builds | 13:00 |
juliank | cjwatson: Yeah. Currently it falls back to Release and Release.gpg if it does not find that, I think I should disable that. | 13:00 |
acheronuk | cjwatson: does this ppa have a -ve score bonus? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/stable | 14:10 |
acheronuk | if so, could it be put back on parity with? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable | 14:12 |
cjwatson | They both have small negative scores; stable has -10, unstable has -1 | 14:13 |
cjwatson | Makes it less likely to swamp the build farm | 14:13 |
cjwatson | I've set stable to -1 | 14:13 |
acheronuk | cjwatson: yes, I get that was the idea. thanks, as at the moment it makes a lot of the 'stable' ones hit our CI timeout and go red as a fail on jenkins | 14:14 |
acheronuk | normally it was not much of a bother | 14:14 |
acheronuk | thank you | 14:15 |
cjwatson | np | 14:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!