[08:09] hi, are the non-x86 builders in "hard freeze" or are there exceptions possible? === maclin1 is now known as maclin [11:04] ricotz: Exceptions are possible, though I may well want to review diffs. [11:05] cjwatson, hi, I see, I currently have two packages which are [11:05] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-aurora/+sourcepub/8722307/+listing-archive-extra [11:06] https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/8721286/+listing-archive-extra [11:06] reviewing the diffs is a bit difficult :( [11:07] I may have to pass on those for the time being. I have no realistic prospect of reviewing them. [11:07] alright [11:08] regarding the firefox beta it is the same as last week, just that is the first "tag" in the 59 cycle [11:10] is there an ETA for the non-x86 builders to be available again? [11:27] * rbasak doesn't see an ETA in the topic. [11:27] I'd be extremely happy if we had an ETA [11:28] AIUI blocked on kernels, basically [11:29] AIUI? [11:30] oh, gotcha. never mind [11:52] cjwatson, ok, I will try to be patient === maclin1 is now known as maclin [12:57] cjwatson: You can start modifying launchpad to emit by-hash InRelease files now, support is coming shortly ;) PoC: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/master...julian-klode:inrelease-path?expand=1 [13:00] juliank: Coo, thanks, that looks promising. So that'd be inrelease-path=by-hash/SHA256/... ? [13:00] We'd still need to work out how that can sensibly be dispatched via livefs builds [13:00] cjwatson: Yeah. Currently it falls back to Release and Release.gpg if it does not find that, I think I should disable that. [14:10] cjwatson: does this ppa have a -ve score bonus? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/stable [14:12] if so, could it be put back on parity with? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable [14:13] They both have small negative scores; stable has -10, unstable has -1 [14:13] Makes it less likely to swamp the build farm [14:13] I've set stable to -1 [14:14] cjwatson: yes, I get that was the idea. thanks, as at the moment it makes a lot of the 'stable' ones hit our CI timeout and go red as a fail on jenkins [14:14] normally it was not much of a bother [14:15] thank you [14:16] np