[08:09] <ricotz> hi, are the non-x86 builders in "hard freeze" or are there exceptions possible?
[11:04] <cjwatson> ricotz: Exceptions are possible, though I may well want to review diffs.
[11:05] <ricotz> cjwatson, hi, I see, I currently have two packages which are
[11:05] <ricotz> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-aurora/+sourcepub/8722307/+listing-archive-extra
[11:06] <ricotz> https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/8721286/+listing-archive-extra
[11:06] <ricotz> reviewing the diffs is a bit difficult :(
[11:07] <cjwatson> I may have to pass on those for the time being.  I have no realistic prospect of reviewing them.
[11:07] <ricotz> alright
[11:08] <ricotz> regarding the firefox beta it is the same as last week, just that is the first "tag" in the 59 cycle
[11:10] <ricotz> is there an ETA for the non-x86 builders to be available again?
[11:27]  * rbasak doesn't see an ETA in the topic.
[11:27] <cjwatson> I'd be extremely happy if we had an ETA
[11:28] <cjwatson> AIUI blocked on kernels, basically
[11:29] <acheronuk> AIUI?
[11:30] <acheronuk> oh, gotcha. never mind
[11:52] <ricotz> cjwatson, ok, I will try to be patient
[12:57] <juliank> cjwatson: You can start modifying launchpad to emit by-hash InRelease files now, support is coming shortly ;)   PoC: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/master...julian-klode:inrelease-path?expand=1
[13:00] <cjwatson> juliank: Coo, thanks, that looks promising.  So that'd be inrelease-path=by-hash/SHA256/... ?
[13:00] <cjwatson> We'd still need to work out how that can sensibly be dispatched via livefs builds
[13:00] <juliank> cjwatson: Yeah. Currently it falls back to Release and Release.gpg if it does not find that, I think I should disable that.
[14:10] <acheronuk> cjwatson: does this ppa have a -ve score bonus? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/stable
[14:12] <acheronuk> if so, could it be put back on parity with? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable
[14:13] <cjwatson> They both have small negative scores; stable has -10, unstable has -1
[14:13] <cjwatson> Makes it less likely to swamp the build farm
[14:13] <cjwatson> I've set stable to -1
[14:14] <acheronuk> cjwatson: yes, I get that was the idea. thanks, as at the moment it makes a lot of the 'stable' ones hit our CI timeout and go red as a fail on jenkins
[14:14] <acheronuk> normally it was not much of a bother
[14:15] <acheronuk> thank you
[14:16] <cjwatson> np