| axw | babbageclunk: standup? | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| babbageclunk | oh sorry, omw | 00:02 |
| axw | agprado_: I wonder how many people they had off to the side ready to take that shark down :) | 00:18 |
| axw | seems a bit crazy to me | 00:18 |
| === agprado__ is now known as agprado | ||
| thumper | morning team | 05:35 |
| thumper | who is around? | 05:35 |
| blahdeblah | no one here but us testers! :-) | 05:36 |
| babbageclunk | thumper: I am around! | 05:36 |
| babbageclunk | also | 05:36 |
| babbageclunk | But I am a mere release automaton | 05:36 |
| thumper | babbageclunk: I hear there were some release issues | 05:37 |
| thumper | what is the current status? | 05:37 |
| babbageclunk | It's progressing apace - I'm just gpg signing a windows installer | 05:37 |
| babbageclunk | thumper: did the audit log demo go ok? | 05:39 |
| thumper | babbageclunk: it is this morning | 05:39 |
| babbageclunk | oh, timezones are confusing | 05:39 |
| thumper | what was the verify upgrade problem? | 05:39 |
| thumper | was it the proposed issue? | 05:40 |
| babbageclunk | yup | 05:40 |
| * thumper nods | 05:40 | |
| thumper | we should fix that | 05:40 |
| babbageclunk | yup | 05:40 |
| thumper | babbageclunk: quick audit log feedback | 05:49 |
| thumper | babbageclunk: for the "who" field, can we use the tag.Id() rather than the string value? | 05:49 |
| thumper | that would remove the user- prefix | 05:49 |
| thumper | given that we only record information from users | 05:49 |
| babbageclunk | Sure - I thought at the time that it was good future-proofing just in case, but it's really not needed is it. | 05:50 |
| thumper | babbageclunk: next question | 05:50 |
| thumper | how do you update the exclude methods? | 05:50 |
| thumper | given that it is an array? | 05:50 |
| babbageclunk | Well, at the moment there's no way to update it - updating controller config isn't landed yet. | 05:51 |
| babbageclunk | But I'd envisaged overwriting it each time. | 05:52 |
| thumper | but most of our other commands accept a single string value | 05:52 |
| babbageclunk | They accept a yaml value | 05:52 |
| thumper | will we read a yaml file? | 05:52 |
| babbageclunk | Oh you mean, what's the syntax to set it? | 05:52 |
| babbageclunk | audit-log-exclude-methods=[Facade.Method,Other.Method...] | 05:53 |
| thumper | yeah | 05:53 |
| thumper | I'm pretty sure there is a way to specify a file... | 05:53 |
| thumper | other places allow something-yaml=@filename.yaml | 05:53 |
| thumper | we should just look into that | 05:53 |
| thumper | because it is unlikely that they will want to put it all on the command line | 05:54 |
| babbageclunk | Not sure - I haven't changed how we specify it at all | 05:54 |
| babbageclunk | If we accept that for other config that'll work | 05:55 |
| thumper | I'm also wondering whether we should exclude error responses if all the errors are nil | 05:55 |
| * thumper nods | 05:55 | |
| thumper | but I'll gather feedback at the demo today | 05:55 |
| thumper | and let you know | 05:55 |
| babbageclunk | My thinking there is that we could have specified a number of things, it's useful to know which ones failed. | 05:55 |
| babbageclunk | (in a bulk operation) | 05:56 |
| thumper | sure, but it none failed, should we write something out? | 05:56 |
| thumper | I agree that showing which of the bulk failed is good | 05:56 |
| thumper | but if the command succeeds completely, it is a "boring" line | 05:56 |
| thumper | don't stress about it just yet | 05:56 |
| thumper | I'll get feedback | 05:56 |
| babbageclunk | I don't really like omitting the message if there's no errors - makes it hard to distinguish between a success and a truncated file. | 05:57 |
| babbageclunk | But no biggie | 05:57 |
| thumper | sure | 05:58 |
| thumper | sounds reasonable | 05:58 |
| axw | babbageclunk: your email did go through, in case you're still wondering | 07:11 |
| babbageclunk | cool thanks - I was | 07:11 |
| babbageclunk | anastasiamac only gets them after my bedtime so she couldn't help | 07:11 |
| anastasiamac | babbageclunk: :( i helped a little... but thank you, axw :D | 07:15 |
| babbageclunk | Oh, sorry anastasiamac - you were very helpful for other stuff but not for that specific delivery question! | 07:16 |
| anastasiamac | babbageclunk: :) | 07:16 |
| axw | wallyworld: I'm reviewing your PR from the beginning again, given all the new context. thanks for your patience | 07:19 |
| freyes | hi, in the devel stream there is no entry for juju 2.4 -> https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.json | 16:11 |
| === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose | ||
| kjackal | hi, we run into some trouble when bootstraping a controller on openstack. We get an error "failed to get details for serverId" follwoed by a "Authentication responce not recieved..." | 17:24 |
| kjackal | how can we approach this? | 17:25 |
| kjackal | seems it comes from openstack provider.go:1366 | 17:26 |
| hml | babbageclunk: ping | 21:53 |
| babbageclunk | hml: hey hey | 21:54 |
| hml | babbageclunk: do you have a few minutes? | 21:54 |
| babbageclunk | sure | 21:54 |
| babbageclunk | on a hangout? | 21:54 |
| hml | babbageclunk: standup HO? | 21:54 |
| hml | :-) | 21:54 |
| * babbageclunk pauses the sea shanties | 21:54 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!