[00:01] babbageclunk: standup? [00:02] oh sorry, omw [00:18] agprado_: I wonder how many people they had off to the side ready to take that shark down :) [00:18] seems a bit crazy to me === agprado__ is now known as agprado [05:35] morning team [05:35] who is around? [05:36] no one here but us testers! :-) [05:36] thumper: I am around! [05:36] also [05:36] But I am a mere release automaton [05:37] babbageclunk: I hear there were some release issues [05:37] what is the current status? [05:37] It's progressing apace - I'm just gpg signing a windows installer [05:39] thumper: did the audit log demo go ok? [05:39] babbageclunk: it is this morning [05:39] oh, timezones are confusing [05:39] what was the verify upgrade problem? [05:40] was it the proposed issue? [05:40] yup [05:40] * thumper nods [05:40] we should fix that [05:40] yup [05:49] babbageclunk: quick audit log feedback [05:49] babbageclunk: for the "who" field, can we use the tag.Id() rather than the string value? [05:49] that would remove the user- prefix [05:49] given that we only record information from users [05:50] Sure - I thought at the time that it was good future-proofing just in case, but it's really not needed is it. [05:50] babbageclunk: next question [05:50] how do you update the exclude methods? [05:50] given that it is an array? [05:51] Well, at the moment there's no way to update it - updating controller config isn't landed yet. [05:52] But I'd envisaged overwriting it each time. [05:52] but most of our other commands accept a single string value [05:52] They accept a yaml value [05:52] will we read a yaml file? [05:52] Oh you mean, what's the syntax to set it? [05:53] audit-log-exclude-methods=[Facade.Method,Other.Method...] [05:53] yeah [05:53] I'm pretty sure there is a way to specify a file... [05:53] other places allow something-yaml=@filename.yaml [05:53] we should just look into that [05:54] because it is unlikely that they will want to put it all on the command line [05:54] Not sure - I haven't changed how we specify it at all [05:55] If we accept that for other config that'll work [05:55] I'm also wondering whether we should exclude error responses if all the errors are nil [05:55] * thumper nods [05:55] but I'll gather feedback at the demo today [05:55] and let you know [05:55] My thinking there is that we could have specified a number of things, it's useful to know which ones failed. [05:56] (in a bulk operation) [05:56] sure, but it none failed, should we write something out? [05:56] I agree that showing which of the bulk failed is good [05:56] but if the command succeeds completely, it is a "boring" line [05:56] don't stress about it just yet [05:56] I'll get feedback [05:57] I don't really like omitting the message if there's no errors - makes it hard to distinguish between a success and a truncated file. [05:57] But no biggie [05:58] sure [05:58] sounds reasonable [07:11] babbageclunk: your email did go through, in case you're still wondering [07:11] cool thanks - I was [07:11] anastasiamac only gets them after my bedtime so she couldn't help [07:15] babbageclunk: :( i helped a little... but thank you, axw :D [07:16] Oh, sorry anastasiamac - you were very helpful for other stuff but not for that specific delivery question! [07:16] babbageclunk: :) [07:19] wallyworld: I'm reviewing your PR from the beginning again, given all the new context. thanks for your patience [16:11] hi, in the devel stream there is no entry for juju 2.4 -> https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.json === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose [17:24] hi, we run into some trouble when bootstraping a controller on openstack. We get an error "failed to get details for serverId" follwoed by a "Authentication responce not recieved..." [17:25] how can we approach this? [17:26] seems it comes from openstack provider.go:1366 [21:53] babbageclunk: ping [21:54] hml: hey hey [21:54] babbageclunk: do you have a few minutes? [21:54] sure [21:54] on a hangout? [21:54] babbageclunk: standup HO? [21:54] :-) [21:54] * babbageclunk pauses the sea shanties