=== jauftpwjldzlykuc is now known as skcljciynsrbrheb === skcljciynsrbrheb is now known as LordOfBikes [17:08] hi, is there any reason why the eclipse package is still in version 3.8 and accordingly 6 years old? [17:09] You mean besides noone investing the time to work on it? [17:09] exactly [17:11] seems like a very long time. so there could be a another reason apart from the usual [17:11] From what I understood there were changes to it that made it harder to package, and it's java. But I never digged deeper into it, and when I asked only frustration came back from the people that tried to work on it. [17:13] i understand, java indeed is ugly [17:13] this is the first package i came across in ubuntu, which is really that old [17:16] is there a list of packages with their respective age in universe? [21:32] Perhaps Debian 681726. [21:32] Debian bug 681726 in src:eclipse "eclipse: Upgrade to latest upstream release (HELP WANTED)" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/681726