 http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/
[13:43] <ahayzen> :-D
[13:44] <ahayzen> Any idea what version you plan to have in the LTS image? 5.9.5 is planned for end of March...
 No idea yet, probably 5.9.4
[13:47] <ahayzen> Cool, probably the safer option. Will you be updating with the point releases/SRUs? Eg 5.9.5 ship with 18.04.1 ?
 We would like to, but the problem is that all code built against 5.9.x and using QObjectPrivate/QWidgetPrivate will break with 5.9.x+1
 Maybe we should ask upstream to relax the version check once 5.9 enters ‘Strict’ mode.
[13:50] <ahayzen> ugh yeah :-/
 This is something worth discussing on upstream mailing list
[13:53] <ahayzen> yeah definitely
 @mitya57, I can start packaging this later if that's OK?
 @mitya57, Yeah, wanna start that discussion upstream or should I?
 @tsimonq2, Please start, maybe it would be better to use a PPA this time
 @tsimonq2, I can do it, but not today. If you want to start it, here is the check I refer to: http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/kernel/qobject.cpp#n214
 @mitya57, Would CI Train work?
 @mitya57, Ok
 @tsimonq2, Yes, CI Train is what I meant
[14:11] <lubot1> * mitya57 notices that currently qtbase is uninstallable because pcre2 is in universe
[14:11] <lubot1> * mitya57
 It is quite a small package and does not have any dependencies, so I guess I will file a MIR
 @mitya57, Ok
 Oh, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre2/+bug/1636666
[14:19] <lubot1> * mitya57 comments on the bug
[14:37] <lubot1> DanChapman was added by: DanChapman
 Welcome!
 Thanks 😁