[13:43] http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/ [13:43] :-D [13:44] Any idea what version you plan to have in the LTS image? 5.9.5 is planned for end of March... [13:46] No idea yet, probably 5.9.4 [13:47] Cool, probably the safer option. Will you be updating with the point releases/SRUs? Eg 5.9.5 ship with 18.04.1 ? [13:49] We would like to, but the problem is that all code built against 5.9.x and using QObjectPrivate/QWidgetPrivate will break with 5.9.x+1 [13:50] Maybe we should ask upstream to relax the version check once 5.9 enters ‘Strict’ mode. [13:50] ugh yeah :-/ [13:50] This is something worth discussing on upstream mailing list [13:53] yeah definitely [14:01] @mitya57, I can start packaging this later if that's OK? [14:01] @mitya57, Yeah, wanna start that discussion upstream or should I? [14:02] @tsimonq2, Please start, maybe it would be better to use a PPA this time [14:03] @tsimonq2, I can do it, but not today. If you want to start it, here is the check I refer to: http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/kernel/qobject.cpp#n214 [14:05] @mitya57, Would CI Train work? [14:05] @mitya57, Ok [14:06] @tsimonq2, Yes, CI Train is what I meant [14:11] * mitya57 notices that currently qtbase is uninstallable because pcre2 is in universe [14:11] * mitya57 [14:14] It is quite a small package and does not have any dependencies, so I guess I will file a MIR [14:15] @mitya57, Ok [14:17] Oh, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre2/+bug/1636666 [14:17] Launchpad bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,Incomplete] [14:19] * mitya57 comments on the bug [14:37] DanChapman was added by: DanChapman [14:40] Welcome! [14:50] Thanks 😁