[00:47] babbageclunk: sorry! cut you off [00:55] babbageclunk: exciting! [00:56] wallyworld: No worries! [00:56] I don't think it was anything exciting. [00:57] veebers: i know right! [01:01] babbageclunk: hopefully everything was in order [01:02] veebers: yup, it looked better than I remembered it! [01:05] that's a good sign! === akhavr1 is now known as akhavr === akhavr1 is now known as akhavr [06:35] axw: should i hold off reviewing the raft cluster pr pending changes to use the (single) address as the node id? I think that's what we agreed right? [06:37] wallyworld: yeah, and the rafttransport PR I guess [06:37] yep [06:40] wallyworld: thanks for the review. can you please see my reply before I merge [06:40] sure [06:41] axw: ok, no worries, lgtm [06:41] thanks === akhavr1 is now known as akhavr === Guest34686 is now known as manadart === rogpeppe1 is now known as rogpeppe === rogpeppe1 is now known as rogpeppe === frankban is now known as frankban|afk === frankban|afk is now known as frankban [16:56] hml, do you know who is working on retooling backup / restore (if anyone?)? [19:16] vern, I'm still not sure who's working backup / restore fixes, if anyone atm fyi [19:17] hml was doing some work on backup/restore. not sure if it was just bug-fixes [19:18] vern: agprado and i are going to take a look at back/restore shortly - some bug fixes but review overall [19:18] vern: is there somewhere we need to look? [19:19] hml: I'm going to write/extend the qa test. want to be sure to have a good plan and to anticipate anything that isn't working right [19:20] vern: okay - i’ll have more info next week [19:36] hml, specifically I think the plan was to simplify things right? Or will you focus on bugfixes? [19:38] balloons: yes - simplify if we can and try to improve the experience [19:47] vern, try and prep your thoughts on the existing state of the test for standup if you could. [19:48] will do [22:51] anastasiamac: hiya! thanks for working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1745231 so quickly! I just sent a reply to that issue. [22:51] Bug #1745231: removed model can cause allmodelwatcher to die permanently [22:58] rogpeppe1: nws - thnx for looking into it :) [22:58] anastasiamac: it's been bugging us for ages! [22:59] anastasiamac: luckily the last time it happened i got them to set the logging level to INFO [22:59] anastasiamac: so i finally saw the problem [22:59] rogpeppe1: yeah, it has been a hard road... m glad u were patient and insightful [23:00] anastasiamac: BTW i think it would be nice if more places that logged errors logged the error details too [23:00] anastasiamac: np, it was useful to have got there in the end :) [23:01] anastasiamac: to get a timely notification when the problem started happening i built a nice prometheus-monitoring tool that shows "jimm: ok" at the top of my screen (in the indicator bar). [23:01] anastasiamac: i'm sure i can do more interesting things with that :) [23:02] rogpeppe1: that sounds amazing \o/ anything that can be shared with us so that we can keep an eye on it too? [23:03] anastasiamac: well, indicator-sysmonitor makes it easy to put custom stuff on the indicator panel [23:04] anastasiamac: and the little localhost server to monitor prometheus is this code: http://paste.ubuntu.com/26454773/ [23:05] rogpeppe1: niiice [23:05] anastasiamac: then the script called by indicator-sysmonitor is just (more-or-less) bhttp http://localhost:12468/status [23:10] rogpeppe1: thnx !