[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.14.22+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cherrypy3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [8.9.1-2]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.22+dfsg-1]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.22+dfsg-1]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.22+dfsg-1]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.22+dfsg-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.14.22+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:54] <handsome_feng> Hi, Could someone in archive admins team help to review the ukui-menus in bionic upload queue? Thanks!
[01:01] <tsimonq2> +1
[01:09] <jbicha> handsome_feng: why haven't you tried uploading it to Debian like the other UKUI packages?
[01:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-django-celery-results [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[01:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-django-celery-beat [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-django-celery-beat [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.14.22+dfsg-1]
[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-django-celery-results [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[04:41] <tsimonq2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1745084
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtklib [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtklib [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtklib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtklib [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtklib [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtklib [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[06:23] <handsome_feng> jbicha: Sorry for the late reply. because I was told that uploading a new package to Debian may take a long time. We might miss the Debian Import Freeze day. :/
[06:48] <ginggs> handsome_feng: Debian Import Freeze is for automatic freezes, packages can still be imported manually
[06:48] <ginggs> s/automatic freezes/automatic syncs/
[06:51] <handsome_feng> ginggs: Got it, thanks! Since we are focus on ubuntu, I will uploading packages to Debian first next time. :)
[06:55] <cpaelzer> Hi, not sure what else than pinging I'm supposed to do to get an ack/nack on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2017-December/004255.html
[06:56] <cpaelzer> According to the doc "This can be done to any individual member of the SRU team directly, or you can send it to ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com for review."
[06:56] <cpaelzer> so if any one would find the time to look into it, that would be nice to have it in place for 18.04
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtklib [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1]
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtklib [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1]
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtklib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1]
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtklib [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1]
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtklib [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1]
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtklib [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3+dfsg1-1]
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (artful-proposed/main) [3.4.1-7 => 3.4.1-7ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[09:31] <cpaelzer> Hi, I killed the last dependencies to dpdk 17.05 in bionic
[09:32] <cpaelzer> is there anything I need to do to clean up the old binaries?
[09:41] <cpaelzer> another thing on proposed migration - latest open-vm-tools dropped a binary (intentionally)
[09:42] <cpaelzer> but now I see it hanging just for said binary in update_excuses
[09:42] <cpaelzer> missing build on arm64: open-vm-tools-dkms (from 2:10.1.15-1build1)
[09:42] <cpaelzer> we want it to be gone, why is this blocking the migration
[09:42] <cpaelzer> sorry for my lack of knowledge on this detail of the migrations :-/
[09:42]  * cpaelzer feels bad
[09:43] <apw> cpaelzer, is dpdk 17.05 and later version in different source packages, if so i think we need a removal-request bug for the old one if it is dead; if it is just an older library version sort of thing, NBS processing will find it
[09:44] <apw> cpaelzer, if you removed a binary, then i believe britney will be waiting on it unless it is helped
[09:45] <cpaelzer> apw: no - same source package
[09:45] <cpaelzer> just the bianries are versioned
[09:45] <apw> cpaelzer, got an example of a binary name that is dead, so i can check it is on the list
[09:45] <cpaelzer> ok then NBS will catch it for the first request
[09:45] <cpaelzer> yeah just a sec
[09:45] <apw> i beliebe it may already be asking me to remove them :)
[09:46] <cpaelzer> librte-ethdev17.05
[09:46] <cpaelzer> is one binary that should (tm) have no dep anymore
[09:46] <apw> yep, that is on the list, so those will indeed be handled "naturally"
[09:46] <cpaelzer> great
[09:46] <cpaelzer> apw: and on the second case - what do you mean with "unless it is helped" ?
[09:47] <apw> cpaelzer, am looking to see about the second one now
[09:47] <cpaelzer> do we need a bug or other thing to ack on the removal of the binary
[09:47] <cpaelzer> ok, waiting for what you find
[09:48] <cpaelzer> btw - it is a dkms module not maintained since 2008 or so, which means dropping is the only right thing to do
[09:48] <cpaelzer> and for the sake of the kernel teams favor - that dkms broke 4.15 autopkgtests so I had Debian remove it "for you" essentially :-)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected orca [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.0-4ubuntu1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orca [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.0-5ubuntu1]
[09:49] <apw> cpaelzer, ok in this case it is because you have removed a package which is actually seeded
[09:49] <apw> doh ignore that, i missed
[09:49] <cpaelzer> ok, but now really waiting to hear what you see on "open-vm-tools-dkms"
[09:49] <cpaelzer> the dmks is not
[09:49] <cpaelzer> only the base tools
[09:49] <apw> indeed, i missed, ignore that
[09:51] <apw> ahh it is an _all, ok iirc this is a case where britney cannot tell it can allow this, so it has to be helped
[09:51] <cpaelzer> do you need anything from me to "help it" ?
[09:53] <apw> cpaelzer, nope will get my wet kipper out and do some wacking
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orca [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.26.0-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orca [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.0-5ubuntu1]
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-backend-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-backend-cups [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1018.19] (kernel)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1018.19]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpdb-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-cups [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-cups [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-cups [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-cups [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-cups [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-cups [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.6.1-1ubuntu2.1]
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openbox [source] (trusty-proposed) [3.5.2-6ubuntu0.1]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5.6-2ubuntu1]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (artful-proposed) [0.5.8-1ubuntu2]
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spamassassin [source] (artful-proposed) [3.4.1-7ubuntu1]
[13:47] <sil2100> Laney: hey! Is request.cgi re-enabled? Or not yet?
[13:47] <Laney> sil2100: not yet, trying to get all the arches working first
[13:48] <sil2100> Laney: ok, thanks :)
[14:19] <tsimonq2> Hi! Could I please get eyes on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1745084 ? I'd really like lubuntu-meta to migrate :)
[14:25]  * didrocks flushes
[14:25] <didrocks> tsimonq2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1745084/comments/1
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.17.6]
[15:13] <tsimonq2> didrocks: Thank you! :)
[15:19] <didrocks> yw ;)
[15:20] <ahasenack> hi, ocfs2-tools autopkgtest won't work on s390x (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/ocfs2-tools/bionic/s390x) until upstream fixes https://github.com/markfasheh/ocfs2-tools/issues/22
[15:21] <ahasenack> what's the best course of action here: skip those test, or change the package so that the specific test that is core dumping is skipped?
[16:27] <Laney> ahasenack: the comment in the PR sounds like indicates it doesn't work on big endian arches, is that right?
[16:28] <Laney> If so, might want to consider not building this package there
[16:28] <ahasenack> Laney: the comment does seem to indicate a lot of changes are needed
[16:29] <ahasenack> xnox: do you have more context? ^
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-112.135~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-gcp [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-gcp [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-gcp [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-gcp [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpdb-backend-gcp [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-112.135~14.04.1]
[17:12] <wolsen> any chance to promote https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networking-l2gw/+bug/1737040 for artful?
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-pretty-bytes [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[17:40] <nacc> Laney: (sorry if I missed it) is request.cgi being re-enabled soon-ish?
[17:41] <nacc> infinity: it would appear src:phpunit-mock-object and src:phpunit need to build together, can you work some AA magic on that?
[17:44] <Laney> nacc: Yeah, I'll probably put it back on tomorrow if everything looks OK.
[17:46] <nacc> Laney: thanks!
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (xenial-proposed/main) [1.78ubuntu5 => 1.78ubuntu6] (core)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (trusty-proposed/main) [1.69ubuntu1.3 => 1.69ubuntu1.4] (core)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intltool (artful-proposed/main) [0.51.0-4 => 0.51.0-4ubuntu1.17.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intltool (xenial-proposed/main) [0.51.0-2 => 0.51.0-2ubuntu1.16.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-radix [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-radix [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-radix [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-radix [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-radix [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-radix [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: scour [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.36-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-isomorphic-fetch [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wcstools [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.9.5-2] (no packageset)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-backports.tempfile [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-backports.weakref [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1] (no packageset)