[00:09] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Can I please get Binary NEW reviews of libdbusmenu-qt and kdeclarative?
[00:51] <cjwatson> I did libdbusmenu-qt, but only because it was trivial with new-binary-debian-universe
[00:52] <cjwatson> not doing kdeclarative (at the moment, anyway)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted check-manifest [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.36-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-gui [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-gui [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-gui [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdbusmenu-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdbusmenu-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdbusmenu-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-gui [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-gui [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdbusmenu-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-plotly [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.7.1+dfsg-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-gui [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdbusmenu-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdbusmenu-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1]
[00:57] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: Thanks.
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-back [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2] (no packageset)
[01:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-back [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2] (no packageset)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-back [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2] (no packageset)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-back [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2] (no packageset)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-back [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2] (no packageset)
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-back [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2] (no packageset)
[04:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qca2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.1.3-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freefem [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freefem [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freefem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freefem [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freefem [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freefem [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:27] <tsimonq2> freefem Binary NEW is library v5 rename, cleanup from the GCC 5 transition
[07:13] <tsimonq2> So acheronuk reminded me about the Alpha, and I'm thinking about just skipping Alpha 2 altogether.
[07:14] <tsimonq2> Lubuntu isn't ready, we have some pending changes going on, Kubuntu is in the middle of a Frameworks transition that wouldn't land in time, Ubuntu Kylin has some packages they need to get in that a MOTU (likely me) won't get to in the next 24 hours, Ubuntu MATE said no, Xubuntu doesn't do milestones, Ubuntu Budgie said yes so I'll have to talk to them... am I forgetting about anyone?
[07:14] <tsimonq2> s/won't get to/likely won't get ti/
[07:16] <acheronuk> considering that Kubuntu is also waiting for not just frameworks, but the whole new plasma LTS stack out on 6th Feb, plus a new full applications release, an Alpha2 would not represent anything like what we intend to ship anyway
[07:16] <tsimonq2> Right.
[07:17] <acheronuk> we could always name a days daily iso mid feb, and have a community iso test days, or something, if we really want it
[07:17] <tsimonq2> I might be down for that
[07:18] <tsimonq2> Depends on how things work out for Lubuntu
[07:18] <tsimonq2> (And will likely be the same for Kubuntu, depending on how things work out...)
[07:18] <acheronuk> ditto. just a though
[07:18] <acheronuk> *thought
[07:18] <tsimonq2> right
[07:19] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: If you see sil2100 before me on Monday, I know he signed up to do Nusakan for Alpha 2
[07:21] <acheronuk> ok, can do
[07:24] <valorie> ooo, one more alpha we don't have to do
[07:25] <valorie> an daily ISO test day would be cool though
[07:28] <flocculant> tsimonq2: xubuntu does do milestones - we just don't do Alpha's ;)
[07:28] <tsimonq2> flocculant: bah, whatever ;)
[07:29] <valorie> I think kubuntu skips them often because of KDE release calendars
[07:29] <flocculant> acheronuk: a community iso test day might be something useful - could arrange it at https://community.ubuntu.com easily enough, bear in mind that all the iso's build at different times
[07:31] <acheronuk> the previous 2 days builds are kept on a dated folder, so could name one of those if there is lag between flavours
[07:31] <acheronuk> but yes, a detail to work out
[07:33] <flocculant> acheronuk: the detail of the build times > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/mainline/view/head:/etc/crontab
[07:33] <flocculant> anyway - useful idea :)
[07:34] <tsimonq2> I think a few weeks ago slangasek said something similar, I would be interested to hear what he has to say on it :)
[07:34] <acheronuk> flocculant: ty
[07:34] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: yeah, I think he did
[07:42] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/01/04/%23ubuntu-release.html#t21:47
[07:42] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: human grep :P
[07:43] <acheronuk> no, grep is grep. literally :P
[07:44] <flocculant> tsimonq2 acheronuk - looks like the 3 flavours who build a goof while after the rest are Lubuntu, Kylin and Studio - Studio are likely to not even notice it happening, Kylin rarely get involved in setting things up
[07:45] <flocculant> so just 1 flavour who might care to join in :D
[07:45] <flocculant> that flavour might perhaps think about building earlier in the day in the future :p
[07:46] <flocculant> I moved our's a few cycles ago to make it easier for Xubuntu
[07:46] <valorie> might be good to have a few people contact Studio
[07:46] <valorie> unless we want to let it die
[07:46] <valorie> :(
[07:46] <flocculant> valorie: I've tried
[07:47] <valorie> maybe it's too late
[07:47] <flocculant> also they're quite close to Xubuntu as they use Xfce - I'm not the only one to have tried
[07:47] <valorie> what happens to their packageset if they die?
[07:47] <flocculant> not a clue
[07:48] <tsimonq2> Eventually it gets abandoned or removed.
[07:48] <valorie> yeah, that's what I thought
[07:48] <valorie> that would be sad
[07:49] <valorie> quite a few people use it with their TVs, etc.
[07:51] <flocculant> do they? I thought that was mythbuntu?
[07:52] <lotuspsychje> mythbuntu is abandoned no?
[07:52] <flocculant> yea
[07:52] <lotuspsychje> thought so
[07:53] <valorie> uh, yeah -- production, not display, sorry
[07:53] <acheronuk> too easy to grab another flavour and add what creator tools you want now I suppose. less need a bundled iso for it
[07:53] <valorie> true
[07:53] <valorie> nobody but them likes jack though
[07:53] <valorie> lol
[07:54] <flocculant> :)
[07:54] <acheronuk> maybe there could be studio meta packages retained/redone, so that you can 'studio up' each flavour?
[07:55]  * valorie volunteers acheronuk to do that wonderful work!
[07:55]  * acheronuk hides
[07:55] <flocculant> well it's not dead yet - just appears so to us ;)
[07:55] <acheronuk> of course. just think out loud
[07:56] <acheronuk> *thinking
[08:25] <flocculant> :)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-back [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-back [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-back [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-back [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-back [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-back [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-2]
[12:02] <acheronuk> .
[12:03] <acheronuk> hi, can kdeclarative new binary be reviewed please if someone can spare the time? that is blocking the rest of frameworks building. thanks
[12:29] <cjwatson> acheronuk: done
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdeclarative [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.42.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdeclarative [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [5.42.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdeclarative [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.42.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdeclarative [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.42.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdeclarative [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.42.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdeclarative [i386] (bionic-proposed) [5.42.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:30] <acheronuk> cjwatson: thank you very much :)
[17:34] <tsimonq2> Hello, could I please get a Binary NEW review of freefem?
[17:53] <tsimonq2> I miscalculated things... could a kind soul please RM kde-baseapps from bionic-proposed?
[18:59] <flocculant> infinity: re the non-booting 32 bit iso issue I appear to have, I managed to get a vid of the boot with some info - if it's any use I don't know ;)
[18:59] <flocculant> bug 1744357
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-epgsync [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.1.2+git20180128-1] (no packageset)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-epgsync [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-epgsync [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2+git20180128-1] (no packageset)
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-epgsync [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2+git20180128-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2+git20180128-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] <wgrant> flocculant: That's a kernel bug that I tracked down on Friday. Affects hardware with an IOMMU, and only on our 4.13 i386 with Meltdown fix. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1745118
[23:24]  * wgrant dupes
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-epgsync [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-epgsync [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2+git20180128-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2+git20180128-1] (no packageset)