tsimonq2slangasek: ukui-menus is incoming to Bionic source NEW and should have the copyright changes you requested, could you please take a look?02:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ukui-menus (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1]02:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-osdteletext [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)05:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-osdteletext [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)05:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-osdteletext [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)05:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-osdteletext [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)05:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: menu-cache (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu0.1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)05:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxpanel (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1ubuntu2 => 0.8.2-1ubuntu2.1] (lubuntu)05:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-osdteletext [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)05:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vdr-plugin-osdteletext [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)05:48
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
flocculantwgrant: awesome - thanks for lettimg me know05:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qttools-opensource-src (xenial-proposed/universe) [5.5.1-3build1 => 5.5.1-3ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu, qt5)06:23
juliankApparently we either need to MIR sanlock or demote lvm2-lockd to universe.08:35
juliankotherwise lvm2 is stuck08:36
jibelsil2100, hi, alpha 2 is still planned this week?09:44
sil2100jibel: hey! I think you need to ask tsimonq2 ;)09:54
sil2100I didn't hear anything from him yet, I'm just the image engineer for this milestone09:54
acheronuksil2100: see yesterdays log from here09:55
acheronuksil2100: and that fulfils my promise from 07:19 in that log ;)09:57
sil2100acheronuk: thanks for the info then ;)09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cysignals [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.6+ds-3] (no packageset)11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cysignals [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.6+ds-3] (no packageset)11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 1.4.0-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 (xenial-proposed/main) [1:7.9.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 1:7.10.0-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cysignals [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.6+ds-3] (no packageset)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cysignals [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.6+ds-3] (no packageset)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.0.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 1:1.0.15-2~16.04.1] (no packageset)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cysignals [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.6+ds-3] (no packageset)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cysignals [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.6+ds-3] (no packageset)11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-fan (artful-proposed/main) [0.12.8~17.10.1 => 0.12.9~17.10.1] (no packageset)11:59
handsome_fengHi, I'm the member of Ubuntu Kylin, we know that Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Will Likely Ship With Linux 4.15, but is it possible to choose kernel 4.14 for ubuntukylin 18.04? If it's possible, how to archive that?13:41
jbichahandsome_feng: why?13:53
handsome_fengjbicha:emmm, it's just a idea that not decide yet, and we just want to know is that possible, :)13:58
jbichahandsome_feng: I am not a Kernel Team member or Release Team but the short answer is "no"13:59
jbichaCanonical will support 4.15 for the normal life of Ubuntu 18.04 LTS14:00
handsome_fengjbicha: Fine, Got it, thanks!14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cysignals [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.6+ds-3]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cysignals [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.6+ds-3]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cysignals [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.6+ds-3]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-osdteletext [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-osdteletext [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-osdteletext [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cysignals [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.6+ds-3]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cysignals [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.6+ds-3]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-osdteletext [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cysignals [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.6+ds-3]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-osdteletext [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-osdteletext [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1]14:01
jbichaif you're thinking that 4.14 is better because it's LTS, note that it's not scheduled to be an extended LTS like 4.4 is14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freefem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freefem [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freefem [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2+git20180128-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2+git20180128-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2+git20180128-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freefem [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freefem [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2+git20180128-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freefem [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.8-6ubuntu1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2+git20180128-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-skinenigmang [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2+git20180128-1]14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qca2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.3-2ubuntu1]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-epgsync [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-3]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-epgsync [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-3]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-epgsync [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-3]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-epgsync [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-3]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-epgsync [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-3]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vdr-plugin-epgsync [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-3]14:02
handsome_fengjbicha: Thank you for your information!14:04
jbichahandsome_feng: there was talk about skipping Bionic Alpha 214:07
handsome_fengjbicha: Thanks, after a discuss with other members, kylin will join in alpha2.14:20
jbichahandsome_feng: did you read the discussion link I just posted?14:21
handsome_fengemm, part of them, Did I miss something?14:22
jbichait sounds like it might only be you and Budgie in Alpha214:22
jbichaI don't think it makes sense to do an Alpha for only one flavor IMO (but I'm not in charge of that)14:22
jbichawill you handle the release work, sending out the announcements and other coordination?14:23
handsome_fengemm, Do you mean the release note and iso testing for ubuntu kylin?14:26
jbichaI mean are you going to send out the ubuntu-devel-announce email for all participating flavors14:27
jbichaare you going to stay in this channel at least during release week?14:27
jbichaare you going to coordinate with other participating flavors so that rebuilds and the release happen smoothly?14:28
handsome_fengsorry, I don't think I am good enough for the job...14:29
jbichaif I remember correctly, I don't think Ubuntu Budgie has done that job either14:30
jbichathere are people here that can teach you and help you with that if you want to commit to doing it for Alpha 214:30
jbichabut it needs to be either you or Ubuntu Budgie (fossfreedom probably) to do that work for there to be an Alpha 214:31
handsome_fengDoes this have a wiki page? I'm worried about my bad English and I have no experience.14:35
handsome_fengjbicha: Considering that I'm not good enough and the time different, We decide skipping alpha2 too, sorry.14:42
jbichahandsome_feng: I recommend you follow up with Ubuntu Budgie14:44
handsome_fengFine, We will follow up with Budgie, if they do the release job, we will join in(and learning how to do the release job), and if not, we will skipping too.14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (artful-proposed) [17.2.8-0ubuntu0~17.10.1]15:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (artful-proposed/main) [17.2.4-0ubuntu1~17.10.2 => 17.2.8-0ubuntu0~17.10.1] (core, xorg)15:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.2.8-0ubuntu0~16.04.1]15:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (xenial-proposed/main) [17.2.4-0ubuntu1~16.04.4 => 17.2.8-0ubuntu0~16.04.1] (core, xorg)15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (artful-proposed/main) [3.5-1~ubuntu17.10.1 => 3.5-1~ubuntu17.10.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (xenial-proposed/main) [3.5-1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 3.5-1~ubuntu16.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (trusty-proposed/main) [3.5-1~ubuntu14.04.1 => 3.5-1~ubuntu14.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)15:40
slangasekLaney: all of the autopkgtest queues seem to be draining faster today; did you do anything?16:43
Laneyslangasek: cleaned up ports on bos02, but otherwise nothing in particular16:45
Laneythat might have been why bos02 was slower16:49
slangasekLaney: when I checked in over the weekend (but had no time to follow through), I was seeing s390x test runners consistently failing16:49
slangasekwhich wouldn't be the port thing, since that would be architecture-agnostic16:50
LaneyI started a test instance and it failed to allocate a neutron port16:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (artful-proposed/main) [2.11.0-2ubuntu17 => 2.11.0-2ubuntu17.1] (core)17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (xenial-proposed/main) [2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 => 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.8] (core)17:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (trusty-proposed/main) [2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.1 => 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.2] (core)17:30
tsimonq2slangasek: Can kde-baseapps please get an RM from bionic-proposed? I miscalculated things...17:43
tsimonq2(tl;dr it should be removed from bionic once all rdeps are ported, or they should go with it, KDE 4...)17:44
slangasektsimonq2: sorry, what was the miscalculation?17:46
tsimonq2slangasek: autopkgtests are rightfully broken because of version mismatches. I could go and monkey patch the incompatibilities but it seems to be better to just RM17:48
slangasektsimonq2: this appears to have been a sync of a package still present in Debian; do you expect it to be removed there?17:49
tsimonq2slangasek: Eventually it will be removed in Debian because of the KDE 4 deprecation but not at the moment.17:49
slangasektsimonq2: ok17:50
tsimonq2slangasek: So I'm just suggesting to remove from -proposed and keep with the 16.04.3 version already in Bionic.17:50
tsimonq2slangasek: Because it's not worth the effort to fix it if it's deprecated upstream and will be RMed anyways17:51
tsimonq2slangasek: btw, did you get a chance to look at ukui-menus? It should be good now.17:52
slangasekand I see someone is spiking the autopkgtest queue again... I assume that's more KDE17:52
tsimonq2Not likely17:52
slangasektsimonq2: not yet; I'm a bit under the weather and working at half capacity today, which basically means I'm keeping up with meetings and little else17:53
tsimonq2KDE Frameworks was uploaded days ago...17:53
tsimonq2slangasek: ah ok, it's going around I think (I have it too :/), get well soon17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (artful-proposed) [2.8.1-0ubuntu0.17.10.2]18:08
slangaseklooks like it's nodejs to blame for the queues18:11
tjaaltoncould someone mark bdfproxy autopkgtest triggered by pyasn1 as ignored, it's blocking python-ldap18:17
tjaaltonand also mark freeipa ignored on python-ldap triggered tests18:18
tjaaltonnot permanently, should be a one-off thing to unblock 389-ds-base18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.4.0-1~16.04.1]18:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.10.0-1~16.04.1]18:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.15-2~16.04.1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (artful-proposed) [17.2.8-0ubuntu0~17.10.1]19:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.2.8-0ubuntu0~16.04.1]19:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added budgie-extras to personal-fossfreedom in artful20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added budgie-extras to personal-fossfreedom in bionic20:07
wolsenany chance to release https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networking-l2gw/+bug/1737040 into artful?21:25
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1737040 in networking-l2gw (Ubuntu Artful) "[SRU] Update to networking-l2gw 11.0.0 for Pike" [Medium,Fix committed]21:25
slangasekcpaelzer: you appear to be proposing a hint for the wrong version of 389-ds-base; is the version in -proposed that has working autopkgtests21:57
tjaaltonslangasek: that's why I asked to ignore some tests to let pyasn1 & python-ldap to migrate, which would unblock 389-ds-base22:17
slangasektjaalton: indeed; though I'm going to need a rationale on why it's correct to ignore those failures, especially for ignoring a freeipa/4.4.4-4 failure on python-ldap when 4.4.4-4 is the version that's supposed to have fixed tests22:21
tjaaltonwell, maybe I overlooked something in the new python-ldap, it fails to install test dependencies22:23
tjaaltonhang on22:23
tjaaltonmaybe it's the dep on newer pyasn1?22:26
tjaaltonso touch that first, ignore bdfproxy on amd6422:26
tjaaltonheck, I'll send a merge proposal for that22:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hoel [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hoel [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: multitime [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3-1] (no packageset)23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3 => 0.8.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: multitime [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3-1] (no packageset)23:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hoel [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: multitime [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3-1] (no packageset)23:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!