[05:34] <cpaelzer> good morning
[07:35] <lordievader> Good morning
[08:57] <cpaelzer> rbasak: If you'd have a few minutes for an easy review https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/sanlock/+git/sanlock/+merge/336757
[08:58] <cpaelzer> rbasak: this is blocking libvirt builds, so resolving asap would be nice
[08:58] <cpaelzer> (for now I uploaded a ~ppa version to unblock me there)
[11:33] <cpaelzer> jamespage: coreycb: did you see my mail about libvirt storage backends on Friday?
[11:34] <cpaelzer> it would be great to do the first upload the way you need it instead of shuffling things around afterwards
[11:34] <cpaelzer> so if you'd have a minute please give it a read
[11:48] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: hi, 'morning. I added a comment to https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-fan/+git/ubuntu-fan/+merge/335746, pinging you here in case you miss the email
[11:48] <ahasenack> it's an old MP for which we were just waiting in the bionic merge, which finally happened
[11:49]  * cpaelzer reading ...
[11:50] <cpaelzer> yes I agree ahasenack
[11:51] <cpaelzer> oh this was one of the cases with being the upstream in ubuntu failing to fetch the tarball
[11:51] <ahasenack> git-ubuntu?
[11:53] <cpaelzer> yep
[11:53] <cpaelzer> I can get around it
[11:53] <ahasenack> thx
[11:53] <cpaelzer> but do you remember if we had a bug for it?
[11:53] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: yes, https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1737640
[11:53] <cpaelzer> or 1741472
[11:54] <ahasenack> ah, you mean git-ubuntu
[11:54] <cpaelzer> yep
[11:54] <ahasenack> did you get that TypeError backtrace?
[11:55] <cpaelzer> no it is different now
[11:55] <cpaelzer> I update the bug already
[11:55] <ahasenack> ok
[11:57] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: bug updated, tag uploaded, package in unapproved queue
[11:57] <ahasenack> thanks, I'll watch over it now
[11:58] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: I wasn't able to catch rbasak yet, if you'D have time (trivial MP) for https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/sanlock/+git/sanlock/+merge/336757 that would be great as I need it to unblock some other things
[11:58] <ahasenack> sure
[12:41] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: thanks for taking a look at sanlock
[12:42] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: I replied on the MP, but TL;DR yes this is how upstream does it
[12:42] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: I didn't want to rewrite what they do, just fix the packaging around how it is atm
[12:42] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: do you think I should drop that fix from the upload instead?
[12:42] <cpaelzer> the one that is blocking me is the less discussion worth ordering in postinst
[12:48] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: I found another bug, but unrelated to your fix
[12:48] <ahasenack> it just uncovered it
[12:48] <ahasenack> Jan 29 12:48:02 useful-dassie systemd-wdmd[5472]: /lib/systemd/systemd-wdmd: line 51: failure: command not found
[12:49] <ahasenack> that "failure" shell func might be defined in redhat only
[12:49] <ahasenack> I suppose the "success" one too
[12:50] <cpaelzer> hehe
[12:50] <cpaelzer> can of worms :-/
[12:50] <ahasenack> I'll file a bug for it
[12:51] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: the sanlock init also has these
[12:51] <cpaelzer> but that is no more called these days
[12:52] <ahasenack> yeah, my other comment was going to be to drop the sysv script
[12:52] <ahasenack> but since it's used in the systemd hack
[12:52] <ahasenack> I guess we have to keep it one way or the other
[12:52] <cpaelzer> it sources /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions - maybe that is where it expects it from
[12:53] <cpaelzer> yep that is where my fedora has it
[12:53] <cpaelzer> part of initscripts-9.79-1.fc27.x86_64
[12:53] <ahasenack> it also sources /etc/sysconfig/<stuff>
[12:53] <ahasenack> very fedora-like
[12:54] <cpaelzer> yes :-/
[12:54] <cpaelzer> for now I at least want to get it as-working-as-before
[12:54] <cpaelzer> ignoring all the extra clutter (for now)
[12:54] <ahasenack> I filed a bug about that and gave a =1
[12:54] <ahasenack> er
[12:54] <ahasenack> +1
[12:55] <coreycb> cpaelzer: yes i did see your email. james and i need to sync up on that and get back to you.
[12:56] <cpaelzer> coreycb: ok, but please do realize that you wait on me and I wait on you :-)
[12:56] <cpaelzer> coreycb: so help yourself by providing that answer fast :-)
[12:56] <cpaelzer> thanks ahasenack
[12:57] <cpaelzer> fyi ahasenack - https://askubuntu.com/questions/531189/ubuntu-equivalent-of-centos-success-failure
[12:57] <cpaelzer> but it is not directly reusable
[14:33] <rh10> hey. guys, it there any good tutorial how can i build .deb package from sources?
[14:37] <mason> rh10: Fresh .deb packaging or rebuilding a .deb from a source package?
[14:37] <rh10> mason, fresh package
[14:37] <mason> rh10: https://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian
[14:37] <rh10> mason, thanks!
[14:38] <mason> Should all apply to Ubuntu too.
[14:38] <rh10> got it
[15:33] <ahasenack> lamont: hey, around?
[17:07] <jdstrand> Odd_Bloke: hey, I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1746012 today and wanted to make sure it showed up on someone's radar (I see that Foundations is subscribed to rsyslog)
[17:08] <jdstrand> Odd_Bloke: I could do the upload myself, but wanted to at least check with someone
[17:09] <sdeziel> oh yeah, that one's annoying
[18:36] <mgariepy> ping cpaelzer
[18:36] <mgariepy> do you have a minute to talk about: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1583009
[18:37] <sarnold> it may be past cpaelzer's end-of-day
[18:37] <mgariepy> ha :( i'll try to catch him tomorrow then
[18:38] <mgariepy> thank sarnold
[18:38] <sarnold> hang around a little bit, you never know..
[18:38] <sarnold> but still, don't feel bad if you don't get a reply for another ten or twelve hours :)
[18:38] <mgariepy> yeah i know IRC :)
[18:39] <sarnold> okay :)
[18:41] <cpaelzer> mgariepy: it is past my EOD
[18:41] <cpaelzer> I'm just running by a few times, but might be dragged away again any minute
[18:43] <cpaelzer> mgariepy: I updated the bug in reply to your question 6 minutes ago
[18:57] <mgariepy> cpaelzer, ok perfect.
[22:22] <Epx998> Mmm ubuntu arm64, a new challenge
[22:23] <sdeziel> s/rm/md/; done
[22:24] <sdeziel> :D
[22:26] <Epx998> we are testing with some new qualcomm servers, the firmware they shipped is us pretty bad