| === Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er | ||
| jamespage | cpaelzer: I have a 2.9 snapshot in a PPA | 06:47 |
|---|---|---|
| jamespage | but its failing some tests on arm64 atm | 06:47 |
| jamespage | https://launchpad.net/~james-page/+archive/ubuntu/bionic/+packages | 06:48 |
| cpaelzer | ok, thanks for the info | 06:48 |
| jamespage | first thing I normally do with a new release is re-enable all of the skipped tests and try them out again | 06:48 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga | ||
| === fossfreedom_ is now known as fossfreedom | ||
| jamespage | anyone around who has some familiarity with debhelper, dpkg, debug symbols and how that works in PPA's which generate and publish them? | 10:03 |
| jamespage | I'm endeavouring to backport debhelper >= 11 to xenial for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive, but I'm missing something in the dance between debhelper, pkgbinarymangler and pkg-create-dbgsym | 10:05 |
| jamespage | I'm aware there are alot of dpkg changes between xenial and bionic including the one to support Package-Type overrides which debhelper uses at bionic but hoping to avoiding including dpkg in the backport... | 10:12 |
| === lool- is now known as lool | ||
| doko | cjwatson: man-db ftbfs on ppc64el | 11:30 |
| jamespage | meh no worries - figured it out and have enough of a compat shim for the backport | 11:36 |
| infinity | jamespage: Erm. | 11:38 |
| infinity | jamespage: Backporting debhelper should revert the ddeb support. | 11:38 |
| infinity | jamespage: Any other option will end in tears. | 11:38 |
| jamespage | infinity: yeah I'd got that - the piece I'd missed was the change to dh_strip to stop debhelper building the debug packages | 11:39 |
| jamespage | "+$dh{ENABLE_DBGSYM} = 0 if not $ENV{'DH_BUILD_DDEBS'};" | 11:39 |
| jamespage | was my friend | 11:39 |
| jamespage | infinity: I think this - http://paste.ubuntu.com/26524058/ does the trick | 11:40 |
| infinity | jamespage: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/10.2.5ubuntu2 was where I swapped methods. | 11:40 |
| doko | mwhudson: golang-1.10 ftbfs on armhf | 11:40 |
| infinity | jamespage: Yep, that looks like it should do it. | 11:41 |
| jamespage | infinity: I'd generally got a bit confused as to which parts pkg-create-dbgsym, debhelper and pkgbinarymangler did | 11:41 |
| jamespage | them diverts ... | 11:41 |
| jamespage | anyway I now know (at least I think I do) | 11:42 |
| infinity | jamespage: The pkgbinarymangler dpkg-deb divert is not one of my prouder moments. Don't look at that postinst if you value your sanity. | 11:42 |
| jamespage | lol | 11:42 |
| * jamespage shuts his eyes and just holds on for a bit | 11:43 | |
| infinity | jamespage: (The part where there's a brief period on every single buildd build where dpkg-deb doesn't exist, in the middle of unpacking, is... Fun) | 11:43 |
| jamespage | infinity: I also enjoyed the bit where pkgbinarymangler copies in part of debhelper as part of its build | 11:43 |
| jamespage | coreycb: I think I have it nailed now - just working the updates into queens-staging to unbreak all the broken builds from friday... | 11:45 |
| cjwatson | doko: already dealt with in Debian; it'll auto-sync | 12:05 |
| coreycb | jamespage: great thanks. so will the ppa still be able to generate ddebs? | 12:39 |
| jamespage | coreycb: yes | 13:14 |
| coreycb | jamespage: ok cool | 13:15 |
| GunnarHj | chrisccoulson: Have you seen that adobe-flashplugin is stuck in -proposed? | 14:01 |
| GunnarHj | https://community.ubuntu.com/t/flash-version-in-xenial-partner-archive-canonical-com/3865 | 14:03 |
| ackk | cjwatson, hi, I have a refreshed patch for py-macaroon-bakery 1.1.0: https://pastebin.canonical.com/209182/ I can build the updated package with it. would it be possible for you to update it? | 15:54 |
| mitya57 | cyphermox, doko: do you have any status update on bug 1636666? can you please reply to my comment there? | 15:58 |
| ubottu | bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1636666 | 15:58 |
| ackk | cjwatson, or, https://paste.ubuntu.com/26525107/ | 15:58 |
| cjwatson | ackk: Yeah, I guess I can just go with that, just a minute | 15:58 |
| doko | mitya57: can it be built using pcre3? | 15:59 |
| mitya57 | No :( | 15:59 |
| doko | and how much in main can be built using pcre2? | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | ackk: (I had half of that but was missing the other half, it seems, not sure why) | 16:00 |
| mitya57 | http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/whatsnew59.html — “QRegularExpression now requires the PCRE2 library version 10.20, or later. Support for the PCRE1 library was dropped.” | 16:00 |
| doko | so how much can we rebuild? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/pcre2.html | 16:00 |
| mitya57 | There is some estimate in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre2/+bug/1636666/comments/20 | 16:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,New] | 16:01 |
| mitya57 | That is at least half of the packages from that tracker | 16:01 |
| doko | who is working on that to build packages with pcre2 if they can? | 16:02 |
| mitya57 | I can try to help with that, maybe jbicha and/or LocutusO- would be able to help too. | 16:03 |
| mitya57 | apache2 may be a problem though: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 | 16:04 |
| ubottu | bz.apache.org bug 57471 in Build "Apache 2.4.10 Compilation fails when compiling against pcre2-10.00" [Enhancement,New] | 16:04 |
| cjwatson | ackk: Yep, thanks, that works, will upload | 16:04 |
| ackk | cjwatson, thank you | 16:05 |
| cjwatson | done | 16:05 |
| mitya57 | doko: I meant at least half of packages from *this* tracker: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/pcre2-main.html (your link includes also universe) | 16:06 |
| doko | ahh, I see | 16:07 |
| ackk | cjwatson, awesome, thanks | 16:07 |
| mitya57 | exim4 may be a problem too: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878 | 16:07 |
| ubottu | bugs.exim.org bug 1878 in Unfiled "add support for pcre2" [Wishlist,New] | 16:07 |
| mitya57 | I guess I should collect some bug links and add them to the description | 16:08 |
| jbicha | no one is working on getting glib to not use pcre3 | 16:08 |
| jbicha | on the other hand, tilix and gnome-builder have missing features because Ubuntu's vte2.91 isn't allowed to use pcre2 yet | 16:10 |
| doko | php7.2 is missing in this tracker | 16:10 |
| doko | silly gnome | 16:10 |
| jbicha | the main tracker is manually compiled so you're welcome to add php7.2 if you like :) | 16:11 |
| mitya57 | So we have two solutions here: 1) Have both pcre3 and pcre2 in main, with a goal of removing pcre3 in later release, 2) Have only pcre3, Qt using its own copy and GNOME missing some features | 16:11 |
| chrisccoulson | GunnarHj, ah, crap. Thanks for that. sil2100, can you take care of that please? (I think you approved the upload originally) | 16:12 |
| chrisccoulson | sil2100, if you can't see the scrollback: | 16:13 |
| chrisccoulson | <GunnarHj> chrisccoulson: Have you seen that adobe-flashplugin is stuck in -proposed? | 16:13 |
| chrisccoulson | <GunnarHj> https://community.ubuntu.com/t/flash-version-in-xenial-partner-archive-canonical-com/3865 | 16:13 |
| mitya57 | Looks like php7.2 supports only pcre3 and php7.3 only supports pcre2 | 16:13 |
| jbicha | Qt is in main because of qtubuntu (kiosk project) and mozc (Japanese input method) | 16:13 |
| mitya57 | And php7.3 is not going to be released any time soon… | 16:14 |
| sil2100 | chrisccoulson: hey, for this I think you'll need slangasek | 16:15 |
| doko | jbicha, mitya57: I would like to avoid a situation where we have both in main, and everybody is comfortable with it | 16:18 |
| mitya57 | I understand, but the goal porting everything to pcre2 does not seem achievable in one release cycle | 16:19 |
| jbicha | the current vte2.91 situation isn't comfortable :/ | 16:19 |
| mitya57 | Even if we keep pcre2 in universe for this cycle, next time php7.3 will be released and we'll get in the same situation | 16:20 |
| doko | so do the promotion after the bionic release? | 16:20 |
| mitya57 | I won't mind that, but we will technically have pcre2 in main as part of Qt anyway | 16:21 |
| doko | or get some buy-in from the tech board and the security team | 16:21 |
| mitya57 | doko: I just added lists of good/bad packages to the description of bug 1636666 | 16:41 |
| ubottu | bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1636666 | 16:41 |
| mitya57 | (It is worse than I thought, most of packages don't even have upstream bugs filed for pcre2 move) | 16:42 |
| chrisccoulson | sil2100, you should be able to do it (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Handling_updates_to_partner) | 16:42 |
| bdmurray | Why does rmadison still show zesty information? | 17:25 |
| cjwatson | bdmurray: needs manual editing of snakefruit:~ubuntu-archive/.madison-lite/config. Fixed now | 17:36 |
| nacc | (should that be added to the EOL checklist, if not already there?) | 17:36 |
| bdmurray | cjwatson: thanks | 17:37 |
| slangasek | chrisccoulson: "stuck in proposed" - so you're saying that the adobe-flashplugin versions in *-proposed are tested and ready to copy to release? | 17:38 |
| chrisccoulson | slangasek, yeah | 17:38 |
| doko | mitya57: thanks! so I'm still not sure if it's better to delay that promotion until after bionic | 17:39 |
| bdmurray | nacc: Its not there https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EndOfLifeProcess | 17:39 |
| nacc | bdmurray: ack; i feel like that's probably the release team's page to edit :) | 17:40 |
| bdmurray | nacc: whatever, I'm gonna edit it | 17:40 |
| slangasek | chrisccoulson: done | 17:40 |
| chrisccoulson | slangasek, thanks | 17:40 |
| nacc | bdmurray: :) | 17:41 |
| cjwatson | bdmurray: process> good call, thanks | 17:59 |
| coolfish | hi, approx. on Fri 26. January I asked on #ubuntu-devel, what I can do, to put the package ganeti on a list for 'big' packages for autopkgtest(-VMs). The reason is http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/ganeti/bionic/amd64. I've verified, that autopkgtest passed with 4GB of RAM. The default of 1536MB is to small. | 19:41 |
| coolfish | because I'm no dev (just a user), someone on this channel said, that he has done it for me. Now (2018-02-05 15:13:30 UTC) the test still fails, with the error message: Not enough memory on node node1 for creating instance instance1: needed 1024 MiB, available 810 MiB | 19:41 |
| coolfish | so it seems, ganeti is still with default size autopkgtest-VM | 19:41 |
| === zyga is now known as potato | ||
| === potato is now known as elvis | ||
| === elvis is now known as zyga | ||
| doko | nacc: I removed kopanocore, so zeroc-ice is the only one not building for php7.2. but mumble depends on that one | 20:59 |
| acheronuk | nice. lintian in bionic proposed is uninstallable | 21:10 |
| acheronuk | https://paste.ubuntu.com/26526608/ | 21:11 |
| sarnold | ssleay | 21:13 |
| sarnold | oy | 21:13 |
| nacc | doko: removed as in from the archive? | 21:14 |
| nacc | doko: or in which sense? I have fixes for it pending (which I will send to Debian in the bug you filled), but it's segfaulting in my testing (not sure if it's related to PHP yet | 21:15 |
| nacc | doko: i'm also workig onn zeroc-ice, which needs to be updated to 3.7.0 at lelast | 21:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!