[00:05] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[00:05] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_discover build #69: FIXED in 2 hr 50 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_discover/69/
[00:06] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[00:06] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_unstable_discover build #76: FIXED in 2 hr 51 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_unstable_discover/76/
[00:06] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[00:06] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project artful_unstable_discover build #201: FIXED in 2 hr 51 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/artful_unstable_discover/201/
[03:57] <ahoneybun> I should reboot at some point lol
[09:45] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » linode-01 build #2046: SUCCESS in 52 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=linode-01/2046/
[09:46] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » master build #2046: SUCCESS in 1 min 11 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=master/2046/
[09:48] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » swy-01 build #2046: SUCCESS in 3 min 52 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=swy-01/2046/
[10:38] <sitter> is anyone going to port ubiquity to qt5?
[10:41] <blaze> isn't it ported yet?
[10:45] <blaze> Depends: python3:any (>= 3.3.2-2~), ubiquity (= 17.10.10), python3-pyqt5, kde-window-manager | kwin, xauth, python3-dbus, python3-dbus.mainloop.pyqt5, python3-pyqt5.qtwebkit, python3-pyqt5.qtsvg
[10:46] <blaze> I'm pretty sure it is :)
[11:03] <acheronuk> sitter: what makes you say that?
[11:07] <sitter> oh maybe it is ported after all
[11:08] <sitter> now that I think about it I guess breeze pulls in qt4 :(
[11:08] <acheronuk> yeah. sadly it does
[11:09] <IrcsomeBot1> <tomazcanabrava> Why ? I have breeze on my system without qt4
[11:09] <IrcsomeBot1> <tomazcanabrava> (Not kubuntu one tougth)
[11:10] <yofel> do we still need it?
[11:13] <sitter> it's an upstream expectation that qt4 is properly themed which means the qt4 theme needs to be pre-installed
[11:13] <sitter> I do however wonder if we could just break the shlibs dependency there. so you can have the theme package but no qt4 installed
[11:15] <sitter> mh, probably not feasible since it depends on kdelibs
[11:16] <IrcsomeBot1> <tomazcanabrava> You can split kdelibs to not have kdelibs4-support and build those that needs it in a separated package ?
[11:55] <sitter> what we could do is kde-style-breeze-qt4 (depends: kde-style-breeze-noqt4 | kde-style-breeze-withqt4)... kde-style-breeze-withqt4 (actual data) ... kde-style-breeze-noqt4 (empty dummy, breaks: libqtcore4)
[11:56] <sitter> so long as the meta package is installed, installing qt4 would switch the dummy for the actual style, forcefully installing the dummy would conversely force qt4 out of the system
[12:13] <acheronuk> if that works as you say, then maybe.....
[13:06] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_unstable_latte-dock build #70: FAILURE in 6 min 49 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_unstable_latte-dock/70/
[13:23] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Starting build #107 for job mgmt_pause_integration (previous build: ABORTED)
[13:34] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_pause_integration build #107: ABORTED in 11 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_pause_integration/107/
[13:43] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_unstable_latte-dock build #71: STILL FAILING in 31 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_unstable_latte-dock/71/
[14:56] <BluesKaj> Hi folks
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
[15:17] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_latte-dock build #64: STILL FAILING in 9 min 44 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_latte-dock/64/
[15:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_unstable_latte-dock build #72: STILL FAILING in 29 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_unstable_latte-dock/72/
[15:31] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_latte-dock build #65: STILL FAILING in 8 min 45 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_latte-dock/65/
[15:34] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_unstable_latte-dock build #73: STILL FAILING in 10 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_unstable_latte-dock/73/
[15:45] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » linode-01 build #2047: SUCCESS in 42 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=linode-01/2047/
[15:46] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » master build #2047: SUCCESS in 1 min 2 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=master/2047/
[15:46] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> https://kubuntu.org/news/plasma-5-12-arrives-in-backport-ppa-for-kubuntu-17-10-artful-aardvark/
[15:48] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_docker » swy-01 build #2047: SUCCESS in 3 min 38 sec: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_docker/label=swy-01/2047/
[15:51] <mamarley> acheronuk: And it runs very nicely, thanks!
[15:57] <acheronuk> mamarley: Kool
[16:00] <blaze> what about bb?
[16:01] <acheronuk> blaze: I uploaded earlier. will need to build and get through proposed.
[16:01] <acheronuk> It's mildly nuts that it's easier to do backports!
[16:01] <blaze> lol
[16:02] <yofel> acheronuk for core-dev! :D
[16:02] <yofel> and thanks for the backports
[16:03] <acheronuk> hmmm. yeah. I could do with access to biletto staging ppas. to do a direct copy to proposed!
[18:03] <blaze> frameworks are here too, as I see
[18:03] <blaze> good stuff
[20:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[20:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project bionic_stable_latte-dock build #66: FIXED in 1 hr 3 min: https://kci.pangea.pub/job/bionic_stable_latte-dock/66/
[21:45] <valorie> !info amdgpu-pro artful
[21:45] <ubottu> Package amdgpu-pro does not exist in artful
[21:46] <valorie> !info amdgpu-pro
[21:46] <ubottu> Package amdgpu-pro does not exist in bionic
[21:54] <nauticalnexus> valorie, amdgpu-pro is only available through AMD
[21:54] <nauticalnexus> I don't even think it's in the repos in 16.04
[21:54] <nauticalnexus> !info amdgpu-pro xenial
[21:54] <ubottu> Package amdgpu-pro does not exist in xenial
[21:55] <genii> the -pro driver is still proprietary
[21:55] <nauticalnexus> Yeah ik
[21:55] <nauticalnexus> I use proprietary stuff everyday though doesn't matter to me
[21:55] <nauticalnexus> It'd be in restricted if it was in Ubuntu
[23:04] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> So how does this thing work? https://phabricator.kde.org/T7523 … Do I get the job because I'm the only one who signed up? :D Or is there something else to be done?
[23:06] <valorie> replied on there
[23:07] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> great, thanks!
[23:07] <valorie> Rick has been gone for a couple of weeks because his mother is in hospital and last I knew it looked very grave for her
[23:07] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> oh no :(
[23:07] <valorie> haven't heard anything since
[23:07] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> send my condolences
[23:08] <valorie> I imagine that is work is the last thing on his mind right now
[23:08] <valorie> but what you are doing within KDE is so tremendous
[23:08] <valorie> it's just great
[23:08] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> thanks! :)
[23:13] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> Running 5.12 on my Kubuntu 17.10 with the backports PPA, BTW. Very smooth upgrade; only one issue: https://phabricator.kde.org/T7905
[23:18] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> very odd
[23:18] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> indeed
[23:19] <acheronuk> mparillo DarinMiller mamarley did you see anything like that issue in that phab link?
[23:20] <mamarley> acheronuk: Nope, no such issue here.
[23:20] <valorie> I haven't rebooted yet, but not in the beta
[23:21] <mamarley> The only issue I have had is that I can't get the desktop icons to display on the second monitor's desktop anymore, but as I understand that is by design.
[23:22] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> @nggraham did you have them enabled at any point in the past? maybe some residual config that a behviour change mistook as being that they should be enabled?
[23:22] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> no, never
[23:26] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> will have to keep an eye out for other reports then.
[23:26] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> cool, thanks!
[23:27] <IrcsomeBot1> <nggraham> otherwise, +1, very easy smooth upgrade
[23:29] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> good. :) that was one reason I was keen to build the beta and iron stuff out with that. smoother sailing now
[23:38] <mparillo> acheronuk: In my 17.10 VM with Backports Landing, Konsole and Kate have the regular menu (File Edit, View, etc.) Discover does not, but I do not think it ever did.
[23:39] <acheronuk> ummmmmmmmmmmm. dunno. I don't use it much. it's been too awful. I must test the 5.12 version
[23:43] <mparillo> https://imgur.com/a/kovch
[23:44] <mparillo> I have a different 17.10 VM that I can apply regular backports (instead of backports-landing)
[23:44] <mparillo> Might be a while
[23:45] <acheronuk> I tried several permutations to test. 
[23:46] <acheronuk> upgrade from stock artful straight to full backports + landing = what is in there now
[23:46] <acheronuk> or artful plus previous backports, then with the new stuff on top
[23:46] <acheronuk> both seemed ok
[23:48] <mparillo> OK, Firing up a fresh VM with 17.10.1 testing
[23:51] <mparillo> Untouched since 17.10.1 was in testing (the first RC was the final IIRC). Adding backports. Full-Upgrade says 317 packages. It will take a while.
[23:54] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> @nggraham interesting comment from Kai https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389318#c1
[23:54] <ubottu> KDE bug 389318 in kcmshell "menubar section in settings has been disappeared" [Normal,Resolved: wontfix]
[23:55] <IrcsomeBot1> <acheronuk> so maybe you had something set you did not mean or forgot?
[23:59] <mparillo> The way I read the bug report it could be something as simple as adding an widget that you did not realize applies global menus.
[23:59] <mparillo> And that would explain why we do not see it when testing very vanilla installs.
[23:59] <mparillo> vanilla .EQ. unmodified