| === Neo5 is now known as Neo4 | ||
| cpaelzer | good morning | 05:39 |
|---|---|---|
| lordievader | Good morning | 07:09 |
| jamespage | coreycb: dealing with the cmake foobar in queens-proposed now (we need a newer version for debhelper compat 11) | 09:24 |
| ahasenack | rbasak or cpaelzer, hi, could one of you please (re)import ubuntu-advantage-tools into git? I think it's out of date there | 12:28 |
| rbasak | Looking | 12:29 |
| rbasak | Importing | 12:30 |
| ahasenack | thx | 12:30 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: it's still running but didn't seem to take anything new | 12:32 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: https://code.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/+git lists it as updated just now. | 12:33 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: did we just race the importer? | 12:33 |
| rbasak | Or did cpaelzer just do it? | 12:33 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: anyway, it looks fine now | 12:33 |
| ahasenack | but odd that we would have raced the importer, since there were no new uploads in weeks | 12:34 |
| rbasak | You're right | 12:34 |
| rbasak | Perhaps we raced cpaelzer :-) | 12:34 |
| ahasenack | or maybe I missed a --force in my previous pull | 12:34 |
| ahasenack | thanks anyway | 12:34 |
| rbasak | It's definitely just been pushed to | 12:34 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: I'm getting a debian/patches warning with this repo: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/26529688/ | 12:46 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: to my knowledge there shouldn't be such a directory (it's a native package), much less an empty one | 12:46 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: rbasak: I didn't import it | 12:46 |
| cpaelzer | not in a racy manner at least, maybe weeks ago but not today | 12:46 |
| ahasenack | it exists here, though: https://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/tree/debian/patches | 12:46 |
| coreycb | jamespage: oh that's a pita | 12:52 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: cpaelzer: there is something wrong with my MP to ubuntu-advantage-tools (https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/337213), I could use some assistance | 13:17 |
| ahasenack | fyi the diff is showing "new" files like debian/rules (!) | 13:17 |
| ahasenack | or debian/tests/control | 13:17 |
| ahasenack | but they exist already in the git repo, branch ubuntu/devel (https://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/tree/debian/tests/control) | 13:17 |
| slashd | how one can test a partman-partioning patch using a PPA ? So far I have tried to build partman-partitioning and then d-i within the same PPA and redirect the installer to my PPA using "apt-setup/overlay ..." but without success. | 13:18 |
| ahasenack | slashd: maybe you need to create a new iso. I know simpoir has done that to test a landscape-client patch for a bug that happened inside the ubuntu server install, he might have scripts to help doing that | 13:20 |
| slashd | ahasenack, tks will ping him | 13:21 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: I don't follow what's going on there either. | 13:23 |
| rbasak | Maybe a Launchpad bug or oddity? | 13:23 |
| rbasak | #launchpad might be the place to ask | 13:24 |
| ahasenack | ok | 13:24 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: I don't see d/rules as new file | 13:26 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: maybe it was an artifact while still updating the diff? | 13:26 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: in launchpad? | 13:26 |
| cpaelzer | yes | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | on https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/337213 | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | I thought that was what you linked | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | ... yes it was | 13:27 |
| ahasenack | I just reloaded | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | 3 hits for debian/rules - all ok | 13:27 |
| ahasenack | it's still showing, for examplple, debian/rules (+6/-0) | 13:27 |
| rbasak | I see preview diff c05adda into ae690c9 on 2018-02-06 | 13:27 |
| rbasak | Line 117 | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | same preview hashes | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | for me | 13:27 |
| rbasak | diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules | 13:27 |
| rbasak | new file mode 100755 | 13:27 |
| rbasak | index 0000000..0cd4e1d | 13:27 |
| rbasak | --- /dev/null | 13:27 |
| rbasak | +++ b/debian/rules | 13:27 |
| jamespage | coreycb: I think its a straight backport - just waiting for the arm arch to build and will re-test ceph | 13:27 |
| coreycb | jamespage: that'd be nice | 13:28 |
| cpaelzer | not for me | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | ah well now I see | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | yeah the header is null vs d/rules | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | but the content is just fine | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | but it's treated as a new file | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | or is that just that small of a d/rules | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | all lines are new | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | checking the actual mp | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | just a sec | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | that's the whole d/rules | 13:29 |
| cpaelzer | oh I see | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | the only diff should be in the flake8 line | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | from: flake8 tests | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | to: python3 /usr/bin/flake8 tests | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | and that's what you see if you do "git diff ubuntu/devel" while on my branch | 13:31 |
| cpaelzer | yeah I checked git diff c05adda ae690c9 -- debian/rules | 13:31 |
| ahasenack | git diff bionic-version-14..ubuntu/devel -- debian/rules | 13:32 |
| ahasenack | shows the correct thing | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | yep | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | which are the names for the hashes I used | 13:32 |
| ahasenack | even better | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | but also the same hashes that LP displays | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | odd | 13:32 |
| coreycb | jamespage: i'm fixing up heat-dashboard to include the js files | 13:33 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: do you mind submitting the same in a new branch name? | 13:33 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: to see if it is reproducible | 13:33 |
| ahasenack | basically git checkout -b new-name; git push ? | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | and make a new mp? | 13:34 |
| cpaelzer | yep | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | ok | 13:34 |
| cpaelzer | we could also use resubmit proposal, but I'd keep the broken one for later analysis by LP team | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | same thing | 13:35 |
| ahasenack | https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/337215 | 13:35 |
| ahasenack | diff is updating still, but the "31 files modified" again shows debian/rules as a new file | 13:35 |
| cpaelzer | I refreshed and see it - same problem | 13:36 |
| ahasenack | I'll delete it | 13:36 |
| jamespage | coreycb: I need todo some sort of bootstrap dance for networking-bagpipe/bgpvpn right? | 14:40 |
| coreycb | jamespage: yes. i wasn't sure if i should upload directly to -proposed so i didn't touch that. | 14:40 |
| Odd_Bloke | cpaelzer: Thanks for that vagrant review! I'll look at it soon. | 14:40 |
| coreycb | jamespage: if you upload 8.0.0~b3-0ubuntu1 of both first, then you'll be able to upload the latest versions once those publish | 14:41 |
| cpaelzer | Odd_Bloke: y | 14:42 |
| cpaelzer | y | 14:42 |
| cpaelzer | damn | 14:42 |
| cpaelzer | yw | 14:42 |
| jamespage | coreycb: ok - I'll delete current versions and direct upload to -proposed | 14:42 |
| cpaelzer | IRC stutter | 14:42 |
| coreycb | jamespage: ok thanks | 14:42 |
| Odd_Bloke | cpaelzer: Hah, I hadn't nominated it for series because I didn't think I could; turns out I can! | 14:47 |
| cpaelzer | use your powers Odd_Bloke | 14:48 |
| Odd_Bloke | cpaelzer: So I went for ubuntu1 because ubuntu0.1 suggests a security fix to me; more than happy to change it, just explaining my thought process. :) | 14:52 |
| Odd_Bloke | But I couldn't quite decide (and eventually just went with what dep3changelog produced. :p) | 14:52 |
| cpaelzer | I knew | 14:53 |
| cpaelzer | Odd_Bloke: the format it creates for the LP ref is unique | 14:53 |
| cpaelzer | so one can see that it was dep3changelog | 14:53 |
| cpaelzer | :-) | 14:53 |
| cpaelzer | Odd_Bloke: force pusher :-P | 15:07 |
| cpaelzer | Odd_Bloke: reviewed the new code and acked | 15:19 |
| cpaelzer | Odd_Bloke: added a hint to reuse on the SRU template | 15:19 |
| cpaelzer | Odd_Bloke: do you need me to sponsor this? | 15:20 |
| cpaelzer | I assume you are in ubuntu-cloud-uploaders, so I guess not | 15:21 |
| jamespage | coreycb: ah | 15:36 |
| jamespage | python-sphinxcontrib.blockdiag (>= 1.5.4), python-sphinxcontrib.seqdiag (>= 0.8.4) | 15:36 |
| coreycb | jamespage: gah, what's that from. that is my fault. | 15:36 |
| Odd_Bloke | cpaelzer: :) I _think_ I'm fine. | 15:36 |
| coreycb | jamespage: my handy new tool is too precise ;) | 15:36 |
| jamespage | coreycb: that was from the networking-bgp/bagpipe stuff | 15:36 |
| coreycb | jamespage: oh i thought i got rid of that | 15:37 |
| jamespage | coreycb: do I just need to skiptest each one | 15:38 |
| coreycb | jamespage: yes, for the first upload and then they'll be good to run tests next upload | 15:38 |
| coreycb | jamespage: maybe you can just do that with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | 15:39 |
| nacc_ | coreycb: jamespage: buildl profile? | 16:27 |
| jamespage | nacc_: yeah I was pondering that but don't quite know how to get that to happen in a PPA | 16:31 |
| nacc_ | jamespage: yeah there is a way, let me see if i can find it | 16:34 |
| * jamespage sighs | 16:34 | |
| jamespage | coreycb: I messed up with the versioning... | 16:34 |
| jamespage | fixing now... | 16:34 |
| nacc_ | jamespage: oh maybe it was just being discussed as possible (by the LP folks), sorry | 16:36 |
| nacc_ | possible to implement | 16:36 |
| nacc_ | I just did it "in archive" for PHP by commenting out stuff, then re-adding it | 16:36 |
| Scott0_ | im getting uncompression error system halted during both full iso and with the mini using usb | 17:28 |
| Scott0_ | memtest shows no errors with memory | 17:29 |
| Scott0_ | im not sure where to go from here | 17:29 |
| Scott0_ | does it try to uncompress to disk or to memory during install? | 17:30 |
| TJ- | Scott0_: have you verified the image on the USB device is not corrupted? | 17:30 |
| Scott0_ | yes | 17:31 |
| Scott0_ | I compared to checksum | 17:31 |
| Scott0_ | im using rufus to write the usb from iso | 17:31 |
| Scott0_ | I assume it does a check before it says its completed | 17:32 |
| Scott0_ | maybe a bad assumption :/ | 17:32 |
| Scott0_ | but I've tried the mini afew times and the regular iso a few times | 17:32 |
| Scott0_ | is this just a matter of memory bad or the usb being corrupted? | 17:33 |
| Scott0_ | is there a version of the installer that's smaller where I can download packages from the net to complete the install? | 17:34 |
| Scott0_ | I read one page that talked about the dvd drive being sda and causing conflict with where ubuntu expected to decompress the image | 17:35 |
| Scott0_ | but that seems unlikely | 17:36 |
| TJ- | Whenever I've had a doubt I've generated a hash of the image on the USB device itself to be sure it's not corrupt. If that is fine it suggests there's some I/O errors during reading the device, or as you've suggested, RAM problems | 17:53 |
| Scott0_ | yeah I've tried 4 different usb drives | 17:53 |
| Scott0_ | and memtest ran for 24h with no errors | 17:54 |
| Scott0_ | im gonna try an ubuntu livecd and see if I can get that to install. I read that there is no difference in the server and desktop kernel now | 17:54 |
| teward | there isn't in the kernel. there's difference from the overhead needed to run the system. | 18:08 |
| teward | (GUI is evil!) | 18:08 |
| Scott0_ | I know | 18:08 |
| Scott0_ | im confused as to why there is even a gui on a server install... | 18:08 |
| Scott0_ | that seems silly | 18:08 |
| teward | (there isn't, it's a TUI) | 18:09 |
| Scott0_ | tui? | 18:09 |
| dpb1 | text user interface! | 18:09 |
| teward | text-based user interface. | 18:09 |
| Scott0_ | odd I remember it loading a gui a while back for server install | 18:09 |
| teward | instead of a graphical user interface. | 18:09 |
| teward | Scott0_: never has had a GUI installer for Server. GUI is Desktop only. You *could* run a server via the GUI installer, but... | 18:10 |
| teward | the GUI adds headaches. | 18:10 |
| Scott0_ | so I could use a desktop livecd to install server? | 18:10 |
| dpb1 | Scott0_: it shouldn't be warned, the live image as of today hits this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1747723 | 18:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1747723 in Ubuntu CD Images "ubuntu server daily has no subiquity snap, installer does not start" [Undecided,New] | 18:10 |
| Scott0_ | can I avoid the gui install? | 18:10 |
| dpb1 | Scott0_: but, as long as you are not testing bionic, you will be fine. | 18:10 |
| teward | Scott0_: I would use the server ISO if you want a non-GUI installation prompt | 18:11 |
| teward | the desktop ISO and server ISO also install different default packagesets in the OS, mostly GUI and such software instead of the 'bare minimum' needed for servers | 18:11 |
| Scott0_ | teward, im having an issue installing from the server iso | 18:13 |
| Scott0_ | black screen | 18:13 |
| Scott0_ | if I use vga=ask and then continue, I get an uncompression error system halted | 18:13 |
| Scott0_ | wow, I tried with the livecd and I still get an uncompression error | 18:20 |
| teward | sounds like you have a bigger problem than just the ISO used for installing | 18:20 |
| Scott0_ | yeah | 18:20 |
| Scott0_ | if not memory what else could it be? | 18:20 |
| Scott0_ | is it maybe something with ahci? | 18:21 |
| teward | Scott0_: have you confirmed that you have valid ISOs, verifying the sums against known good ones? | 18:21 |
| Scott0_ | yes | 18:22 |
| Scott0_ | every time | 18:22 |
| teward | have you run memtest or something to actually test your RAM to determine if it's bad or not? | 18:22 |
| teward | i know it sounds like stupid questions, but i arrived late :) | 18:22 |
| Scott0_ | yes ran 24h with no errors | 18:22 |
| Scott0_ | 32BG 4 sticks total | 18:22 |
| Scott0_ | the ahci bios does say something on boot about being only for sata and dvd drives | 18:25 |
| Scott0_ | would this cause issue with the usb? | 18:26 |
| Scott0_ | I have not tried as IDE yet, but I didn't intend to install without ahci | 18:27 |
| Scott0_ | nevermind, uncompression error on IDE also :/ | 18:30 |
| Scott0_ | memtest can load to memory and so can freedos, why can't ubuntu? | 18:30 |
| === TJ_Remix is now known as TJ- | ||
| Scott0_ | it could be that every usb disk I write is corrupted | 19:08 |
| Scott0_ | what would cause that? | 19:08 |
| sarnold | usb sticks are notoriously crap | 19:11 |
| apb1963 | ubuntu 16.04... hostapd exits prematurely. some details here: https://pastebin.com/GcNS6V4J | 19:14 |
| nacc_ | !crosspost | apb1963 | 19:15 |
| ubottu | apb1963: Please don't ask the same question in multiple Ubuntu channels at the same time. Many helpers are in more than one channel and it's not fair to them or the other people seeking support. | 19:15 |
| apb1963 | nacc_, yes... many are... and many aren't. | 19:15 |
| apb1963 | nacc_, I was addressing those that aren't. | 19:16 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: so ... ignoring the faq. | 19:16 |
| apb1963 | nacc_, I'm curious... how old are you? | 19:17 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: why does that matter? | 19:17 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: please stay ontopic | 19:17 |
| apb1963 | nacc_, just curious if your attitude can be attributed to your age. | 19:17 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: i'm not sure what attitude you have a problem with. You crossposted a question, which we try to discourage, and I pointed you to the reasoning not to do that. | 19:20 |
| apb1963 | You mean because of the overwhelming number of questions being asked here? The tremendous activity? | 19:22 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: no, and that's not the reason cited in the faq. | 19:22 |
| sarnold | because it's annoying as hell to work with someone in one channel while they're getting different advice in another channel. | 19:23 |
| apb1963 | sarnold, And if I were getting advice in another channel... I wouldn't ask in a second one. | 19:23 |
| nacc_ | !patience | apb1963 | 19:24 |
| ubottu | apb1963: Don't feel ignored and repeat your question quickly; if nobody knows your answer, nobody will answer you. While you wait, try searching https://help.ubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org or https://askubuntu.com/ | 19:24 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: so one or both of those FAQs apply. | 19:24 |
| apb1963 | I didn't repeat it, I asked it elsewhere. | 19:24 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: you asked in #ubuntu | 19:24 |
| apb1963 | yes... yes I did. | 19:24 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: then rather than wait for an answer there, you posted in a *different* channel | 19:24 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: so you were both impatient and crossposted. | 19:25 |
| apb1963 | I waited long enough to see that nobody was going to respond in a reasonable period of time. | 19:25 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: 6 minutes? | 19:25 |
| apb1963 | yep | 19:25 |
| apb1963 | I should wait for hours? Days? What is acceptable to you oh king? | 19:26 |
| nacc_ | apb1963: alright, I hope you have a nice day. | 19:26 |
| apb1963 | you too | 19:26 |
| Scott0_ | teward: when writing to the usb with passmarks imageUSB, I did receive errors on writing to the usb and numerous failures on the verify operation | 20:17 |
| Scott0_ | teward: im gonna try a new usb with imageUSB and ubuntu server and see if I have better luck | 20:18 |
| Scott0_ | odd that rufus doesn't do verification after the write | 20:20 |
| Scott0_ | success! | 20:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!