[05:39] <cpaelzer> good morning
[07:09] <lordievader> Good morning
[09:24] <jamespage> coreycb: dealing with the cmake foobar in queens-proposed now (we need a newer version for debhelper compat 11)
[12:28] <ahasenack> rbasak or cpaelzer, hi, could one of you please (re)import ubuntu-advantage-tools into git? I think it's out of date there
[12:29] <rbasak> Looking
[12:30] <rbasak> Importing
[12:30] <ahasenack> thx
[12:32] <rbasak> ahasenack: it's still running but didn't seem to take anything new
[12:33] <rbasak> ahasenack: https://code.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/+git lists it as updated just now.
[12:33] <rbasak> ahasenack: did we just race the importer?
[12:33] <rbasak> Or did cpaelzer just do it?
[12:33] <ahasenack> rbasak: anyway, it looks fine now
[12:34] <ahasenack> but odd that we would have raced the importer, since there were no new uploads in weeks
[12:34] <rbasak> You're right
[12:34] <rbasak> Perhaps we raced cpaelzer :-)
[12:34] <ahasenack> or maybe I missed a --force in my previous pull
[12:34] <ahasenack> thanks anyway
[12:34] <rbasak> It's definitely just been pushed to
[12:46] <ahasenack> rbasak: I'm getting a debian/patches warning with this repo: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/26529688/
[12:46] <ahasenack> rbasak: to my knowledge there shouldn't be such a directory (it's a native package), much less an empty one
[12:46] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: rbasak: I didn't import it
[12:46] <cpaelzer> not in a racy manner at least, maybe weeks ago but not today
[12:46] <ahasenack> it exists here, though: https://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/tree/debian/patches
[12:52] <coreycb> jamespage: oh that's a pita
[13:17] <ahasenack> rbasak: cpaelzer: there is something wrong with my MP to ubuntu-advantage-tools (https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/337213), I could use some assistance
[13:17] <ahasenack> fyi the diff is showing "new" files like debian/rules (!)
[13:17] <ahasenack> or debian/tests/control
[13:17] <ahasenack> but they exist already in the git repo, branch ubuntu/devel (https://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/tree/debian/tests/control)
[13:18] <slashd> how one can test a partman-partioning patch using a PPA ? So far I have tried to build partman-partitioning and then d-i within the same PPA and redirect the installer to my PPA using "apt-setup/overlay ..." but without success.
[13:20] <ahasenack> slashd: maybe you need to create a new iso. I know simpoir has done that to test a landscape-client patch for a bug that happened inside the ubuntu server install, he might have scripts to help doing that
[13:21] <slashd> ahasenack, tks will ping him
[13:23] <rbasak> ahasenack: I don't follow what's going on there either.
[13:23] <rbasak> Maybe a Launchpad bug or oddity?
[13:24] <rbasak> #launchpad might be the place to ask
[13:24] <ahasenack> ok
[13:26] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: I don't see d/rules as new file
[13:26] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: maybe it was an artifact while still updating the diff?
[13:26] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: in launchpad?
[13:27] <cpaelzer> yes
[13:27] <cpaelzer> on https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/337213
[13:27] <cpaelzer> I thought that was what you linked
[13:27] <cpaelzer> ... yes it was
[13:27] <ahasenack> I just reloaded
[13:27] <cpaelzer> 3 hits for debian/rules - all ok
[13:27] <ahasenack> it's still showing, for examplple, debian/rules (+6/-0)
[13:27] <rbasak> I see preview diff c05adda into ae690c9 on 2018-02-06
[13:27] <rbasak> Line 117
[13:27] <cpaelzer> same preview hashes
[13:27] <cpaelzer> for me
[13:27] <rbasak> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
[13:27] <rbasak> new file mode 100755
[13:27] <rbasak> index 0000000..0cd4e1d
[13:27] <rbasak> --- /dev/null
[13:27] <rbasak> +++ b/debian/rules
[13:27] <jamespage> coreycb: I think its a straight backport - just waiting for the arm arch to build and will re-test ceph
[13:28] <coreycb> jamespage: that'd be nice
[13:29] <cpaelzer> not for me
[13:29] <cpaelzer> ah well now I see
[13:29] <cpaelzer> yeah the header is null vs d/rules
[13:29] <cpaelzer> but the content is just fine
[13:29] <ahasenack> but it's treated as a new file
[13:29] <cpaelzer> or is that just that small of a d/rules
[13:29] <ahasenack> all lines are new
[13:29] <cpaelzer> checking the actual mp
[13:29] <cpaelzer> just a sec
[13:29] <ahasenack> that's the whole d/rules
[13:29] <cpaelzer> oh I see
[13:30] <ahasenack> the only diff should be in the flake8 line
[13:30] <ahasenack> from: 	flake8 tests
[13:30] <ahasenack> to: 	python3 /usr/bin/flake8 tests
[13:31] <ahasenack> and that's what you see if you do "git diff ubuntu/devel" while on my branch
[13:31] <cpaelzer> yeah I checked git diff c05adda ae690c9 -- debian/rules
[13:32] <ahasenack> git diff bionic-version-14..ubuntu/devel -- debian/rules
[13:32] <ahasenack> shows the correct thing
[13:32] <cpaelzer> yep
[13:32] <cpaelzer> which are the names for the hashes I used
[13:32] <ahasenack> even better
[13:32] <cpaelzer> but also the same hashes that LP displays
[13:32] <cpaelzer> odd
[13:33] <coreycb> jamespage: i'm fixing up heat-dashboard to include the js files
[13:33] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: do you mind submitting the same in a new branch name?
[13:33] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: to see if it is reproducible
[13:34] <ahasenack> basically git checkout -b new-name; git push ?
[13:34] <ahasenack> and make a new mp?
[13:34] <cpaelzer> yep
[13:34] <ahasenack> ok
[13:34] <cpaelzer> we could also use resubmit proposal, but I'd keep the broken one for later analysis by LP team
[13:35] <ahasenack> same thing
[13:35] <ahasenack> https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/337215
[13:35] <ahasenack> diff is updating still, but the "31 files modified" again shows debian/rules as a new file
[13:36] <cpaelzer> I refreshed and see it - same problem
[13:36] <ahasenack> I'll delete it
[14:40] <jamespage> coreycb: I need todo some sort of bootstrap dance for networking-bagpipe/bgpvpn right?
[14:40] <coreycb> jamespage: yes. i wasn't sure if i should upload directly to -proposed so i didn't touch that.
[14:40] <Odd_Bloke> cpaelzer: Thanks for that vagrant review!  I'll look at it soon.
[14:41] <coreycb> jamespage: if you upload 8.0.0~b3-0ubuntu1 of both first, then you'll be able to upload the latest versions once those publish
[14:42] <cpaelzer> Odd_Bloke: y
[14:42] <cpaelzer> y
[14:42] <cpaelzer> damn
[14:42] <cpaelzer> yw
[14:42] <jamespage> coreycb: ok - I'll delete current versions and direct upload to -proposed
[14:42] <cpaelzer> IRC stutter
[14:42] <coreycb> jamespage: ok thanks
[14:47] <Odd_Bloke> cpaelzer: Hah, I hadn't nominated it for series because I didn't think I could; turns out I can!
[14:48] <cpaelzer> use your powers Odd_Bloke
[14:52] <Odd_Bloke> cpaelzer: So I went for ubuntu1 because ubuntu0.1 suggests a security fix to me; more than happy to change it, just explaining my thought process. :)
[14:52] <Odd_Bloke> But I couldn't quite decide (and eventually just went with what dep3changelog produced. :p)
[14:53] <cpaelzer> I knew
[14:53] <cpaelzer> Odd_Bloke: the format it creates for the LP ref is unique
[14:53] <cpaelzer> so one can see that it was dep3changelog
[14:53] <cpaelzer> :-)
[15:07] <cpaelzer> Odd_Bloke: force pusher :-P
[15:19] <cpaelzer> Odd_Bloke: reviewed the new code and acked
[15:19] <cpaelzer> Odd_Bloke: added a hint to reuse on the SRU template
[15:20] <cpaelzer> Odd_Bloke: do you need me to sponsor this?
[15:21] <cpaelzer> I assume you are in ubuntu-cloud-uploaders, so I guess not
[15:36] <jamespage> coreycb: ah
[15:36] <jamespage> python-sphinxcontrib.blockdiag (>= 1.5.4), python-sphinxcontrib.seqdiag (>= 0.8.4)
[15:36] <coreycb> jamespage: gah, what's that from. that is my fault.
[15:36] <Odd_Bloke> cpaelzer: :)  I _think_ I'm fine.
[15:36] <coreycb> jamespage: my handy new tool is too precise ;)
[15:36] <jamespage> coreycb: that was from the networking-bgp/bagpipe stuff
[15:37] <coreycb> jamespage: oh i thought i got rid of that
[15:38] <jamespage> coreycb: do I just need to skiptest each one
[15:38] <coreycb> jamespage: yes, for the first upload and then they'll be good to run tests next upload
[15:39] <coreycb> jamespage: maybe you can just do that with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
[16:27] <nacc_> coreycb: jamespage: buildl profile?
[16:31] <jamespage> nacc_: yeah I was pondering that but don't quite know how to get that to happen in a PPA
[16:34] <nacc_> jamespage: yeah there is a way, let me see if i can find it
[16:34]  * jamespage sighs
[16:34] <jamespage> coreycb: I messed up with the versioning...
[16:34] <jamespage> fixing now...
[16:36] <nacc_> jamespage: oh maybe it was just being discussed as possible (by the LP folks), sorry
[16:36] <nacc_> possible to implement
[16:36] <nacc_> I just did it "in archive" for PHP by commenting out stuff, then re-adding it
[17:28] <Scott0_> im getting uncompression error system halted during both full iso and with the mini using usb
[17:29] <Scott0_> memtest shows no errors with memory
[17:29] <Scott0_> im not sure where to go from here
[17:30] <Scott0_> does it try to uncompress to disk or to memory during install?
[17:30] <TJ-> Scott0_: have you verified the image on the USB device is not corrupted?
[17:31] <Scott0_> yes
[17:31] <Scott0_> I compared to checksum
[17:31] <Scott0_> im using rufus to write the usb from iso
[17:32] <Scott0_> I assume it does a check before it says its completed
[17:32] <Scott0_> maybe a bad assumption :/
[17:32] <Scott0_> but I've tried the mini afew times and the regular iso a few times
[17:33] <Scott0_> is this just a matter of memory bad or the usb being corrupted?
[17:34] <Scott0_> is there a version of the installer that's smaller where I can download packages from the net to complete the install?
[17:35] <Scott0_> I read one page that talked about the dvd drive being sda and causing conflict with where ubuntu expected to decompress the image
[17:36] <Scott0_> but that seems unlikely
[17:53] <TJ-> Whenever I've had a doubt I've generated a hash of the image on the USB device itself to be sure it's not corrupt. If that is fine it suggests there's some I/O errors during reading the device, or as you've suggested, RAM problems
[17:53] <Scott0_> yeah I've tried 4 different usb drives
[17:54] <Scott0_> and memtest ran for 24h with no errors
[17:54] <Scott0_> im gonna try an ubuntu livecd and see if I can get that to install. I read that there is no difference in the server and desktop kernel now
[18:08] <teward> there isn't in the kernel.  there's difference from the overhead needed to run the system.
[18:08] <teward> (GUI is evil!)
[18:08] <Scott0_> I know
[18:08] <Scott0_> im confused as to why there is even a gui on a server install...
[18:08] <Scott0_> that seems silly
[18:09] <teward> (there isn't, it's a TUI)
[18:09] <Scott0_> tui?
[18:09] <dpb1> text user interface!
[18:09] <teward> text-based user interface.
[18:09] <Scott0_> odd I remember it loading a gui a while back for server install
[18:09] <teward> instead of a graphical user interface.
[18:10] <teward> Scott0_: never has had a GUI installer for Server.  GUI is Desktop only.  You *could* run a server via the GUI installer, but...
[18:10] <teward> the GUI adds headaches.
[18:10] <Scott0_> so I could use a desktop livecd to install server?
[18:10] <dpb1> Scott0_: it shouldn't be warned, the live image as of today hits this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1747723
[18:10] <Scott0_> can I avoid the gui install?
[18:10] <dpb1> Scott0_: but, as long as you are not testing bionic, you will be fine.
[18:11] <teward> Scott0_: I would use the server ISO if you want a non-GUI installation prompt
[18:11] <teward> the desktop ISO and server ISO also install different default packagesets in the OS, mostly GUI and such software instead of the 'bare minimum' needed for servers
[18:13] <Scott0_> teward, im having an issue installing from the server iso
[18:13] <Scott0_> black screen
[18:13] <Scott0_> if I use vga=ask and then continue, I get an uncompression error system halted
[18:20] <Scott0_> wow, I tried with the livecd and I still get an uncompression error
[18:20] <teward> sounds like you have a bigger problem than just the ISO used for installing
[18:20] <Scott0_> yeah
[18:20] <Scott0_> if not memory what else could it be?
[18:21] <Scott0_> is it maybe something with ahci?
[18:21] <teward> Scott0_: have you confirmed that you have valid ISOs, verifying the sums against known good ones?
[18:22] <Scott0_> yes
[18:22] <Scott0_> every time
[18:22] <teward> have you run memtest or something to actually test your RAM to determine if it's bad or not?
[18:22] <teward> i know it sounds like stupid questions, but i arrived late :)
[18:22] <Scott0_> yes ran 24h with no errors
[18:22] <Scott0_> 32BG 4 sticks total
[18:25] <Scott0_> the ahci bios does say something on boot about being only for sata and dvd drives
[18:26] <Scott0_> would this cause issue with the usb?
[18:27] <Scott0_> I have not tried as IDE yet, but I didn't intend to install without ahci
[18:30] <Scott0_> nevermind, uncompression error on IDE also :/
[18:30] <Scott0_> memtest can load to memory and so can freedos, why can't ubuntu?
[19:08] <Scott0_> it could be that every usb disk I write is corrupted
[19:08] <Scott0_> what would cause that?
[19:11] <sarnold> usb sticks are notoriously crap
[19:14] <apb1963>  ubuntu 16.04...  hostapd exits prematurely.   some details here: https://pastebin.com/GcNS6V4J
[19:15] <nacc_> !crosspost | apb1963
[19:15] <apb1963> nacc_, yes... many are... and many aren't.
[19:16] <apb1963> nacc_, I was addressing those that aren't.
[19:16] <nacc_> apb1963: so ... ignoring the faq.
[19:17] <apb1963> nacc_, I'm curious... how old are you?
[19:17] <nacc_> apb1963: why does that matter?
[19:17] <nacc_> apb1963: please stay ontopic
[19:17] <apb1963> nacc_, just curious if your attitude can be attributed to your age.
[19:20] <nacc_> apb1963: i'm not sure what attitude you have a problem with. You crossposted a question, which we try to discourage, and I pointed you to the reasoning not to do that.
[19:22] <apb1963> You mean because of the overwhelming number of questions being asked here?  The tremendous activity?
[19:22] <nacc_> apb1963: no, and that's not the reason cited in the faq.
[19:23] <sarnold> because it's annoying as hell to work with someone in one channel while they're getting different advice in another channel.
[19:23] <apb1963> sarnold, And if I were getting advice in another channel... I wouldn't ask in a second one.
[19:24] <nacc_> !patience | apb1963
[19:24] <nacc_> apb1963: so one or both of those FAQs apply.
[19:24] <apb1963> I didn't repeat it, I asked it elsewhere.
[19:24] <nacc_> apb1963: you asked in #ubuntu
[19:24] <apb1963> yes... yes I did.
[19:24] <nacc_> apb1963: then rather than wait for an answer there, you posted in a *different* channel
[19:25] <nacc_> apb1963: so you were both impatient and crossposted.
[19:25] <apb1963> I waited long enough to see that nobody was going to respond in a reasonable period of time.
[19:25] <nacc_> apb1963: 6 minutes?
[19:25] <apb1963> yep
[19:26] <apb1963> I should wait for hours?  Days?  What is acceptable to you oh king?
[19:26] <nacc_> apb1963: alright, I hope you have a nice day.
[19:26] <apb1963> you too
[20:17] <Scott0_> teward: when writing to the usb with passmarks imageUSB, I did receive errors on writing to the usb and numerous failures on the verify operation
[20:18] <Scott0_> teward: im gonna try a new usb with imageUSB and ubuntu server and see if I have better luck
[20:20] <Scott0_> odd that rufus doesn't do verification after the write
[20:30] <Scott0_> success!