[02:47] What is the name of software center binary? [02:47] In Ubutun is "software-center" [02:49] apt [02:50] I mean, the same for the graphical environment [02:50] I need to reconfigure the mirror for the repository [02:50] And this is a blind system [02:50] So I can ssh -X to it [02:51] But I need the name of the binary file [02:51] In order to configure the mirror address (to pick the best one) [02:53] The name of the app you can find in: Applications->System->Software Sources [02:54] (Its binary file name) [02:54] "software-properties-gtk" [02:55] Thank you krytarik [02:55] Thank you very much :-) [02:55] Sure. [10:00] hello? [10:02] \o [12:49] hi, anyone has tips on how to tile windows in a 66/33 split instead of 50/50? [14:43] Hi, should I be concerned about the script I ran to test if my system was vulnerabole to meltdown/spectre saying it still is, even after I've done all updates? === xqb` is now known as xqb [19:21] Does anybody know what happened to xfce4-hamster-plugin in 17.10? It seems it's no longer in the 'Extras' PPA === genius3k is now known as genius3000 [22:42] cicdc: You used it? Huh. Well there seemed to be very little interest, so we let it fade away. [22:42] :( [22:43] crond: I presume you ran spectre-meltdown-checker? Meltdown should be addressed, but Spectre isn't really. [22:43] Well I'll try the old fashion way and build from source [22:43] Thanks for the info [22:44] https://code.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+git/xfce4-hamster-plugin the packaging is all still there. [22:52] Unit193, yeah [22:53] You on 32bit? [22:54] No, 64bit [22:55] Linux 4.13.0-32-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 25 09:13:46 UTC 2018 [22:56] > STATUS: VULNERABLE (IBRS hardware + kernel support OR kernel with retpoline are needed to mitigate the vulnerability) [22:56] That's spectre. [22:56] Looks like 1 & 3 are not vulnerable, but 2 is. [22:57] Expected. [22:57] Anything I can do, or am I waiting on a BIOS update from Dell or CPU microcode or something? [22:58] That, or compiler updates and everything recompiled. [22:58] so basically it's all upstream one way or the other, i.e. nothing else I can do at the moment [22:58] Pretty much, yeah. Intel had a microcode update, but it caused issues. [22:59] yeah I heard about that, but had never applied it to this machine [22:59] well, I don't even know if it was pushed out for Linux in any case [23:00] (It was, Debian updated, then reverted because of the issues and recall.) [23:01] Ah okay [23:01] guess I'm waiting on Intel then, 2 of 3 are patched, nothing else to be done at the moment [23:02] thanks Unit193 [23:02] Sure thing. === xqb` is now known as xqb