[00:00] <nacc> RAOF: if i'm reading it right, just one changelog stanza missing?
[00:00] <RAOF> That's what it looks like to me, yes.
[00:00] <nacc> RAOF: i'm ready to upload, if so, if that's good by you
[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[00:01] <RAOF> I've just rejected both. You might need to wait for LP to process the removals before it'll let you upload again, but as soon as it lets you upload you're good to go :)
[00:02] <nacc> RAOF: i assume that one is the same rejection reason?
[00:02] <RAOF> nacc: Correct; both xenial and artful need the changelog entries.
[00:02] <nacc> RAOF: ack, i'll wait a bit and upload them both
[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tor (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.0.10-1 => 0.3.0.13-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (no packageset)
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tor [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.9.14-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tor [source] (artful-proposed) [0.3.0.13-0ubuntu1~17.10.1]
[00:17] <nacc> blackboxsw: RAOF: uploaded
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (artful-proposed/main) [17.2-30-gf7deaf15-0ubuntu1~17.10.1 => 17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [17.2-30-gf7deaf15-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[01:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (artful-proposed) [17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~17.10.1]
[01:37] <nacc> blackboxsw: dpb1 --^ should be ok now, fyi
[01:37] <blackboxsw> nacc:  thanks for the lift there. just got back
[01:38] <blackboxsw> it saves another day of waiting on -proposed publish. thanks again
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[03:16] <jbicha> RAOF: you're not a full Archive Admin, right?
[03:17] <RAOF> jbicha (IRC) You are correct.
[03:17] <jbicha> is there a list that shows which are full Archive Admins?
[03:18] <tsimonq2> jbicha: My first guess would be https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members
[03:18] <jbicha> we should just promote you and then we won't have this confusion :)
[03:18] <tsimonq2> ahh
[03:18] <tsimonq2> hm
[03:18] <tsimonq2> Yeah, that is confusing if RAOF isn't a "full" AA
[03:19] <RAOF> Yeah, yeah.
[03:19] <RAOF> I've never *quite* got the training :)
[03:19] <tsimonq2> Why don't you? :)
[03:19]  * jbicha adds AA Training to RAOF's calendar
[03:20] <RAOF> Partially because UTC+11 is not the most awesome timezone for AA overlap :)
[03:20] <RAOF> But yeah, I just need to make scheduled time for it.
[03:20] <dpb1> nacc: ty
[03:23] <jbicha> RAOF: if you were, LP: #1747033 is interesting. it's not listed as a task at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration
[03:25] <jbicha> I wonder how many mismatched packages like that we have. I had a test case in my original bug to demonstrate how it causes problems for transitional pkgs
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.22-1] (no packageset)
[07:29] <cpaelzer> still waiting for an ack by a MIR Team member on bug 1744072 to then do the seed changes
[07:29] <cpaelzer> if a MIR Team member would have some time that would be great
[08:23] <rbasak> The git "moved" URL at https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/britney2-ubuntu is broken
[08:23] <rbasak> It should be https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu I think
[08:26] <juliank> ping: https://code.launchpad.net/~juliank/britney/hints-ubuntu-artful/+merge/337667
[08:26] <juliank> jbicha: It seems there needs to be a tool that checks for packages with oldlibs in the package, but different override
[08:26] <juliank> at least
[08:27] <juliank> Or something that checks for transitional package not in oldlibs
[08:30] <juliank> the list is: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/dRcv7pS5Rh/
[08:31] <juliank> http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/myDqxwCfhH/
[08:31] <juliank> ^ 359 packages that have transitional in their description, but not in oldlibs, hence preventing apt from migrating the autobit
[08:32] <juliank> 2 might be false positives
[08:32] <juliank> This list only contains packages where transitional appears in the short description: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/phCsJgQ2D3/
[08:34] <juliank> better lists: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Qf5gCDCB8m/ (long), http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/dCp6xWgqxz/ (names only)
[08:35] <juliank> Found by: grep-dctrl -FDescription transitional --and --not -FSection oldlibs -s Package,Section,Size,Description  /var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.ubuntu.com_mirrors.txt_dists_bionic*Packages | sort-dctrl
[08:38] <juliank> um, I missed the ones with uppercase transitional
[08:38] <juliank> 545 packages: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/PDbWG2Zfvg/ (long), http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/gM8hFJ7TbX/ (names)
[08:42] <juliank> 57 in main
[08:44] <juliank> Now somebody just needs to xargs that list into change-override --section=oldlibs and we're done :D
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (artful-proposed/main) [1:10.0-2ubuntu3 => 1:10.0-2ubuntu3.1] (core)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-proposed/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.7 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.8] (core)
[11:36] <jbicha> juliank: sounds like good AA training material to me
[13:01] <tjaalton> could an AA release mesa from bionic NEW?
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mesa [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mesa [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mesa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mesa [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mesa [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mesa [i386] (bionic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[13:24] <tjaalton> hats off :)
[13:26] <jbicha> libgweather too please
[13:48] <xnox> slangasek, currently i'm blaming src:lvm2 which i want to demote to bionic-proposed; and push the artful's src:lvm2 back into bionic-release
[14:29] <arges> rbasak: reviewing xenial upload queue atm. starting from the top
[14:29] <rbasak> ack
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (artful-proposed) [2.9.0-1ubuntu3.1]
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.4]
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (artful-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu3.1 => 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-server)
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.7 => 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.8] (ubuntu-server)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ntp [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.8]
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ntp [source] (artful-proposed) [1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu3.2]
[14:53] <arges> rbasak: gotta run now, all yours
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (xenial-proposed/main) [1.157.16 => 1.157.17] (core, kernel)
[15:52] <ahasenack> hi, I need a component-mismatch fix for http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#sssd
[15:52] <ahasenack> python-sss is in main, that's the py2 version
[15:52] <ahasenack> python3-sss is in universe
[15:54] <rbasak> sil2100: are we duplicating effort on SRUs? I had been looking at util-linux. Looks like your released it earlier.
[15:55] <rbasak> I was looking into adding force-badtests for all the s390x failures that Joy identified.
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> anybody knows why gtk-doc fails the testsuite?
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> it fails in sbuild but not pbuilder
[16:20] <juliank> rbasak: I did a MP with the hints, and have been annoying here three times since yesterday I think
[16:21] <juliank> sil2100: rbasak: but we do need the new util-linux approved into xenial-proposed now :)
[16:21] <juliank> now that the old one is released, it's no longer blocked :)
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openssl1.0 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2n-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openssl1.0 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2n-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:42] <rbasak> sil2100: also were you looking at the DPDK MRE?
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openssl1.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2n-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openssl1.0 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2n-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openssl1.0 [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2n-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openssl1.0 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2n-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iraf-rvsao [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iraf-rvsao [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iraf-rvsao [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iraf-rvsao [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iraf-rvsao [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3-precis-i18n [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ippsample (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.0+20180213-0ubuntu1]
[18:11] <slangasek> xnox: I have no context for why you're blaming lvm2.  Rolling back versions is anyway not a long-term solution to anything
[18:14] <xnox> slangasek, true, currently bisecting lvm2, and/or will try to disable udev synchronisation in cryptsetup
[18:14] <xnox> slangasek, i believe "cryptsetup luks swap not working in ubiquity" is related to the "autopkgtest systemd fails in cryptsetup"
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-4.8 (trusty-proposed/main) [4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3 => 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4] (core) (sync)
[18:45] <tyhicks> sbeattie, apw: ^ I've just copied over the retpoline GCC update for Trusty
[18:46] <tyhicks> sbeattie: thanks for preparing that update!
[18:50] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: gtk-doc tests pass in sbuild locally too :(
[18:51] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, I'm doing some tests
[18:51] <LocutusOfBorg> I think it is related to a) VERBOSE=1 being set in buildd or b) SBUILD_USER being different
[18:51] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, I tried some rules-requires-root but nothing changes
[18:52] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+packages
[18:52] <LocutusOfBorg> lets see now
[18:52] <LocutusOfBorg> this is probably the last blocker for libunistring
[19:15] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, should be fine now, uploading
[19:17] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: do you want to do a merge proposal? https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk-doc
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-10.11] (core, kernel)
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-10.11]
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (xenial-proposed/main) [0.8.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.8.3-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[19:51] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, as soon as I make it build :/ I did export V=0 VERBOSE=0 and it worked, but I want to understand which one did the job
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, please don't ask me to open a merge request for this
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/357041139/gtk-doc_1.27-1ubuntu1_1.27-1ubuntu2.diff.gz
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> export V=0 does the trick
[20:10] <jbicha> ok
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:53] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: big thanks for fixing gtk-doc :)
[21:09] <sil2100> rbasak: I just released util-linux as I got a request for it, wasn't doing any other SRU work
[21:09] <sil2100> rbasak: sorry if that caused issues for you
[21:10] <sil2100> rbasak: and for DPDK I already approved the MRE, it's on the wiki page
[21:10] <sil2100> rbasak: I though I gave cpaelzer a heads up on IRC, but maybe it was just my imagination
[21:55] <rbasak> sil2100: OK, thanks
[21:56] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, to you :)
[22:11] <LocutusOfBorg> juliank, libunitstring is only missing guile-2.2 on arm64 and can go
[22:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm trying a build with gcc-6 to see if the ENOMEM works there
[22:12] <juliank> nice
[22:12] <LocutusOfBorg> any ideas are appreciated for guile-2.2, the Debian RC bug has no hints
[22:12] <LocutusOfBorg> and we need that to build :/
[22:13] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/14351800
[22:13] <LocutusOfBorg> this is the gcc-6 attempt
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:39] <superm1> backports team seems to not have had a lot of movement in a long  time.  if I have a backport that has passed the items in the checklist can I prepare it targeted for the right pocket and upload?
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [10-2build1 => 10-3] (core)
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [10-2build1 => 10-3] (core)
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [10-2build1 => 10-3] (core)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [10-2build1 => 10-3] (core)
[23:07] <tsimonq2> infinity, cjwatson: Hi there. Could I please get eyes on bug 1746807? Lubuntu's Alternate ISOs aren't building correctly, likely because of network configuration failing and package pools being missing.
[23:08] <tsimonq2> I'm very unfamiliar with the d-i internals, and I've had no success thus far trying to poke around on my own.
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22-2] (no packageset)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22-2] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22-2] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22-2] (no packageset)
[23:13] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: is this with calamares?
[23:13] <tsimonq2> If only I had that fancy archive snapshot thing juliank was talking about so I could use a mini ISO :)
[23:13] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: no, d-i
[23:13] <tsimonq2> ...
[23:14] <tsimonq2> (says that in the bug)
[23:14] <acheronuk> oh. sorry. just scanned it
[23:14] <tsimonq2> np
[23:15] <tsimonq2> cyphermox: ^^^^^^^
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22-2] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgeo-shapelib-perl [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22-2] (no packageset)