[17:33] <lubot> <acheronuk> Fwd from tsimonq2: File a block-proposed bug (or whatever) on Mesa.
[17:33] <lubot> <acheronuk> @mitya57 ^^^
[17:33] <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe let's remove qtbase task from that bug?
[17:33] <lubot> <acheronuk> qtbase was unintended casualty
[17:34] <lubot> <acheronuk> @mitya57, problem is, the bugfix is in Qt
[17:34] <lubot> <acheronuk> or at least last I saw
[17:36] <lubot> <acheronuk> could add the tag back once qtbase is through. one of thsoe situations where no one way is perfect
[17:36] <lubot> * acheronuk shrugs
[17:38] <lubot> <acheronuk> or take off qtbase for now, and add it back once you are landing a fixed qtbase?
[17:38] <lubot> <acheronuk> if it even needs to go back
[17:39] <lubot> <mitya57> https://codereview.qt-project.org/220412 might be an upstream fix for this
[17:41] <lubot> <mitya57> So let's wait a bit more, if that fix is accepted then cherry-pick it, otherwise add the bug tag back
[17:44] <lubot> <acheronuk> that was the idea. did not realise mesa was going to be quite so blocked on it's own issues the other day, so it was important to halt that