=== himcesjf_ is now known as him-cesjf [08:46] apw: to bad, cause my SD-card reader is useless now with daily kernels :) [08:47] * apw will have a think about it [08:47] :q === mamarley is now known as Guest13716 === mamarley_ is now known as mamarley [09:29] Good morning, are there any plans to deliver xenial kernels with the gcc-5 with the Retpoline patches that was released to updates yesterday ? [09:30] better check here before building my own :) [09:40] caribou, yes, the kernles in -proposed are compiled with that compiler [09:41] oh, cool thanks! less work for us :) [09:41] caribou, we build specifically using those ciompilers when they were in -proposed [09:42] yeah, I saw them hit -updates yesterday [09:42] good for us as we were trying to rebuild gcc7.3 on Xenial which is _not_ trivial [09:43] not trivial doesn't cover it, i am glad the compilers at least have not been my problem [11:39] apw: haha :) guess i'll just build it myself then :) np [11:57] dupondje, ? [11:57] i havent't had a look at your thing yet, so if you think that anything since then relates ... it does not [11:59] hey. when can I expect the kernel with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1742721 fixed to land in xenial? [11:59] Ubuntu bug 1742721 in Linux Mint "linux-image-4.13.0-26-generic / linux-image-extra-4.13.0-26-generic fail to boot" [Undecided,New] [11:59] uh, no idea why it's "Linux Mint". It's Ubuntu. [12:01] thresh, yeah don't worry about that, that is just because the first task on there is for that project [12:02] I also had a kernel panic with that specific kernel I tested latest yesterday. [12:03] but it's unrelated to the issue this kernel fixes; and I'm not sure it even makes sense to report a crash on a test kernel. [12:03] likely not worth it as that one is now old and will want to confim it exists in the latest before investigating in the normal course of things [12:05] thresh, the patch for that bug is queued for the next SRU cycle, which will probably start within the next days [12:06] Its likely one of the many things to come once we have normality... Not that I would know what is normal right now anyway but roughly it might be around March-01 when normal cycles start again [12:14] klebers, good to know - thanks! === mamarley is now known as Guest76632 === mamarley_ is now known as mamarley [16:15] I'm trying to build a custom kernel for ubuntu 16.04 using the mainline patches all here: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.9.76/ [16:16] I'm also apply preempt-rt patches as I need this to be a realtime kernel. In the past I build the kernel and .deb packages like this: skipabi=true skipmodule=true fdr binary-indep [16:17] skipabi=true skipmodule=true fdr binary-perarch [16:17] skipabi=true skipmodule=true fdr binary-rt [16:17] and finally: dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -I.git -I.gitignore [16:18] Is this the right way to do it or is there a better or simpler way? [16:19] Oh, sorry - fdr is an alias for 'fakeroot debian/rules' [16:20] I'm getting an error: utils/helpers/amd.c:7:21: fatal error: pci/pci.h: No such file or directory, and I'm thinking something is not right in the build setup or something? [16:29] mozmck, that sounds like you need more build-dependencies installed to me; overall your approach sounds plausible [16:30] Hmm, I wonder which build-deps I might need? I did find that I had to install libudev-dev [16:32] I have in my notes from doing this with 14.04 that I had to fix a header file when building this way, but not if I ran make deb-pkg. Odd. [16:35] that doesn't really add up, but then i am constantly supprised by what is actually true [16:48] mozmck: libpci-dev (for cpupower) [16:51] thanks! [16:51] I figured out I did not run apt-get build-dep linux either, so that may help. [16:53] :p yeah [16:54] Yeah, looks like that did it :-) Sorry for the noise. [17:35] It looks like it got to the end of the compile and then gave me this error and quit: https://pastebin.com/LrCRgjyv [17:36] That was the fakeroot debian/rules binary-rt step (rt is my custom flavour) [17:37] mozmck, you need to disable zfs, do_zfs=false [17:38] ah, thanks. I know I won't need that. [17:57] you don't have the code for it, whihc is why the pakcage is blowing chunks [18:44] Well, adding do_zfs=false to the command line did not seem to have any effect. I notice in debian/rules that there is a do_mainline_build which sets do_extras_package and do_tools both to false as well as do_zfs=false. I may try that because I don't think I need the tools and extra packages either. === himcesjf_ is now known as him-cesjf