/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/02/25/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-date-time [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)05:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-rollup-plugin-buble [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.15.0-1] (no packageset)05:15
rbasakddstreet: IIRC I rejected dpkg once due to lack of bug reference in the changelog. I'm not sure if that was your one.09:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jquery-caret.js [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.1+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: nx-libs (bionic-proposed/primary) [2:3.5.99.13-4]13:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]13:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jquery-caret.js [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg.1-2]13:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-date-time [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.0-1]13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-rollup-plugin-buble [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.15.0-1]13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-npm-bundled [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1]13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vmdb2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.12-1]13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)13:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)13:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)13:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)17:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]21:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]21:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]21:22
xnoxinfinity, slangasek: i think src:systemd should ship "dummy" transitional packages initscripts & upstart, which are full of rm_conffile21:57
xnoxor maybe not src:upstart, but like something call "upgrade purger"21:57
xnoxor maybe not src:upstart, but like something called "upgrade purger"21:57
slangasekxnox: I would not object to such dummy packages to handle the upgrade cleanup21:58
xnoxto clean up, after packages that are removed from the archive, but had coffiles, xenial->bionic.21:58
slangasekxnox: it's "cleaner" than doing it in the release upgrader; but I'm fine with that also21:58
xnoxand we may assemble them in a single source package, and generate the right binary names, with the right versions, etc.21:59
slangasekLaney: s390x autopkgtest queue is underperforming; I haven't looked into it yet https://cloud.kpi.canonical.com/dashboard/db/ubuntu-foundations?panelId=19&fullscreen&orgId=1&from=1519291919551&to=151959480547222:12
slangasekinfinity: ^^ need more glibc uploads, that's a great dataset for assessing the autopkgtest throughput22:13
jbichaslangasek: could you look into LP: #1718529 when you have a chance to try to unblock NM & ppp ?22:14
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1718529 in fso-gsmd (Ubuntu) "Please remove fso* packages from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/171852922:14
slangasekjbicha: sure; do you want to trade me for analysis / fixing of the glibc-triggered autopkgtest regressions, which is what I was going to be working on? :)22:15
infinityThere aren't many, thankfully.22:15
jbichacough, cough, cough22:15
slangasekastroscrappy is almost certainly badtest, I just hadn't figured out what that means yet22:15
infinityWaking up to the sea of green was a pleasant surprise.22:15
infinityslangasek: That string doesn't appear in astrocrappy's source, so I assume it's a dep that hates life.22:16
infinityBut that's as far as I dug before reminding myself it's a weekend.22:16
jbichaI thought you guys were making up the name of that packageā€¦22:18
slangasekI remembered the s22:18
slangasekinfinity ... refactored it22:18
slangasekI assume astroscrappy is an add-on package for astroscooby22:18
jbicha"Optimized Cosmic Ray Annihilation in Python 3"22:19
jbichaoh, the github acronym is better "Speedy Cosmic Ray Annihilation Package in Python"22:20
xnoxslangasek, what about nvidia-304? it's blocking my xorg upgrade fix.... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1748000 or should i be working with the kernel team to fix it, because hwe & xenial still probably needs to ship nvidia 304?!22:23
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1748000 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu) "Remove from the archive: this legacy driver is unmaintained upstream" [Critical,Triaged]22:23
jbichaxnox: I'm hoping the mesa/nvidia transition finishes on Monday, not sure how much it's related to your bug22:24
slangasekxnox: ok, that one I'll trade you for the libunistring-triggered regression in tracker, which looks like it might be a difficult-to-bisect gnulib problem ;)22:28
xnoxslangasek, this is not how the scrub poker is supposed to work!22:29
xnox*scrum22:29
* jbicha folds22:29
* xnox ponders if we can make an Agile method based on the Risk strategy board game of diplomacy, conflict and conquest22:30
slangasekxnox: I think you care about tracker, libunistring is tied to libcurl422:32
xnoxsigh22:32
slangasekxnox: speaking of which, we've got Debian maintainer ack, I think we should proceed with that upload at least22:37
xnoxslangasek, yes, my plan was to kick it off on Monday.22:37
slangasekok22:37
xnoxslangasek, it will need new queue processing, so will not upload no change rebuilds. Unless I do the doko hack of the .dsc22:38
xnoxto include extra build-depends on libcurl-dev (>= bla)22:38
slangasekick no :)22:38
acheronukslangasek: can the ppc64el and s390x tests on parley be ignored please? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#parley23:11
acheronukas it no longer builds on those architectures23:12
acheronuk^^^ not urgent :)23:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!