=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-date-time [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset) [05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-rollup-plugin-buble [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.15.0-1] (no packageset) [09:51] ddstreet: IIRC I rejected dpkg once due to lack of bug reference in the changelog. I'm not sure if that was your one. [11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jquery-caret.js [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.1+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset) [13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: nx-libs (bionic-proposed/primary) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jquery-caret.js [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg.1-2] [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-date-time [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.0-1] [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-rollup-plugin-buble [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.15.0-1] [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-npm-bundled [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1] [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vmdb2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.12-1] [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset) [13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset) [13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset) [13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset) [13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset) [13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset) [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4] [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset) [17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset) [17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset) [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset) [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset) [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset) [21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2] [21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2] [21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2] [21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2] [21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2] [21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2] [21:57] infinity, slangasek: i think src:systemd should ship "dummy" transitional packages initscripts & upstart, which are full of rm_conffile [21:57] or maybe not src:upstart, but like something call "upgrade purger" [21:57] or maybe not src:upstart, but like something called "upgrade purger" [21:58] xnox: I would not object to such dummy packages to handle the upgrade cleanup [21:58] to clean up, after packages that are removed from the archive, but had coffiles, xenial->bionic. [21:58] xnox: it's "cleaner" than doing it in the release upgrader; but I'm fine with that also [21:59] and we may assemble them in a single source package, and generate the right binary names, with the right versions, etc. [22:12] Laney: s390x autopkgtest queue is underperforming; I haven't looked into it yet https://cloud.kpi.canonical.com/dashboard/db/ubuntu-foundations?panelId=19&fullscreen&orgId=1&from=1519291919551&to=1519594805472 [22:13] infinity: ^^ need more glibc uploads, that's a great dataset for assessing the autopkgtest throughput [22:14] slangasek: could you look into LP: #1718529 when you have a chance to try to unblock NM & ppp ? [22:14] Launchpad bug 1718529 in fso-gsmd (Ubuntu) "Please remove fso* packages from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1718529 [22:15] jbicha: sure; do you want to trade me for analysis / fixing of the glibc-triggered autopkgtest regressions, which is what I was going to be working on? :) [22:15] There aren't many, thankfully. [22:15] cough, cough, cough [22:15] astroscrappy is almost certainly badtest, I just hadn't figured out what that means yet [22:15] Waking up to the sea of green was a pleasant surprise. [22:16] slangasek: That string doesn't appear in astrocrappy's source, so I assume it's a dep that hates life. [22:16] But that's as far as I dug before reminding myself it's a weekend. [22:18] I thought you guys were making up the name of that package… [22:18] I remembered the s [22:18] infinity ... refactored it [22:18] I assume astroscrappy is an add-on package for astroscooby [22:19] "Optimized Cosmic Ray Annihilation in Python 3" [22:20] oh, the github acronym is better "Speedy Cosmic Ray Annihilation Package in Python" [22:23] slangasek, what about nvidia-304? it's blocking my xorg upgrade fix.... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1748000 or should i be working with the kernel team to fix it, because hwe & xenial still probably needs to ship nvidia 304?! [22:23] Ubuntu bug 1748000 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu) "Remove from the archive: this legacy driver is unmaintained upstream" [Critical,Triaged] [22:24] xnox: I'm hoping the mesa/nvidia transition finishes on Monday, not sure how much it's related to your bug [22:28] xnox: ok, that one I'll trade you for the libunistring-triggered regression in tracker, which looks like it might be a difficult-to-bisect gnulib problem ;) [22:29] slangasek, this is not how the scrub poker is supposed to work! [22:29] *scrum [22:29] * jbicha folds [22:30] * xnox ponders if we can make an Agile method based on the Risk strategy board game of diplomacy, conflict and conquest [22:32] xnox: I think you care about tracker, libunistring is tied to libcurl4 [22:32] sigh [22:37] xnox: speaking of which, we've got Debian maintainer ack, I think we should proceed with that upload at least [22:37] slangasek, yes, my plan was to kick it off on Monday. [22:37] ok [22:38] slangasek, it will need new queue processing, so will not upload no change rebuilds. Unless I do the doko hack of the .dsc [22:38] to include extra build-depends on libcurl-dev (>= bla) [22:38] ick no :) [23:11] slangasek: can the ppc64el and s390x tests on parley be ignored please? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#parley [23:12] as it no longer builds on those architectures [23:15] ^^^ not urgent :)