[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-date-time [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-rollup-plugin-buble [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.15.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:51] <rbasak> ddstreet: IIRC I rejected dpkg once due to lack of bug reference in the changelog. I'm not sure if that was your one.
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jquery-caret.js [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.3.1+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: nx-libs (bionic-proposed/primary) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jquery-caret.js [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg.1-2]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-date-time [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-rollup-plugin-buble [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.15.0-1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-npm-bundled [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vmdb2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.12-1]
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nx-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2:3.5.99.13-4] (no packageset)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nx-libs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.5.99.13-4]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.7-2] (no packageset)
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.7-2]
[21:57] <xnox> infinity, slangasek: i think src:systemd should ship "dummy" transitional packages initscripts & upstart, which are full of rm_conffile
[21:57] <xnox> or maybe not src:upstart, but like something call "upgrade purger"
[21:57] <xnox> or maybe not src:upstart, but like something called "upgrade purger"
[21:58] <slangasek> xnox: I would not object to such dummy packages to handle the upgrade cleanup
[21:58] <xnox> to clean up, after packages that are removed from the archive, but had coffiles, xenial->bionic.
[21:58] <slangasek> xnox: it's "cleaner" than doing it in the release upgrader; but I'm fine with that also
[21:59] <xnox> and we may assemble them in a single source package, and generate the right binary names, with the right versions, etc.
[22:12] <slangasek> Laney: s390x autopkgtest queue is underperforming; I haven't looked into it yet https://cloud.kpi.canonical.com/dashboard/db/ubuntu-foundations?panelId=19&fullscreen&orgId=1&from=1519291919551&to=1519594805472
[22:13] <slangasek> infinity: ^^ need more glibc uploads, that's a great dataset for assessing the autopkgtest throughput
[22:14] <jbicha> slangasek: could you look into LP: #1718529 when you have a chance to try to unblock NM & ppp ?
[22:14] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1718529 in fso-gsmd (Ubuntu) "Please remove fso* packages from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1718529
[22:15] <slangasek> jbicha: sure; do you want to trade me for analysis / fixing of the glibc-triggered autopkgtest regressions, which is what I was going to be working on? :)
[22:15] <infinity> There aren't many, thankfully.
[22:15] <jbicha> cough, cough, cough
[22:15] <slangasek> astroscrappy is almost certainly badtest, I just hadn't figured out what that means yet
[22:15] <infinity> Waking up to the sea of green was a pleasant surprise.
[22:16] <infinity> slangasek: That string doesn't appear in astrocrappy's source, so I assume it's a dep that hates life.
[22:16] <infinity> But that's as far as I dug before reminding myself it's a weekend.
[22:18] <jbicha> I thought you guys were making up the name of that package…
[22:18] <slangasek> I remembered the s
[22:18] <slangasek> infinity ... refactored it
[22:18] <slangasek> I assume astroscrappy is an add-on package for astroscooby
[22:19] <jbicha> "Optimized Cosmic Ray Annihilation in Python 3"
[22:20] <jbicha> oh, the github acronym is better "Speedy Cosmic Ray Annihilation Package in Python"
[22:23] <xnox> slangasek, what about nvidia-304? it's blocking my xorg upgrade fix.... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1748000 or should i be working with the kernel team to fix it, because hwe & xenial still probably needs to ship nvidia 304?!
[22:23] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1748000 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu) "Remove from the archive: this legacy driver is unmaintained upstream" [Critical,Triaged]
[22:24] <jbicha> xnox: I'm hoping the mesa/nvidia transition finishes on Monday, not sure how much it's related to your bug
[22:28] <slangasek> xnox: ok, that one I'll trade you for the libunistring-triggered regression in tracker, which looks like it might be a difficult-to-bisect gnulib problem ;)
[22:29] <xnox> slangasek, this is not how the scrub poker is supposed to work!
[22:29] <xnox> *scrum
[22:29]  * jbicha folds
[22:30]  * xnox ponders if we can make an Agile method based on the Risk strategy board game of diplomacy, conflict and conquest
[22:32] <slangasek> xnox: I think you care about tracker, libunistring is tied to libcurl4
[22:32] <xnox> sigh
[22:37] <slangasek> xnox: speaking of which, we've got Debian maintainer ack, I think we should proceed with that upload at least
[22:37] <xnox> slangasek, yes, my plan was to kick it off on Monday.
[22:37] <slangasek> ok
[22:38] <xnox> slangasek, it will need new queue processing, so will not upload no change rebuilds. Unless I do the doko hack of the .dsc
[22:38] <xnox> to include extra build-depends on libcurl-dev (>= bla)
[22:38] <slangasek> ick no :)
[23:11] <acheronuk> slangasek: can the ppc64el and s390x tests on parley be ignored please? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#parley
[23:12] <acheronuk> as it no longer builds on those architectures
[23:15] <acheronuk> ^^^ not urgent :)