| tsimonq2 | (Mesa should not migrate until qtbase is uploaded, and that'll be another couple of days, hopefully not longer.) | 00:14 |
|---|---|---|
| tsimonq2 | ((Core Qt bootstrapping for 5.9.4 is complete, so it just depends on how quickly I can get through the other uploads... #ubuntu-qt has more details.)) | 00:15 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Is that glibc transition something that will collide with the Qt transition? That's close to being ready-to-land and I don't want to break things. :) | 02:07 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output_notest.txt shows the list of packages that need updated for glibc to get in (once tests are resolved); it's a small list and almost certainly not entangled w/ Qt, but if you want to double-check, there it is. Also, is this Qt transition something that will collide with the curl transition? | 03:24 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: I'm not sure what the curl transition involves but https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3113/+packages https://pad.ubuntu.com/BhiLYwz07Y + no-change rebuilds of qtbase and qtdeclarative rdeps + sddm is what it is | 03:25 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: It's a bugfix Qt release. | 03:25 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: anything that depends on libcurl3 will need rebuilt | 03:26 |
| slangasek | I know there are some KDE packages affected | 03:26 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: I'd have to check. | 03:27 |
| * tsimonq2 does so | 03:27 | |
| * slangasek kicks off the rebuilds of the things needing rebuilt for glibc; no reason to wait | 03:29 | |
| tsimonq2 | Cool | 03:29 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: One thing I've always relied on either Ben or Britney to tell me but I can't seem to figure out how to do is find rdeps of e.g. qt{base,declarative}-abi-5-9-3 | 03:30 |
| slangasek | grep-dctrl is your friend | 03:30 |
| tsimonq2 | Ahh, nice. | 03:31 |
| * tsimonq2 RTFMs | 03:31 | |
| slangasek | good news, 'grep-dctrl \( -FDepends qtdeclarative-abi-5-9-3 -o -FDepends qtbase-abi-5-9-3 \) -a -FDepends libcurl3 /chroots/bionic/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_bionic_*amd64_Packages' returns no results | 03:32 |
| * tsimonq2 notes that command for future ref, thanks | 03:33 | |
| tsimonq2 | Once the monster that is qtwebengine (embedded Chromium, it's like a 200 MB source package that takes hours to compile, fun) is done building here, the rest of the Qt transition should take little to no time. | 03:35 |
| tsimonq2 | So my original estimate was two days but it might be ready by tomorrow afternoon(ish) (UTC-6) | 03:35 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Is that OK from a Release Team perspective or do you think glibc needs more time (for some reason)? | 03:36 |
| tsimonq2 | ("the rest of the Qt transition" in Bileto, that is) | 03:38 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: glibc + qt shouldn't get in the way of each other, from what I see, so no reason to delay on account of glibc | 04:20 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: OK, cool. Thanks. | 04:21 |
| tsimonq2 | Tonight I'll start the Britney checks in Bileto so it has time to process while I'm asleep. | 04:22 |
| slangasek | I see someone's been retrying colord/armhf a few times against glibc... that probably needs an updated valgrind | 04:52 |
| * RAOF needs to do the last bits required to release a new colord in Debian and sync. | 06:55 | |
| === sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Xenial 16.04.3, Artful 17.10 | Archive: open | Bionic Release Coordination, 16.04.4 in progress | Please don't upload things during freezes where you shouldn't, or be prepared to apologise to the release team | We accept payment in cash, check or beer | melius malum quod cognoscis | ||
| sil2100 | Note to any SRU members around - for the time of the point release, please don't promote things from xenial-proposed to xenial-updates | 08:01 |
| sil2100 | Not sure if we have any lock for that now as I probably don't have the powers for doing it | 08:01 |
| tsimonq2 | sil2100: generate-freeze-block could be what you're looking for, although that mightt be just for devel... | 08:11 |
| tsimonq2 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 08:11 |
| apw | sil2100, ack | 08:18 |
| apw | tsimonq2, as we don't gate sru's yet via britney it won't help sadly, and in fact everything is blocked | 08:19 |
| tsimonq2 | apw: Ah ok | 08:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Not just seeded stuff? | 08:20 |
| tsimonq2 | What's the reasoning there? | 08:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Also, TIL about not using Britney for that :) | 08:20 |
| sil2100 | Well, not seeded stuff can go in I guess, but since people rarely check that I just mentioned in overall | 08:21 |
| apw | sil2100, keep it at "don't" for now, makes people think before they act | 08:22 |
| apw | tsimonq2, yeah it is in the plan, just never seems to hit the top of the list | 08:22 |
| tsimonq2 | apw: Got something along the lines of a spec somewhere for that? | 08:27 |
| apw | tsimonq2, heh as far as i know it is in infinity's head | 08:28 |
| tsimonq2 | :D | 08:28 |
| mitya57 | slangasek, tsimonq2: “grep-dctrl \( -FDepends qtdeclarative-abi-5-9-3 -o -FDepends qtbase-abi-5-9-3 \) … returns no results” | 08:33 |
| mitya57 | That's because we did not bump the ABI version last time, and it was 5-9-2. | 08:33 |
| tsimonq2 | Ahh | 08:33 |
| tsimonq2 | Right | 08:33 |
| mitya57 | Well, for qtbase only, for qtdeclarative I think it was bumped. | 08:34 |
| jibel | sil2100, on ubuntu desktop 20180223.1 it still says 16.04.3 | 09:04 |
| infinity | jibel: Fixed. | 09:17 |
| infinity | sil2100: ^-- When you updated debian-cd, you missed a 'bzr pull' at nusakan:~cdimage/cdimage/debian-cd | 09:18 |
| infinity | sil2100: So, you get to spin another set with the correct versions. :P | 09:18 |
| infinity | sil2100: I'll leave that to you. | 09:18 |
| jibel | infinity, thanks | 09:24 |
| === freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
| sil2100 | hmmm | 10:48 |
| sil2100 | Ah, crap, I know what happened | 10:49 |
| sil2100 | Since the bzr checkout was actually from nusakan I assumed it's directly to the right branch | 10:49 |
| sil2100 | duh, still needed that bzr pull from the private bzr place to production | 10:50 |
| sil2100 | Stupid me, assuming bzr push pushes to production directly | 10:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-keyring [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.4-2ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-keyring [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.4-2ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-keyring [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.4-2ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-keyring [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.4-2ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-keyring [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.4-2ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-keyring [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.4-2ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted udisks2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted udisks2 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted udisks2 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted udisks2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted udisks2 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted udisks2 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:26 | |
| Laney | can someone promote for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libglvnd/+bug/1749912 please? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.txt | 11:31 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1749912 in libglvnd (Ubuntu) "MIR: libglvnd" [Wishlist,Fix committed] | 11:31 |
| apw | Laney, looking | 11:32 |
| Laney | merci! | 11:32 |
| Laney | should make mutter become a candidate in excuses | 11:32 |
| Laney | and gnome-session..? | 11:33 |
| apw | Laney, done | 11:38 |
| Laney | apw: thanks! | 11:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226) | 12:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226.1) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226.1) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226.1) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226.1) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226.1) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.4] (20180226.1) has been added | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180226.1) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] (core) | 12:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] (core) | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] (core) | 12:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] (core) | 12:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] (core) | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] (core) | 12:45 | |
| coreycb | hello, can an archive admin review percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 in the bionic NEW queue? | 13:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.18-2ubuntu3.5 => 2.4.18-2ubuntu3.6] (ubuntu-server) | 13:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: corosync (artful-proposed/main) [2.4.2-3build1 => 2.4.2-3ubuntu0.17.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.16-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 15:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: corosync (xenial-proposed/main) [2.3.5-3ubuntu2 => 2.3.5-3ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3 => 1.1.14-2ubuntu1.4] (ubuntu-server) | 15:53 | |
| apw | Laney, you have a couple of ADT test failures still holding it back | 16:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ksmtp (bionic-proposed/primary) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 16:24 | |
| * Laney meows at apw | 16:24 | |
| Laney | which it? | 16:24 |
| apw | that lib thing you had me promote | 16:24 |
| Laney | mesa? | 16:24 |
| Laney | oh yeah it's not going in just now anyway due to mesa I don't think | 16:26 |
| Laney | not that I know what the issue is | 16:38 |
| Laney | tseliot: is this fixed by the new nvidia in NEW? | 16:41 |
| tseliot | Laney: what is "this"? I think I got disconnected | 16:42 |
| Laney | oh right, the nvidia / mesa / libglvnd stuff going on in proposed atm | 16:43 |
| tseliot | yes, ideally it would all land at the same time | 16:44 |
| Laney | think the breaks are set up so that it will | 16:45 |
| Laney | but nvidia-340 & 384 seem uninstallable | 16:46 |
| xnox | tseliot, btw. should 304 be fixed up? there is a patch, that somebody on the forums wrote to make it compile with v4.15. | 16:46 |
| xnox | tseliot, it does change the module license.... | 16:46 |
| tseliot | Laney: I have changes for 340, but I was waiting for the new xserver to land first. Also, 390 will replace 384 | 16:47 |
| Laney | okey | 16:47 |
| tseliot | xnox: 304 should be dropped. tjaalton filed a bug report about it | 16:47 |
| Laney | well mesa isn't actually trying to go in yet | 16:47 |
| tseliot | good thing I need to fix some stuff in nvidia first | 16:47 |
| tseliot | 390 | 16:48 |
| seb128 | it's annoying that this stack is not ready, it's blocking other transitions and features in proposed now :/ | 16:48 |
| tseliot | my drivers are ready to go. I don't know what's blocking mesa, to be honest | 16:50 |
| apw | mesa seems to be being held because of a fair number of adt regressions | 17:02 |
| nacc | apw: i believe tjaalton is working on a transition, but i'm not 100% | 17:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (xenial-proposed/main) [2:9.1.2-0ubuntu4 => 2:9.1.2-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 17:15 | |
| slangasek | tjaalton: fwiw processing Debian removals, s2tc is dropped because Debian bug #888430 says it's obsolete as of mesa 17.3, which we have in bionic. I'm assuming that makes it ok to drop, but shout if I'm wrong | 17:17 |
| ubot5` | Debian bug 888430 in ftp.debian.org "RM: s2tc -- ROM; superseded by native s3tc support in mesa" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/888430 | 17:17 |
| jbicha | yay, removals | 17:18 |
| slangasek | infinity: was that you retrying awesome/armhf in a loop to try to get it to pass? looks flaky/racy here, maybe time for a badtest? | 17:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync [source] (artful-proposed) [2.4.2-3ubuntu0.17.10.1] | 17:28 | |
| infinity | slangasek: Dunno about "in a loop", I may have tried it a couple of times. | 17:30 |
| slangasek | k :) | 17:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pacemaker [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.16-1ubuntu2] | 17:35 | |
| ddstreet | sil2100 re: 16.04.4, is everything currently in the xenial upload queue waiting until march 2 before it's accepted/rejected? | 17:36 |
| infinity | ddstreet: No. | 17:38 |
| ddstreet | infinity ok so it'll proceed into -proposed as usual? just wait there until after point release? | 17:38 |
| infinity | ddstreet: Things can be reviewed and accepted into -proposed, there's just a lock on releasing from -proposed to -updates. | 17:38 |
| ddstreet | awesome thnx! | 17:39 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: ^^ speaking of which, what conclusions did you reach wrt the Lubuntu-specific SRUs for 16.04.4? | 17:39 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: They can land after the point release . | 17:41 |
| sil2100 | ddstreet: as infinity said | 17:41 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: ok cool | 17:42 |
| flocculant | sil2100: thanks - I noticed the 16.04.3 on Saturday - but you were off doing life, so couldn't ping you :p | 17:42 |
| tsimonq2 | Out of curiosity, what's the reasoning behind blocking even non-seeded packages froo migrating to xenial-updaytes? | 17:42 |
| tsimonq2 | (grr @ mobile keyboard) | 17:43 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: There's no reason they can't, except that migrations are a manual process, and "don't do it" is easier than "do it, but double-check all these lists and don't screw up". | 17:43 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Ah, makes sense. | 17:44 |
| tsimonq2 | Thanks. | 17:44 |
| sil2100 | flocculant: yeah, sorry about that! | 17:47 |
| flocculant | sil2100: not too worried - expected at least 1 respin before Thursday - and after installing it was calling itself 16.04.4 :p | 17:48 |
| slangasek | fpc autopkgtest fails because it succeeds. Well job | 17:50 |
| flocculant | sil2100: shame the ubiquity change re keyboard layout choice wasn't in - I'm failing the lvm test for us - not that it stops me marking it ready | 17:50 |
| infinity | slangasek: Having a working Pascal compiler does seem like it could be qualified as a failure. | 17:51 |
| sil2100 | flocculant: yeah, it's fixed for bionic but we didn't backport it yet indeed | 17:52 |
| sil2100 | Maybe next point-release then | 17:52 |
| nacc | slangasek: could you review the updated removals in LP: #1749745? today? i'm uploading the reverse-recommends drops now, and after the bug is processed, we should be able to remove php7.1 | 17:52 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1749745 in zoneminder (Ubuntu) "php7.2 has removed the mcrypt module" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1749745 | 17:52 |
| flocculant | ack | 17:52 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: I'm triggering autopkgtests of the snapcraft in release against the maven in release, to hopefully confirm whether this failure is already present in that version; if so we should badtest it and let snapcraft migrate | 17:54 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: (unless this is a new test which doesn't exist at all in the release version?) | 17:54 |
| sergiusens | slangasek: the snapcraft that is released might not work in 18.04 as this is the release that has all the bits; I can manually check with an older version of maven on my side | 17:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.17+really1.1.16-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 17:56 | |
| slashd | sil2100, ^ | 17:56 |
| sil2100 | slashd: thanks! | 17:57 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: well, the point of my test is to establish whether this is already broken in the release pocket, and if so allow the snapcraft to migrate because it's not a regression; your bit sounds more useful for fixing the broken autopkgtest, which is something I would leave to you | 17:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okular [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:00 | |
| sergiusens | slangasek: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/bionic/amd64 ... "snapcraft/2.39.2+18.04" was green and "snapcraft/2.39.2+18.04.2" failed and my local debdiff between those two show no relevant affecting changes http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/CM7DfghzK4/ | 18:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.17+really1.1.16-1ubuntu2] | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.3.5-3ubuntu2.1] | 18:09 | |
| tjaalton | slangasek: they're right, s2tc can be dropped. the recommends on libtxc-* were left over after a merge, and I have dropped them from git | 18:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.4] | 18:11 | |
| tjaalton | hrm, the kde autopkgtests tend to be less useful, they just say "fail" and nothing to debug other than blindly retry until they pass | 18:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [390.25-0ubuntu1] | 18:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [390.25-0ubuntu1] | 18:55 | |
| slashd | davecore, ^^ | 19:10 |
| davecore | slashd: ack | 19:10 |
| slangasek | nacc: huh, cakephp-scripts shows up as a revdep of cakephp now, but didn't get flagged previously on LP: #1749745. Remove also? | 19:48 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1749745 in gosa (Ubuntu) "php7.2 has removed the mcrypt module" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1749745 | 19:48 |
| nacc | slangasek: oh sorry, i meant to add it, yes, i'll add a task | 19:48 |
| nacc | slangasek: oh wait, yes, but it's from src:cakephp | 19:49 |
| slangasek | nacc: oh oops I typed the wrong command - ack | 19:50 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Since Bileto seems to bypass the usual queue checks, I think it's a good idea to ask for a review; could you please do a prelim review of https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3113 to make sure it looks good? | 20:02 |
| tsimonq2 | (with your AA hat on) | 20:03 |
| nacc | slangasek: thanks for the removals, i believe c-m also has a list of binaries that can move to universe now (it should be everything in php7.1, but i think it won't until the NBS php-mcrypt is removed. Do you want me to add tasks for that in that bug? | 20:16 |
| slangasek | nacc: absolutely not, c-m is its own todo list :) | 20:23 |
| nacc | slangasek: ok :) | 20:24 |
| slangasek | nacc: and fwiw I haven't removed gosa yet, I need to still decide what makes sense with its revdeps... zoneminder had a sourceful RC bug in its own right, but the gosa plugins might be releasable again if someone fixes gosa - so those might be demote-to-proposed in the near term | 20:24 |
| nacc | slangasek: ack, that's fine with me | 20:24 |
| nacc | slangasek: keeping in mind gosa-plugins-* is from src:gosa | 20:25 |
| nacc | slangasek: so i guess you mean just demote the whole source package? | 20:25 |
| slangasek | nacc: gosa-plugin-mailaddress is its own src package; etc | 20:26 |
| slangasek | nacc: these'ns: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gosa/+bug/1749745/comments/9 | 20:26 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1749745 in gosa (Ubuntu) "php7.2 has removed the mcrypt module" [Undecided,New] | 20:26 |
| nacc | slangasek: ah ok, sorry, i had checked several of that list and they wer in src:gosa, so i must have missed some | 20:27 |
| nacc | (e.g., gosa-plugin-webdav is from src:gosa) | 20:27 |
| slangasek | oh | 20:27 |
| slangasek | well hang on then, do we have some source packages that need nuked? | 20:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nplan (artful-proposed/main) [0.32~17.10.1 => 0.32~17.10.2] (core) | 20:28 | |
| slangasek | nacc: yeah, definitely some weirdness in the reverse-depends output here, some of these binaries are definitely from src:gosa and always have been so shouldn't show up in the output against src:gosa | 20:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [9.1.85-1] (no packageset) | 20:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [9.1.85-1] (no packageset) | 20:48 | |
| slangasek | sergiusens: the snapcraft autopkgtest failed in the release pocket of course, but the maven test case that failed in the -proposed version *passed* in the release version | 20:50 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: how do you want to play this? I can justify letting this package into the release pocket with a skiptest hint on the grounds that so much else has changed around it that the version currently in release pocket is unreleasable anyway - but I'll only do that if you agree that regressing the maven plugin (as the test regression implies) is ok | 20:52 |
| sergiusens | slangasek: I played with the test locally and it all works, the only environmental differences we have are that autopkgtests use a proxy. I'll keep looking into it. | 20:59 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: I'm glad you'll keep looking into it - in the meantime, do you think this package should be allowed through the gauntlet? | 21:00 |
| sergiusens | slangasek: personally, yes; this is the one where we add all that elf work to make things actually do things after built | 21:00 |
| slangasek | e.g. if the test passes locally, do you think it's a bad test, and maybe it's not a regression for users? | 21:00 |
| sergiusens | slangasek: whatever is in bionic now produces things that do not work | 21:01 |
| slangasek | heh | 21:01 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: fyi that's a trump card you can always play to get me to skip autopkgtests | 21:01 |
| sergiusens | I am not faking anthing here fwiw ;-) | 21:02 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: when you test it locally, are you using bionic-proposed as a source? Do the snapcraft tests inherit the apt pinning autopkgtest does for -proposed, or does it try to pull all packages from -proposed? | 21:09 |
| sergiusens | slangasek: I do not have -proposed enabled at all; so no to everything; it was a light test in between the things I was doing. I don't mind waiting a week for this to get in (it has already been 3 months ;-) ) | 21:13 |
| nacc | slangasek: yeah, it feels like something chnaged, but i don't know what | 21:19 |
| slangasek | sergiusens: I do mind it waiting another week if that results in further decay (especially as e.g. we're waiting on a working snapcraft for subiquity). But if you're testing without -proposed, and the autopkgtest is testing with full -proposed, and it fails in -proposed, there's a chance something is about to regress in release that impacts snapcraft | 21:19 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: sorry, effectively the answer is no, I can't do a prelim review | 21:26 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: No problem | 21:27 |
| tsimonq2 | Thanks | 21:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [i386] (bionic-proposed) [7.58.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:30 | |
| tgm4883 | Could someone take a look as to why mythtv isn't being promoted out of bionic-proposed? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#mythtv | 21:43 |
| infinity | tgm4883: Because upgrading libvpx causes a bazillion things to become uninstallable. | 21:57 |
| infinity | (ie: you're in the middle of a transition) | 21:57 |
| tgm4883 | ah, so it should clear itself up then eventually? | 21:57 |
| infinity | Seems plausible. Not sure who, if anyone, is actively working on that particular transition right now. | 21:58 |
| tgm4883 | ok | 21:58 |
| tgm4883 | I just got the email that it's been in proposed for 5+ days so was worried | 21:59 |
| acheronuk | tjaalton: kde tests on mesa should be passed now, or about to | 22:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nplan (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.32~16.04.3 => 0.32~16.04.4] (no packageset) | 22:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected latte-dock [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] | 23:26 | |
| slangasek | xnox: I am confused by your followups on LP: #1748000, Timo filed a bug requesting the package's removal and you assigned it to the kernel team | 23:32 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1748000 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu) "Remove from the archive: this legacy driver is unmaintained upstream" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1748000 | 23:32 |
| xnox | slangasek, there is a ftbfs in the wild, but it's best to remove the package. | 23:33 |
| xnox | slangasek, i was not sure what was going to happe quicker | 23:33 |
| xnox | slangasek, please remove it. | 23:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!