[01:50] Yeah no, I'm ditching the plan of doing the gammaray update just for the Qt transition... [01:50] I'll do it in Debian then sync later [01:50] But it doesn't need to be done for this transition [04:12] qtwebengine built fine on amd64 so I'm retrying depwait rdeps [04:12] The others, well, we're talking arm* and i386 here, so it might be a bit :) [04:13] But gammaray is fixed, so once qtwebengine builds on those arches and the depwait rdeps have successful builds, it should be good to publish [04:15] I'm pondering leaving Britney overnight and publishing after no-change rebuilds tomorrow morning, but it might just be publishable, then we can have Ben tell us what the missing rdeps are [04:15] It all depends on how quickly qtwebengine will build I think [04:15] Dunno :) [04:19] In fact, nah, it should be good to publish [04:19] It's just a bugfix Qt, so the transition shouldn't take a large amount of time [04:19] Plus, I've gotten release team clearance so we're good [04:21] LocutusOfBorg, mitya57: Could one of you please rebuild the remaining depwait packages (if there is any) when you wake up and then publish? [04:21] I can then handle the no-change rebuilds; I'll be around from 13 or 14 UTC and on [04:23] (I have off of school tomorrow \o/) [04:26] Oh, right, before I forget, the block-proposed tag can be removed from bug 1749472 once the packages are published. [04:26] bug 1749472 in mesa (Ubuntu Bionic) "mesa 18.0.0 will cause rendering errors in Qt applications" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1749472 [04:27] And whoever does publish, *don't mark Finalize on the ticket until it's migrated*, Bileto has nice proposed migration tracking that can tell us which packages have to migrate still ;) [05:52] So I'm going to bed; the only two rdeps that need rebuilding then are qtwebview and pyqt5 [05:52] The rest should be good [06:01] @tsimonq2, I woke up. Qt WebEngine is still building, so cannot retry anything yet. [06:01] Sure, no problem [06:01] Will look again in ~3 hours :) [06:01] OK :) [06:02] I'll be sleeping for sure then :) [12:25] NICE, so all of the packages are built [12:26] Checked the lander signoff but meh, it can be published [12:28] Publishing [12:28] \o/ [12:28] **gulp** [12:32] I'll look at what Ben has to say when I get home in like 30 mins [13:10] Er... Did it publish? [13:10] Two minutes ago [13:10] Because I got it right only from the third try. [13:10] Ah OK [13:11] What did you have to do in between? [13:11] First regenerate the diffs, second check the ACK packaging button. [13:20] OK [16:46] nggraham was added by: nggraham [16:46] Welcome! [16:46] thanks! [17:02] https://twitter.com/tsimonq2/status/968531448704720897 [17:07] are we targeting 5.9.4 for Bionic? Or starting with that moving onto 5.9.5 in a bit? [17:07] I'll talk with the Release Team, but 5.9.5 if we can make it happen [17:07] cool [17:09] According to today's meeting http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2018-February/004615.html, target is to get 5.9.5 out during March [17:09] Right [17:09] But it's bugfix, so it should be fine, right? [17:09] Yes, I think we should aim for having it in Bionic [17:09] I do too [17:10] Maybe even later 5.9.x releases as SRUs, but we need to relax the version check. [17:10] Right === tsimonq2 changed the topic of #ubuntu-qt to: Ubuntu Qt Discussion Channel | https://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-qt-transitions | Currently: 5.9.4 in Bionic, 5.9.1 in Artful, 5.5.1 in Xenial, 5.2.1 in Trusty | This channel is bridged to Telegram at https://t.me/ubuntuqt | This channel is LOGGED at irclogs.ubuntu.com. Use of this channel implies acceptance of terms at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/TermsOfService